Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Corporate Social Responsibility & Shareholder Returns – Evidence from the Indian Capital Market


Affiliations
1 Department of Financial Studies & Director, Centre for Canadian Studies, University of Delhi – South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The primary aim of this paper is to empirically examine the relative performance of the portfolio of sociallyscreened stocks in the Indian capital market. Using data on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) index (‘S&P ESG India Index’) and market index (‘S&P CNX 500 Index’) for the sample period January 2005-September 2008, this empirical study has inferred that the portfolio of stocks of socially responsible companies has not underperformed the market. Rather, as against the market, there are signals of positive excess return, though statistically not significant, for the shareholders of the socially responsible companies. Also, results of shareholder returns for the socially responsible companies are comparable with those observed for the ‘Nifty’ Portfolio (‘S&P CNX Nifty Index’). These research findings have implications for sociallyresponsible investment decisions made by both the (activist) investors and corporate management.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anginer, D., Fisher, K. & Statman, M. (2007), Stocks of Admired Companies and Despised Ones, Working Paper, University of Michigan.

  • Bauer, R., Koedijik, K. & Otteu, R. (2005), “International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 29: 1751- 67.

  • Bowen, H.R. (1953), Social Responsibility of Business, Harper, New York. Brammer, S., Brooks, C. & Pavelin, S. (2006), “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregated Measures”, Financial Management, 35: 97-116.

  • Demosthenous, M. (2000) , The Social Responsibility of Business: A Review, Research Paper, The Flinders University of South Australia, Australia.

  • Edams, A. (2008), “Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices”, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston.

  • Friedman, M. (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase it Profits”, New York Times Magazine, 13 September.

  • Geczy, C., Stambaugh, R. & Levin, D. (2005), “Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania, USA.

  • Goodpaster, K.E. (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 53-73.

  • Gray, R.H. (1992), “Accounting and Environmentalism: An Exploration of the Chal lenge of Gent ly Accounting for Accountabil i ty, Transparency and Sustainability”. Accounting,

  • Organizations and Society, 17: 399-425. Hamilton, S., Jo, H. & Statman, M. (1993), “Doing Well While Doing Good: The Investment Per formance of Social ly Responsible Mutual Funds”, Financial Analysts Journal, November / December: 62-72.

  • Hong, H. & Kacperczyk M. (2008), “The Price of Sin: The Effect of Social Norms on Markets”, Working Paper, University of British Columbia.

  • Jensen, M.C. (1968), “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964”, Journal of Finance, 23 (2) May: 389-416.

  • Johnson & Johnson (2008a),”Our History” http:/ /www.jnj.com/connect/about-jnj/companyhistory/( accessed on Oct.22, 2008)

  • Johnson & Johnson (2008b), “Our Credo Values”, http://www.jnj.com/connect/ about-jnj/jnj-credo/?flash=true (accessed on Oct.22, 2008).

  • Kropp, Robert (2008), “Investor Initiatives Join Forces to Call for ESG Considerations in Investment Research”, Sustainability Investment News, October 10, http:// www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/ 2564.html (accessed on Oct.22, 2008).

  • Lau, R.S.M. & May, B.E. (1998) “A Win-Win Paradigm for Quality of Work Life and Business Performance”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Fall: 211-26.

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972) “Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks”, Business and Society, 1: 71-75.

  • National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) (2008), S&P ESG India index, www.nseindia.com

  • Renneboog, L., Horst, J.T. & Zhang, C. (2008), “The Price of Ethics and Stakeholder Governance: The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 14: 302-22.

  • Reserve Bank of India (RBI) (2008), RBI Bullet in, various issues, http://www. rbi.org.in (last accessed on Nov.28, 2008)

  • Schroder, M. (2007), “Is There a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 34: 331-48.

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1966), “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business, January, 119-58.

  • Sharpe, W.F., Alexander, G.J. & Bailey, J.V. (1995), Investments, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

  • Standard & Poor’s (S&P) (2008), “S&P ESG India Index: Index Methodology”, January, New York,

  • Teoh, S.H., Welch, I. & Wazzan (1999), “The Effect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott”, Journal of Business, 72: 35-89.

  • Treynor, J.L. (1965), “How to Rate Management of Investment Funds”, Harvard Business Review, January/February: 63-75.

  • Yermack, D. (2006), “Flights of Fancy: Corporate Jets, CEO Perquisi tes, and Infer ior Shareholder Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 211-42.

  • Uni ted Nat ions (UN) (2000) , Mi l lennium Development Goals, http://www.undp.org/ mdg/basics (accessed on Nov.15, 2008)

  • United Nations (UN) (2005), Developing the Principles for Responsible Investment, http://www.unpri.org/

  • Vasal, V.K. (2006), Corporate Reporting in India: Financial and Social Performance Disclosures, New Century, New Delhi.


Abstract Views: 285

PDF Views: 0




  • Corporate Social Responsibility & Shareholder Returns – Evidence from the Indian Capital Market

Abstract Views: 285  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

V. K. Vasal
Department of Financial Studies & Director, Centre for Canadian Studies, University of Delhi – South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India

Abstract


The primary aim of this paper is to empirically examine the relative performance of the portfolio of sociallyscreened stocks in the Indian capital market. Using data on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) index (‘S&P ESG India Index’) and market index (‘S&P CNX 500 Index’) for the sample period January 2005-September 2008, this empirical study has inferred that the portfolio of stocks of socially responsible companies has not underperformed the market. Rather, as against the market, there are signals of positive excess return, though statistically not significant, for the shareholders of the socially responsible companies. Also, results of shareholder returns for the socially responsible companies are comparable with those observed for the ‘Nifty’ Portfolio (‘S&P CNX Nifty Index’). These research findings have implications for sociallyresponsible investment decisions made by both the (activist) investors and corporate management.

References