Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Multi-dimensional Approach to Union Effectiveness- Case Studies from Indonesia & Malaysia


Affiliations
1 Dept of Management, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Industrial Relations Program, School of Social Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia, Malaysia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The success of an organisation is measured by the term organisation effectiveness. In the literature, the concept of union effectiveness attempts to indicate how well unions perform in achieving their goals and there is emphasis on the importance of using multiple criteria to assess organisation effectiveness. However, only a few studies have utilised multidimensional measures of union effectiveness. This article explores the application of a comprehensive measure of union effectiveness at workplace. The authors use the Spatial Model that employs complete and balanced indicators of effectiveness. Empirical data are provided from a research at postal companies in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amante, M. S. V. (2003), ASEAN Industrial Relations: Is a Regional Framework Possible? Philippines: University of Philippines School of Labour and Industrial Relations.

  • Aminuddin, M. (2003), Malaysian Industrial Relations and Employment Law (3rd ed.). Malaysia: McGraw- Hill.

  • Batubara, M. (2004), Divestasi Indosat - Kebusukan Sebuah Rezim, ILUNI Jakarta BPS. (2005), Population and Type of Activity 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005, Retrieved 30 December 2005, from http:// www.bps.go.id/sector/employ/table1.shtml

  • Boreham, P.& Hall, R. (1994), “Trade-Union Strategy in Contemporary Capitalism - the Microeconomic and Macroeconomic Implications of Political Unionism”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 15(3): 313-53.

  • Boxall, P. & Haynes, P. (1997), “Strategy and Trade Union Effectiveness in a Neo-Liberal Environment”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35(4): 567-91.

  • Bronfenbrenner, K. (1997), “The Role of Union Strategies in NLRB Certification Elections”, Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 50(2): 195-212.

  • Burchielli, R. (2004), “It’s Not Just Numbers’: Union Employees’ Perceptions of Union Effectiveness”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 46: 337-44.

  • Cahyono, E. (2003), “Perburuhan dari masa ke masa: Jaman kolonial Belanda sampai Orde Baru (1998)”, in H. D. Oey (ed.), Gerakan Serikat Buruh. Jakarta: Hasta Mitra.

  • Cameron, K. S. & Whetten, D. A. (1983), Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models, Academic Press, New York

  • Charlwood, A. (2004), “Influences on Trade Union Organizing Effectiveness in Britain”. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42: 69-93.

  • Cherrington, D. J. & Dyer, W. G. (2003), Organizational Effectiveness (3rd ed.), Provo, UT, USA: Creative Works Office, Brigham Young University.

  • Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J. & Deutsch, S. J. (1980), Organizational Effectiveness: A Multiple-Constituency Approach, Academy of Management Review, 5(2): 211-17.

  • Courtney, R. (2002), Strategic Management for Voluntary Non-profit Organizations. Routledge, New York.

  • Daft, R. L. (2004), Organization Theory and Design, (8th ed.), Mason, Ohio: South-Western, Thomson Learning.

  • Depnakertrans (2005), Daftar Federasi Serikat Pekerja (List of Labour Unions), Jakarta.

  • Depnakertrans (2006), Survei Serikat Pekerja, Jakarta.

  • DoSM. (2005), Key Statistics - Employment. Retrieved 16 February, 2007, from http:// www. s t a t i s t i c s . g o v. m y / e n g l i s h / frameset_keystats.php.

  • Fiorito, J. & Jarley, P. (1995). “National Union Effectiveness in Organizing: Measures and Influences”, Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 48(4): 613-34.

  • Fiorito, J., Jarley, P. & Delaney, J. T. (1993a), “National Union Effectiveness”, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 12: 111- 37.

  • Fiorito, J., Jarley, P. & Delaney, J. T. (1993b), “Organizing Effectiveness among U.S. National Unions”, Academy of Management Proceedings: 111-15.

  • Fiorito, J., Jarley, P. & Delaney, J. T. (2002), “Information Technology, U.S. Union Organizing and Union Effectiveness”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(4): 627- 58.

  • Firdanianty, & Handayani, T. (2004), Pergulatan Posindo Menghindari Kematian, Retrieved 25 May, 2005, from http://www.swa.co.id/

  • Ford, M. T. (2003), Labour NGO as Outside Intellectual: A History of Non-Governmental Organisations’ Role in the Indonesian Labour, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.

  • Frege, C. M. (2002), “Understanding Union Effectiveness in Central Eastern Europe: Hungary and Slovenia”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1): 53-76.

  • Gahan, P. & Bell, S. (1999), “Union Strategy, Membership Orientation and Union Effectiveness: An Exploratory Analysis”, Labour & Industry, 9(3): 5-30.

  • Gardner, M. (1989), “Union Strategy: A Gap in Union Theory”, in G. W. Ford, and D. Plowman (eds), Australian Unions: An industrial Relations Perspective, (2nd ed.): 49- 73, South Melbourne, Vic: Macmillan.

  • Gummesson, E. (1991), Qualitative Methods in Management Research, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

  • Gumilar, R. (2003), Ini adalah pilihan terbaik untuk kita semua, Retrieved 3 June, 2005, from http://www.posindonesia.co.id/news/ isi.php?no=66&i=3

  • Harrison, M. I. (2005), Diagnosing Organizations: Methods, Models, and Processes (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

  • Hartley, J. (2004), “Case Study Research”, in C. Casell, C., & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, London: Sage Publications.

