Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Branding Practices & Market Analysis of Knitwear Industry- An Empirical Study of Ludhiana Cluster


Affiliations
1 PG Dept. of Commerce, DAV College, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The Knitwear industry all over the world is at the threshold of far-reaching institutional changes. The removal of quantitative restrictions has brought about important implications. It has thrown open both the opportunities and threats, especially for the low-income economies seeking to industrialise through promotion of the garment sector. This sector contributes about 14 percent to industrial production, 4 percent to the gross domestic product (GDP), and 11 percent to the country's total export earnings of which 45% comes through the share of knitted garments. Over 95% of the nation’s output of Woolen/Acrylic hosiery comes from Ludhiana. The textiles sector is the second largest provider of employment after agriculture. Ludhiana Knitwear Industry, though it is one of the biggest clusters of the knitwear units in Asia, lacks in its image building, image that promises consistent hi-quality and conveys the personality it deserves, both for the domestic as well as international market. In the absence of any recognizable brand, consumers mostly make their selection entirely based on the liking of the styles, fits and range of prices vis-a-vis their choice. There is absolutely no assurance for product quality for such choices. With a daily factory employment of 55 workers per 1,000 population, compared to 11 for India as a whole, and 19 for Punjab, Ludhiana district is clearly Punjab's Knitwear hub which is also known as Manchester of India.

Keywords

Brand Orientation, Branding Strategies, Cluster.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adamson, A. (2003). What is branding? Future of branding based on current trends. Marketing Mastermind, 3(2), 46-50
  • Apex Cluster Development service report, 2011 pp 3-4 Ballester, E. D., & Aleman, J. S. (2005). Does brand trust matter to brand equity?. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(3), 187-196.
  • Dharamraj, C. (2010). Impact of brand preference dimension on consumer satisfaction-A meta analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 40, 10-13.
  • Jebanesan, M. J., & Bhavani, S. (2007). Brand awareness analysis of an extensive rural reaching capital items:A case study in Kanya kumari district. Indian Journal of Marketing, 37(6), 32-38.
  • Maruthanmuthu, K., Kumar, K. K., & Vasan, M. (2006). Consumer behaviour and brand preference of Britannia biscuits an empirical study with reference to Salem, Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Marketing, 36(8), 17-22.
  • Merabet. A., & Benhabib, A(2012). Brand personality: Antecedents and Consequences. Indian Journal of Marketing, 42(10), 11-12.
  • Mishra, A. K., & Pallavi (2008). Brand marketing through customer relationship management. Indian Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 15-22.
  • Mohan B .C., & Sequeira, A. H. (2013). Brand equity and business performance : Towards conceptual framework. Indian Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 5-10.
  • Pate, M. (1995). Lesson from the progressive implementation of just-in-time in small knitwear manufacturer. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(9), 271-288.
  • Ramesh , H. N. (2011). Customer Loyalty programs and Marketing Strategies. Indian Journal of Marketing, 41(7), 14-16.
  • Roll, M. (2004). Corporate branding strategy-A guide line. Venture Republic, 60-64.
  • Simoes, C., & Dibb, S. (2001). Rethinking the brand concept:New brand orientation" International Journal of Corporate Communications, 6(4), 217-224
  • Sutherland, M. (2002). Ad Strategies for Brand Warfare. Advertising Express, 29-32.
  • The Financial Express. (2011). pp 5.
  • Vernakar, S. S., & Wadhwa, P. (2009). Marketing India as brand (Brand India, An Idea Whose Time has Come). Indian Journal of Marketing, 39(6), 30-39.
  • Wikipedia-Ludhiana
  • www.pbindustries.gov.in/industry/wisestatus.htm
  • www.knitwearclub.com/aboutus.php
  • http://www.pbindustries.gov.in/SectorWise.htm
  • http://www.indiantextilejournal.com/articles/FAdetails.asp292

Abstract Views: 414

PDF Views: 2




  • Branding Practices & Market Analysis of Knitwear Industry- An Empirical Study of Ludhiana Cluster

Abstract Views: 414  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Sanjeev Sharma
PG Dept. of Commerce, DAV College, Jalandhar, Punjab, India

Abstract


The Knitwear industry all over the world is at the threshold of far-reaching institutional changes. The removal of quantitative restrictions has brought about important implications. It has thrown open both the opportunities and threats, especially for the low-income economies seeking to industrialise through promotion of the garment sector. This sector contributes about 14 percent to industrial production, 4 percent to the gross domestic product (GDP), and 11 percent to the country's total export earnings of which 45% comes through the share of knitted garments. Over 95% of the nation’s output of Woolen/Acrylic hosiery comes from Ludhiana. The textiles sector is the second largest provider of employment after agriculture. Ludhiana Knitwear Industry, though it is one of the biggest clusters of the knitwear units in Asia, lacks in its image building, image that promises consistent hi-quality and conveys the personality it deserves, both for the domestic as well as international market. In the absence of any recognizable brand, consumers mostly make their selection entirely based on the liking of the styles, fits and range of prices vis-a-vis their choice. There is absolutely no assurance for product quality for such choices. With a daily factory employment of 55 workers per 1,000 population, compared to 11 for India as a whole, and 19 for Punjab, Ludhiana district is clearly Punjab's Knitwear hub which is also known as Manchester of India.

Keywords


Brand Orientation, Branding Strategies, Cluster.

References