Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Questionnaire-Experimental Study of Equity Evaluations Over Time


Affiliations
1 University of Osnabrueck, Germany
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Most of the studies in empirical social choice are snapshot-like. These studies do not allow to check whether the results found are intertemporally stable or not. The author presents here his findings which stretch over a period of roughly 15 years regarding the two situations that were given to (mostly) undergraduate students in economics and business administration at the University of Osnabrueck in Germany. The first situation required that a decision be made between improving the everyday life of a handicapped person and offering education to intelligent children. The second situation required the respondents to take a decision between promoting economic growth at the expense of restricting basic human rights and a slower economic recovery with a full warranty for these human rights. The results show significant changes in the evaluative behaviour of the students over the period considered.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bar-Hillel, M. & M. Yaari (1993), “Judgments of Distributive Justice”, In: B.A. Mellers and J. Baron (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Gaertner, W. (1992), “Distributive Judgments” In: W. Gaertner and M. Klemisch-Ahlert (eds.), Social Choice and Bargaining Perspectives on Distributive Justice, chap. 2,Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag.

  • Gaertner, W. (2007), Empirical Social Choice, LSE Philosophy Papers ed.by M. Steuer, London

  • Gaertner, W. (2009), “Distributive Justice: An Overview of Experimental Evidence”, In: P.Anand, P.K.Pattanaik and C.Puppe (eds.), The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Gaertner, W. & J. Jungeilges (2002), “Evaluation via Extended Orderings: Empirical Findings from Western and Eastern Europe”, Social Choice and Welfare, 19: 29-55.

  • Gaertner, W.& L. Schwettmann (2007), “Equity, Responsibility and the Cultural Dimension”, Economica, 74:627-49.

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

  • Regenwetter, M., B. Grofman, A.A.J. Marley, & I.M. Tsetlin (2006), Behavioral Social Choice. Probabilistic Models, Statistical Inference and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schokkaert, E. (1999), “Tout-le-monde est ‘postwelfariste’: Opinions sur la justice redistributive”, Revue Economique 50: 811-31.

  • Sen, A.K. (1979), “Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: or What’s Wrong with Welfare Economics?” Economic Journal, 89: 537-58.

  • Yaari, M. E. & M. Bar-Hillel (1984), “On Dividing Justly”, Social Choice and Welfare,1: 1-24.


Abstract Views: 434

PDF Views: 0




  • A Questionnaire-Experimental Study of Equity Evaluations Over Time

Abstract Views: 434  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Wulf Gaertner
University of Osnabrueck, Germany

Abstract


Most of the studies in empirical social choice are snapshot-like. These studies do not allow to check whether the results found are intertemporally stable or not. The author presents here his findings which stretch over a period of roughly 15 years regarding the two situations that were given to (mostly) undergraduate students in economics and business administration at the University of Osnabrueck in Germany. The first situation required that a decision be made between improving the everyday life of a handicapped person and offering education to intelligent children. The second situation required the respondents to take a decision between promoting economic growth at the expense of restricting basic human rights and a slower economic recovery with a full warranty for these human rights. The results show significant changes in the evaluative behaviour of the students over the period considered.

References