  • Hammer, T. H., & Wazeter, D. L. (1993), “Dimensions of Local Union Effectiveness”, Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 46(2): 302-19.

  • Hopkin, J. (2002), “Comparative Methods”, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science (2nd edn), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Joesman. (2005), The Development of The Postal Sector in Indonesia and Future Prospect of Postal Workers (Presentation material), Savoy Homan Hotel: Indonesian Postal Workers Union.

  • Kelly, D. (eds.) (1999), Researching Industrial Relations, NSW: The Federation Press.

  • Kompas (2001a), Kiriman Terlambat, Pekerja Pos Minta Maaf, 5 April

  • Kompas (2001b), Pegawai Pos Unjuk Rasa, Pelayanan Terhenti. 3 April

  • Kompas (2002), Amien: Kalau Tidak Terpaksa, Jangan Jual Aset Negara, 5 April

  • Kompas (2004), Membangun Daya Saing Industri Postel, 8 May

  • Kompas (2005), Karyawan PT Pos Demo di depan Istana, 6 July

  • Kuruvilla, S., Das, S., Kwon, H. & Kwon, S. (2002), “Trade Union Growth and Decline in Asia”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3): 431-61.

  • Layuck, J. R. (2002), “PT Pos Indonesia: Hak “Haram” Monopoli atau “Hantu” Globalisasi, Kompas, 2 July

  • MI Online. (2005), Tercatat 109.382 Pekerja Di- P.H.K Pada 2005. Retrieved 21 December, 2005, from http://www.media indonesia.com/.

  • MoHR. (2005), Statistical Summary of Labour and Human Resource, Retrieved 15 February, 2007, from http://www.mohr.gov.my/ makluman/key.htm#11.

  • Nissen, B. (2003), “Alternative Strategic Directions for the U.S. Labor Movement”, Labor Studies Journal, 28(1): 133-55.

  • Ostroff, C. & Schmitt, N. (1993), “Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency”, Academy of Management Journal, 36:1345-61.

  • Parasuraman,B., Aryana Satrya, Balan Rathakrishnan & Balakrishnan Muniapan (2009), “Analysing the Relationship between Unions and Joint Consultation Committee: Case Studies of Malaysian and Indonesian Postal Industries”, International Journal of Business and Society, 1 (1).

  • Parasuraman, B. & Aryana Satrya (2008), “Relaciones De Trabajo En Los paises De APEC: Relaciones Laborales en ASEAN.Una Visiosn General, Segunda Parte (ASEAN Industrial Relations : An Overview) “ Analisis Laboral, XXXII (374), Agosto:14-20. (in Spanish, Peru).

  • Parasuraman, B. (2004), Malaysian Industrial Relations: A Critical Analysis, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Pearson/Prentice Hall

  • Posindo. (2003), Statement of Corporate Intent P.T. Pos Indonesia (Persero), Retrieved 15 May, 2005, from http:/ www. p o s i n d o n e s i a . c o . i d / n e w s / isi.php?no=29&i=6

  • Pyman, A. (2002), “Union Effectiveness: Theorising a Set of Dimensions”, Paper Presented at the 16th Conference of the Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ) Conference, Queenstown.

  • Quinn, R. E. & Cameron, K. (1983), “Organizational Life Cycles and Shifting Criteria of Effectiveness: Some Preliminary Evidence”, Management Science, 29(1): 33-51.

  • Quinn, R. E. & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983), “A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis”, Management Science, 29:363-77.

  • Robbins, S.P. & Barnwell. N. (1994), Organization Theory in Australia, (2nd ed.). New York, Sydney: Prentice Hall.

  • Satrya, A. (2006), “Union Strategy and Union Effectiveness in Indonesia”, Paper Presented at the 20th Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand (AIRAANZ) Conference, Adelaide, 4-6 February.

  • Satrya, A. & B. Parasuraman (2007), “Union Strategy in the Indonesian and Malaysian Postal Industries”, Employment Relations Record, 7(2):31-45.

  • Sharma, B. (1996), Industrial Relations in ASEAN: a Comparative Study (rev.ed.), Fredericton, NB: Management Futures.

  • SMERU (2002), Industrial Relations in Jabotabek, Bandung, and Surabaya during the Freedom to Organize Era. Jakarta: SMERU Research Team.

  • SPPI. (2003). Jernihkan hati endapkan emosi dalam menyelesaikan masalah tanpa masalah. Retrieved 13 May, 2005, from http://www.posindonesia.co.id/news/ isi.php?no=92&i=1

  • Sutanto. (1998), The Impact of Industrial Relations on Worker’s Welfare in Indonesia, Unpublished PhD, University of Glamorgan, Glamorgan.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.


Abstract Views: 336

PDF Views: 0




  • Multi-dimensional Approach to Union Effectiveness- Case Studies from Indonesia & Malaysia

Abstract Views: 336  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Aryana Satrya
Dept of Management, Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Balakrishnan Parasuraman
Industrial Relations Program, School of Social Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah, Malaysia, Malaysia

Abstract


The success of an organisation is measured by the term organisation effectiveness. In the literature, the concept of union effectiveness attempts to indicate how well unions perform in achieving their goals and there is emphasis on the importance of using multiple criteria to assess organisation effectiveness. However, only a few studies have utilised multidimensional measures of union effectiveness. This article explores the application of a comprehensive measure of union effectiveness at workplace. The authors use the Spatial Model that employs complete and balanced indicators of effectiveness. Empirical data are provided from a research at postal companies in Indonesia and Malaysia.

References