Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organizational Commitment & Psychological Contract in Knowledge Sharing Behaviour


Affiliations
1 Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, India
2 Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, Ghana
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


How to foster knowledge sharing among employees so that companies can leverage their richest resource? The present paper examined the effect of organizational commitment and psychological contract on employees' knowledge sharing behaviour. The study conjectured that organizational commitment and psychological contract fulfilment would be positively related to knowledge sharing behaviour. Further, if employees perceive psychological contract breach, they will be less involved in knowledge sharing behaviour. A survey was conducted in different organizations from various industries such as IT, automobiles, FMCG etc. The findings of the study indicated that relational psychological contract positively influenced knowledge sharing behaviour. Organizational commitment, transactional psychological contract and psychological contract breach did not have significant influence on knowledge sharing behaviour.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al-Alawi, A.I. (2005), “The Practice and Challenges of Knowledge Management in Financial Sectors in Bahrain”, Asian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1): 101-07.
  • Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”, Management Information System Quarterly, 25(1): 107-36.
  • Anderson, N. & Schalk, R. (1998), “The Psychological Contract in Retrospect and Prospect”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 19: 637-47.
  • Andrews, K. & Delahaye, B.L. (2000), “Influences on Knowledge Processes in Organizational Learning: The psychosocial filter”, Journal of Management Studies, 73: 797-810.
  • Aranda, D. & Fernandez, L. (2002), “Determinants of Innovation through a Knowledge- Based Theory Lens”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5): 289-96.
  • Beijerse, R. (1999), “Questions in Knowledge Management: Defining and Conceptualizing a Phenomenon”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 (2): 94-110.
  • Bock, G-W.& Kim, Y-G. (2002), “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: an Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing”, Information Resources Management Journal, 15:14–21
  • Bock, G-W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y-G.& Lee, J-N. (2005), “Behavioural Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Role of Extrinsic Motivators, Social Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate”, MIS Quarterly, 29: 87–111.
  • Cabrera, A. & Cabrera, E.F. (2002), “Knowledge Sharing Dilemmas”, Organization Studies, 23(5): 687-710.
  • Ciborra, C.U.& Patriota, G. (1998), “Groupware and Teamwork in R&D: :Limits to Learning and Innovation”, R&D Management, 28(1):1-10.
  • Coleman, J.S. (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
  • Dalkir, K. (2005), Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, Elsevier, Oxford.
  • Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How organizations Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Drucker, P. (1993), The Post Capitalist Society. 1st ed., New York: Harper Business Press.
  • Empson, L. (2001), “Fear of Exploitation and Fear of Contamination: Impediments to Knowledge Transfer in Mergers between Professional Service Firms”, Human Relations, 54: 839-62.
  • Ensign, P.& Hebert, L. (2010), “How Reputation Affects Knowledge Sharing among Colleagues”,MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2):79.
  • Epple, D., Argote, L. & Murphy, K. (1996), “An Empirical Investigation of the Micro Structure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer through Learning by Doing”, Operation Research, 44(1): 77-86.
  • Flood, P., Turner, T. Ramamoorthy, N. & Pearson, J. (2001), “Causes and Consequences of Psychological Contracts among Knowledge Workers in the High Technology and Financial Services industries”, International journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7): 1152-61.
  • Ford, D. (2001), Trust and Knowledge Management: the Seeds of Success, Queen’s KBE Centre for Knowledge-Based Enterprises, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, available at:http:/business.queensu. ca/knowledge/workingpapers/working/ working_01-08.pdf.
  • Gammelgaard, J. & Ritter, T. (2000), Knowledge Retrieval Process in Multinational Consulting Firms, Danish Social Sciences Research Council, Frederiksberg, Denmark, available at: http://web.cbs.dk/departments/int/ seminarpapers/JG-Knowledge.pdf
  • Golden, Timothy, & Raghuram, Sumita. (2010), “Teleworker Knowledge Sharing and the Role of Altered Relational and Technological Interactions”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 31(8): 1061
