Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Socio-technical Analysis of Firm Level Executive Jobs: A Comparative Study in Indian Organizations


Affiliations
1 Heritage Institute of Technology Calcutta, India
2 Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The theory of socio-technical system has been considered as an effective tool for designing and redesigning jobs in organizations since long. Striking a balance between the technical and social subsystems of a job remains the major challenge till today. The design of jobs at executive level through socio-technical system requires the appropriate analysis of relevant technical and social subsystem constructs/factors in the organization. The present study was conducted in various types of Indian industrial organizations (public and private sectors, manufacturing and service sectors) to make a comparative analysis among them. The paper helps to extract the extent to which the technical and social subsystem factors do exist in the executive level jobs in line with the framework of socio-technical design of jobs.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Cherns, A.B. (1978), “The Principles of Sociotechnical Design”, in W. Pasmore & J. Sherwood (Eds), Socio-technical Systems: a Source book, La Jolla, CA: University Associates: 61-71.
  • Cherns, A.B. (1987),“Principles of Sociotechnical Design Revisited”, Human Relations, 40: 153-62.
  • Davis, L.E., Cherns, A.B. & Associates (1975), Quality of Working Life: Problems, Prospects, and State of the Art, Vol.1, New York: Free Press.
  • Davis, L., & Taylor, T. (1979), Technology and Job Design, in L. Davis & J. Taylor (Eds.), Design of Jobs, Santa Monica, California: Goodyear.
  • Davis, L. (1979), Optimizing Organization-Plant Design: a Complementary Structure for Technical and Social Systems, Organizational Dynamics, 8: 2-15.
  • de Sitter, L.U., den Hertog, J.F., Dankbaar, B. (1997), “From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs”, Human Relations, 50 (5):497-534.
  • Eijnatten, F.M. (1998), “Developments in Sociotechnical Systems Design”, in Drenth, P.J. and Thierry, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol.4, 2nd ed., Psychology Press, Hove.
  • Emery, F. (1959), Characteristics of Sociotechnical Systems, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc.527.
  • Emery, F. (1962), Technology and Social Organization, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Doc. T-42.
  • Emery, F. & Trist, E. (1965), “The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments”, Human Relations, 18: 21-31.
  • Fox, W.M. (1995), “Socio-technical System Principles and Guidelines: Past and Present”, Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 31(1): 95-105.
  • Fullen, M. (1970), “Industrial Technology and Worker Integration in the Organization”, American Sociological Review, 35: 1028- 39.
  • Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1976), “Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159-70.
  • Hendrick, H. W. (1991). “Ergonomics in Organizational Design”, Management. Ergonomics, 34 (6): 743-56.
  • Klein, L. (1994), “Socio-technical/Organizational Design”, in Karwowski, W.& Salvendy, G. (Eds.), Organization and Management of Advanced Manufacturing, Wiley, New York,:197-222.
  • Lawler, E.E. (1986), High-involvement Management: Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Lawler, E. E. (1996). From the Ground Up, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Macy, B. A., Thompson, R. & Farias, G. F. (1995). “Describing and Assessing High Performance Work Practices in Innovative Organizations: A Benchmarking Study of 82 North American Organizations”, Paper presented at National Academy of Management Meetings, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Medsker, G.J. & Campion, M.A. (1997), “Job and Team Design”, in Salvendy, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Wiley, New York.
  • Older, M.T., Waterson, P.E. & Clegg, C.W. (1999), A New Method for Allocating Tasks amongst Humans and Machines, Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield.
  • Pasmore, W. & Sherwood, J. (Eds.) (1988), Socio_technical Systems: A Sourcebook, San Diego: University Associates.
  • Taylor, J.C., & Felten, D.F. (1993), Performance by Design: Socio-technical Systems in North America, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Thompson, J. & Bates, F. (1957), “Technology, Organization and Administration”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 325- 43.
  • Trist, E. & Bamforth, K. (1951), “Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Long Wall Method of Coal-getting”, Human Relations, 1, 3-38.
  • Trist, E., Higgin, C., Murray, H. & Pollock, A. (1963), Organizational Choice, London: Tavistock Publications.
  • Warr, P.B. (1987), Work, Unemployment and Mental Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Woodward, J. (1958), Management and Technology, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

Abstract Views: 208

PDF Views: 0




  • Socio-technical Analysis of Firm Level Executive Jobs: A Comparative Study in Indian Organizations

Abstract Views: 208  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

K. Ghosh
Heritage Institute of Technology Calcutta, India
S. Sahney
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India

Abstract


The theory of socio-technical system has been considered as an effective tool for designing and redesigning jobs in organizations since long. Striking a balance between the technical and social subsystems of a job remains the major challenge till today. The design of jobs at executive level through socio-technical system requires the appropriate analysis of relevant technical and social subsystem constructs/factors in the organization. The present study was conducted in various types of Indian industrial organizations (public and private sectors, manufacturing and service sectors) to make a comparative analysis among them. The paper helps to extract the extent to which the technical and social subsystem factors do exist in the executive level jobs in line with the framework of socio-technical design of jobs.

References