Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Segmentation-Based Determination of Factors Influencing Women’s Labor Force Participation


Affiliations
1 Economics & Business Environment area at Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Most of the studies in India on labor force participation of women considered the country as a whole ignoring the vast diversity within India.This study narrows its scopeon one state,viz. Maharashtra. Within Maharashtra, there are disparities among different regions.The study uses data from the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) 68th Round for analysis.The paper offers two competing Probit models; first takes into account the impact of 7 variables – sub round, sector, gender, region, relation to the household head, religion and education.The second model includes marital status and the social group consisting of 54 micro segments, based on all possible combinations using the values of four variables – sector, marital status, social group and education.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Beneria, Lourdes (1979), “Reproduction, Production and the Sexual Division of Labor”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(3): 203 –25.

  • Besamusca, Janna, Tijdens, Kea, Keune, Maarten& Steinmetz, Stephanie (2015), “Working Women Worldwide, Age Effects in Female Labor Force Participation in 117 Countries”, World Development, 74(C): 123 –41.

  • Bhalla, Surjit & Kaur, Ravinder (2011), Labor Force Participation of Women in India: Some Facts, Some Queries, London School of Economics.

  • Chakrabarti, Asok (1977), “The Causes of Women’s Unemployment in India’, Economic Affairs, 22(5): 177 –83.

  • Chevalier, Arnaud & Viitanen, Tarja (2002), “The Causality between Female LFP and the Availability of Childcare”, Applied Economics Letters, 9(14): 915 –18.

  • Cooke, Fang (2010), “Women’s Participation in Employment in Asia: a Comparative Analysisof China, India, Japan and South Korea”, The International Journal of HRM, 21(12): 2249 – 70.

  • Cox, Sir David& Snell, Joyce (1989), The Analysis of Binary Data, 2nd ed, London, Chapman and Hall.

  • Dunlop, John & Velkoff, Victoria (1999), Women in the Economy of India, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, International Programs Center

  • Dutta, Puja;Murgai, Rinku; Ravallion, Martin & van de Walle, Dominique (2012), Does India’s Employment Guarantee Scheme Guarantee Employment?’,World Bank Policy Research.

  • Gandhi Kingdon, Geeta&Unni, Jeemol (2001), “Education and Women’s Labor Market Outcomes in India”, Education Economics, 9(2): 173 –95.

  • Ghosh, Robin& Roy, Kartik (1997), “The Changing Status of Women in India: Impact of Urbanization and Development”, International Journal of Social Economics, 24(7/ 8/9): 902 –17.

  • Hirway, Indira (2002), “Employment and Unemployment Situation in 1990s: How Good Are NSS Data?” Economic and Political Weekly, 37(21): 2027 –36.

  • Killingsworth, Mark& Heckman, James (1986), “Female Labor Supply: A Survey”, in Handbook of Labor Economics, Elsevier SciencePublishers, Vol. 1: 103 – 197

  • Lim, Lin Leam (2004), “Female Labor-force Participation”, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Gender Promotion Program (GENPROM), International Labor Office

  • Mehrotra, Santosh & Parida, Jajati (2017), ‘Why is the Labor Force Participation of Women Declining in India?’, World Development,98 (10): 360 –80.

  • Moghadam, Valentine (1999), “Gender and globalization: Female Labor and Women’s Mobilization”, Journal of World-Systems Research, 5(2): 367 –88.

  • Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991), “A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination”, Biometrika, 78(3): 691 – 92.

  • Neff, Daniel;Sen, Kunal& Kling, Veronika (2012), The Puzzling Decline in Rural Women’s Labor Force Participation in India: A Reexamination, German Institute of Global and Area Studies,Institute of Asian Studies, Hamburg,No. 196.

  • Panda, Pradeep (1999), Poverty and Young Women’s Employment: Linkages in Kerala,Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram.

  • Schultz, Paul (1990), “Women’s Changing Participation in the Labor Force: A World Perspective”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 38(3): 457 –88.

  • Sebastian, Alice& Navaneetham, K. (2008), Gender, Education and Work: Determinants of Women’s Employment in Kerala, Indian Statistical Institute,Calcutta.

  • Singh, Awadhesh (2016), “Do Technology Spillovers Accelerate Performance? Unraveling a Puzzle”, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 22(3): 108 – 120

  • Singh, Awadhesh (2016), “R&D Spillovers& Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(4): 563 –79.

  • Singh, Awadhesh (2017), ‘Keeping It Simple: Comparative Analysis of TFP across Manufacturing Industries and Major States of India”, Theoretical Economics Letters, 7(6): 1821.

  • Singh, Awadhesh (2017),”Merge or Acquire-A Strategic Framework”, Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle: XVII, Medicine, 3: 125 – 139

  • Singh, Awadhesh(2018), “Does Size Matter? – The Effect of Size of Production Workers, Management Staff and Proprietors on Productivity”, Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(11): 2290

  • Srivastava, Nisha & Srivastava, Ravi (2010), “Women, Work and Employment Outcomes in Rural India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 45(28): 49 – 63.

  • Verick, Sher (2016), Women’s Labor Force Participation in India: Why Is It So Low?, International Labor Organization.

  • Yadav, Sarita (2014), “The Status of Women’s Employment and Empowerment”, The Indian Journal of Research, 8(6): 6 – 9.


Abstract Views: 301

PDF Views: 0




  • A Segmentation-Based Determination of Factors Influencing Women’s Labor Force Participation

Abstract Views: 301  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nirad Inamdar
Economics & Business Environment area at Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, India

Abstract


Most of the studies in India on labor force participation of women considered the country as a whole ignoring the vast diversity within India.This study narrows its scopeon one state,viz. Maharashtra. Within Maharashtra, there are disparities among different regions.The study uses data from the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) 68th Round for analysis.The paper offers two competing Probit models; first takes into account the impact of 7 variables – sub round, sector, gender, region, relation to the household head, religion and education.The second model includes marital status and the social group consisting of 54 micro segments, based on all possible combinations using the values of four variables – sector, marital status, social group and education.

References