  • Gupta, B., Sharma, N.K. & Ganesh, C. (2009), “The Influence of Organizational Cultural Values, Reward, Time, Self esteem & Job Security on Knowledge Sharing Intention among Employees”, Int. J. of Indian Culture and Business Management, 2 (2): 125-43.
  • Hall, H. (2003), “Borrowed Theory: Applying Exchange Theories in Information Science Research”, Library and Information Science Research, 25(3):287-306.
  • Han, Tzu-Shian, Chiang, Hsu-Hsin& Chang, Aihwa (2010), “Employee Participation in Decision Making, Psychological Ownership and Knowledge Sharing: Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in Taiwanese High-tech Organizations”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12): 2218
  • Herriot, P., Manning, W. & Kidd, J. (1997), “The Content of the Psychological Contract”, British Journal of Management, 8 (2):151-62.
  • Hislop, D. (2002), “Managing Knowledge and the Problem of Commitment”, Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, ALBA, Athens.
  • Hui, C., Lee, C. & Rousseau, D.M. (2004), “Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in China: Investigating Generalizability and Instrumentality”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2): 311- 21.
  • Jarvenpaa, S.L. & Staples, D.S. (2001), “Exploring Perceptions of Organizational Ownership of Information and Expertise”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 151-83
  • Kelloway, E.K and Barling, J. (2000), “Knowledge Work as Organizational Behaviour”, Framework paper 0003, Queen’s Management Research Centre for Knowledge-Based Enterprises, Kingston, Canada, available at: www.business.queensu.ca/kbe, accessed October 2002.
  • Kickul, J. (2001), “When Organizations Break Their Promises: Employee Reactions to Unfair Processes and Treatment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 29:289-307.
  • Kim, W. & Mauborgne, R. (1998), “Procedural justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy”, Strategic Management Journal, 19: 323-38.
  • Leana, C.R. & Van Buren, H.J. (1999), “Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (3): 538-55.
  • Lee, J.N. (2001), “The Impact of Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Capability and Partnership Quality on Outsourcing Success”, Information and Management, 38(5): 323-35.
  • MacNeil, I.R. (1985), “Relational Contract: What We Do and Do not Know”, Wisconsin Law Review, 3 :483-525
  • Maertz, C.P. & Griffeth, R.P. (2004), “Eight Motivational Forces and Voluntary Turnover: a Theoretical Synthesis with Implications for Research”, Journal of Management, 30:667-83.
  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V. & Zaheer, A. (2003), “Trust as an Organizing Principle”, Organization Science, 14: 91-103.
  • Millward, L.J. & Brewerton, P.M. (1999), Validation of the Psychological Contract Scale in Organisational Settings, unpublished paper, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
  • Millward, L.J. & Hopkins, L.J. (1998), “Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 28: 1530-56.
  • Morris, T. (2001), “Asserting Property Rights: Knowledge Codification in the Professional Service Firm”, Human Relations, 54 (7): 819-38.
  • Morrison, E.W. & Robinson, S.L. (1997), “When Employees Feel Betrayed: a Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops”, Academy of Management Review, 16: 92-120.
  • Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1979), “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour,14: 224-47.
  • Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 242-66.
  • Newell, S. & Swan, J. (2000), “Trust and Interorganizational Networking”, Human Relations, 53: 1287-327.
  • Nonaka, I. (1994). “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, Organizational Science, 5 (1): 17-37.
  • Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G. & Voelpel, S. (2006) “Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances”, Organization Studies, 27(8):179–208.
  • Oliver, G. (2008), “Information Culture: Exploration of Differing Values and Attitudes to Information in Organisations”, Journal of Documentation, 64(3):363-85.
  • O’Neill, Bonnie, S., & Adya, Monica (2007), “Knowledge Sharing and the Psychological Contract; Managing Knowledge Workers across Different Stages of Employment, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(4): 411
  • Pate, J., Martin, G.& McGoldrick, J. (2003), “The Impact of Psychological Contract Violation on Employee Attitudes and Behaviour”, Employee Relations, 25(6):557-73.
  • Renzl, B. (2008), “Trust in Management and Knowledge Sharing: The Mediating Effects of Fear and Knowledge Documentation”, Omega. 36(2): 206
  • Robinson, S.L., & Morrison, E.W. (2000), “The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21:525-46.
  • Robinson, S.L., Kraatz, M.S.& Rousseau, D.M. (1994), “Changing Obligations and the Psychological Contract: a Longitudinal Study”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(1):137-52
  • Robertson, M. & O’Malley, Hammersley, G. (2000), “Knowledge Management Practices within a Knowledge-Intensive Firm: the Significance of the People Management Dimension”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 24(24): 241-53.
  • Robinson, S.L &, Rousseau, D.M. (1994), “Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception, the Norm”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15:245-59.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989), “Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations”, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2): 121-39.
  • Rousseau, D.M. & McLean Parks, J. (1993), “The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 15:1-43.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreement, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (2004), “Psychological Contracts in the Workplace: Understanding the Ties that Motivate”, Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 120-27.
  • Rousseau, D.M. (1990), “New Hire Perceptions of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11(5): 389.
  • Rousseau, D.M. & Schalk, R. (2000), “Introduction”, in Rousseau, D.M. and Schalk, R. (Eds), Psychological Contracts: Cross-national Perspectives, Sage, London, pp. 1-28.
  • Scarbrough, H. (1999), “Knowledge as Work: Conflicts in the Management of Knowledge Wo r k e r s ” , Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 11(1): 5-16.
  • Smith, H.A. & McKeen, J.D. (2002), “Instilling a Knowledge-Sharing Culture”, Proceedings of the third European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, ALBA, Athens.
  • Styhre, A. (2002), “The Knowledge-intensive Company and the Economy of Sharing: Rethinking Utility and Knowledge Management”, Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4): 228-236.
  • Storey, J. and Quintas, P. (2001), “Knowledge Management and HRM”, in Storey, J. (Ed.), Human Resource Management: A Critical Text, Thomson Learning, London.
  • Szulanski, G. (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, (17): 27-44.
  • Sveiby, K.E. (1997), The New Organization Wealth, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
  • Syed-Ikhsan, S. & Rowland, F. (2004), “Knowledge Management in Public Organizations: a Study on the Relationship between Organizational Elements and the Performance of Knowledge Transfer”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(2): 95-111.
  • Thite, M. (2004), “Strategic Positioning of HRM in Knowledge-based Organizations”, The Learning Organization, 11(1): 28-44.
  • Turnley, W.H., Bolino, M.C., Lester, S.W & Bloodgood, J.M. (2003), “The Impact of Psychological Contract Fulfilment on the Performance of In-role and Organizational Citizenship Behaviours”, Journal of Management, 29(2):187-206.
  • Widén-Wulff, G., Ginman, M. (2004), “Explaining Knowledge Sharing in Organizations through the Dimensions of Social Capital”, Journal of Information Science, 30(5):448- 58.
  • Wiig, K. (2004), People-Focused Knowledge Management, Elsevier, Oxford.
  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S.J., Glibkowsky, B.C. & Bravo, J. (2007), “The Impact of Psychological Contract Breach on Work-Related Outcomes: a Meta-analysis”, Personnel Psychology, 60(3):647-80.

Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 0




  • Organizational Commitment & Psychological Contract in Knowledge Sharing Behaviour

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bindu Gupta
Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, India
Arushi Agarwal
Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, India
Piyush Samaria
Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, India
Punit Sarda
Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, India
Rishab Bucha
Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad, Ghana

Abstract


How to foster knowledge sharing among employees so that companies can leverage their richest resource? The present paper examined the effect of organizational commitment and psychological contract on employees' knowledge sharing behaviour. The study conjectured that organizational commitment and psychological contract fulfilment would be positively related to knowledge sharing behaviour. Further, if employees perceive psychological contract breach, they will be less involved in knowledge sharing behaviour. A survey was conducted in different organizations from various industries such as IT, automobiles, FMCG etc. The findings of the study indicated that relational psychological contract positively influenced knowledge sharing behaviour. Organizational commitment, transactional psychological contract and psychological contract breach did not have significant influence on knowledge sharing behaviour.

References