Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of Pay for Performance on Employee Engagement & Turnover Intention


Affiliations
1 Bennett University, Greater Noida & is a Post-Doctoral Fellow, ICSSR at India Institute of Technology Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between pay for performance, turnover intention and employee engagement with the social exchange theory. Structured questionnaire was used to get the data from 271 employees. The findings exhibit that pay for performance is positively related to turnover intention and employee engagement.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anitha, J. (2014), “Determinants of Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63 (3): 308-23.

  • Baker, G., III. (1993),”Perspective: Rethinking Rewards”,Harvard Business Review, 71(6): 37.

  • Balducci, C., Fraccaroli, F. &Schaufeli, W. B. (2010),”Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9): A Cross-cultural Analysis”, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(2): 143-49.

  • Baumgartner, H. & Homburg, C. (1996),”Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review”, International journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2): 139-61.

  • Bhattacharyya, D. K. (2013),”Performance-related Pay: Evidence-based Studies in Indian Central Public Sector Enterprises”, Compensation & Benefits Review, 45(4): 215-22.

  • Blau, P.M. (1964), ”Justice in Social Exchange”, Sociological Inquiry, 34(2):193-206.

  • Bloom, M. (1999),”The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 25-40.

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1992), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit”, Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2): 230-58.

  • Bustamam, F. L., Teng, S. S. & Abdullah, F. Z. (2014),”Reward Management and Job Satisfaction Among Frontline Employees in Hotel Industry in Malaysia”, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 144(1): 392-402.

  • Cameron, K. & Dutton, J. (Eds.) (2003), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • Condly, S. J., Clark, R. E. & Stolovitch, H. D. (2003), “The Effects of Incentives on Workplace Performance: A Meta analytic Review of Research Studies”, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 16(3): 46-63.

  • Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R. & Hall, A. V. (2017), “Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review WithTheoretical Remedies”, Academy of Management Annals, 11(1): 479-516.

  • Desai, M. (2008). “Reservations; Compulsions &Contradictions”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2): 149-53.

  • Fang, M. & Gerhart, B. (2012), “Does Pay for P er fo rma n ce D imi n i sh I n t rin s i c Interest?”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6): 1176-96.

  • Fischer, R. (2008),”Rewarding Seniority: Exploring Cultural and Organizational Predictors of Seniority Allocations”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2): 167-86.

  • Flint, D., Haley, L.M. &McNally, J.J. (2013). “Individual and Organizational Determinants of Turnover Intent”, Personnel Review, 42 (5): 552-72.

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3): 382-88.

  • Gerhart, B. & Milkovich, G. T. (1990), “Organizational Differences in Managerial Compensation and Financial Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 663-91.

  • Gerhart, B.& Rynes, S. (2003), Compensation: Theory, Evidence and Strategic Implications, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Gerhart, B., Rynes, S. L. & Fulmer, I. S. (2009), “Payand Performance: Individuals, Groups, and Executives”, Academy of Management Annals, 3(1): 251-315.

  • Gibson, V. M. (1995),”The New Employee Reward System”,Management Review, 84(2): 13–18.

  • Gielen, A. C., Kerkhofs, M. J. & Van Ours, J. C. (2010),”How Performance Related Pay Affects Productivity and Employment”, Journal of Population Economics, 23(1): 291-301.

  • Gomez-Mejia, L. R. &Balkin, D. B. (1992),”Determinants of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 35(5): 921-55.

  • González-Romá, V., Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. &Lloret, S. (2006), “Burnout and Work Engagement: Independent Factors or Opposite Poles?”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1): 165-74.

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”, American Sociological Review, 25(2): 161-78.

  • Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W. &Gaertner, S. (2000), “A Meta-analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium”, Journal of Management, 26(3): 463-88.

  • Gupta, R. K. & Panda, A. (2003), “Individualized Familial Self: the Evolving Self of Qualified Technocrats in India”, Psychology and Developing Societies, 15(1): 1-29.

  • Hakanen, J. J. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012), “Do Burnout and Work Engagement Predict Depressive Symptoms and Life Satisfaction? A Three-wave Seven-year Prospective Study”, Journal of Affective Disorders, 141(2-3): 415-24.

  • Hinkin, T. R. & Tracey, J. B. (2000), “The Cost of Turnover: Putting a Price on The Learning Curve”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 41(3): 14-21.

  • Hofstede, G. (1991), ”Empirical Models of Cultural Differences”, in N. Bleichrodt & P. J. D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in C r o ss- cu l t u r al P sych o lo gy, S wet s & Zeitlinger Publishers.

  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Hom, P. W., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G. E. & Griffeth, R. W. (1992), “A Meta-analytical Structural Equations Analysis of a Model of Employee Turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6): 890-909.

  • Innstrand, S. T., Langballe, E. M.&Falkum, E. (2012), “A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Work Engagement and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression”, Stress and Health, 28(1): 1-10.

  • Irving, P. G., Coleman, D. F. & Cooper, C. L. (1997), “Further Assessments of a ThreeComponent Model of Occupational Commitment: Generalizability and Differences Across Occupations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 444-52.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990), “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1992), “To Be Fully There: Psychological Presence at Work”, Human Relations, 45(4): 321-49.

  • Kim, H. & Gong, Y. (2009), “The Roles of Tacit Knowledge and OCB in The Relationship B et ween Group b ased Pay and Firm Performance”, Human Resource Management Journal, 19(2): 120-39.

  • Kunz, A. H. & Pfaff, D. (2002), “Agency Theory, Performance Evaluation, and the Hypothetical Construct of Intrinsic Motivation”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3): 275-95.

  • Kuvaas, B., Shore, L. M., Buch, R. & Dysvik, A. (2020), “Social and Economic Exchange Relationships and Performance Contingency: Differential Effects of Variable Pay and Base Pay”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(3): 408-31.

  • Lawler EE, III. (1971), Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological View, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Lazear, E. P. (1995), Personnel Economics (Vol.1993). MIT Press.

  • Lazear EP. (1999), Personnel Economics: Past lessons and Future Directions, Journal of Labor Economics, 17: 199–215.

  • Lazear, E. P. (2000), “Performance Pay and Productivity”, The American Economic Review, 90(5): 1346-61.

  • Lazear, E. P. & Rosen, S. (1981), “Rank-order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts”, Journal of Political Economy, 89(5): 841-64.

  • Littman-Ovadia, H. & Balducci, C. (2013), “Psychometric Properties of the Hebrew Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9)”, European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 29(1): 58-63.

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2001), “Job Burnout”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1): 397- 422.

  • Mobley, W. H. (1977), “Intermediate Linkages in The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2): 237-40.

  • Ogbonnaya, C., Daniels, K. & Nielsen, K. (2017), “Does Contingent Pay Encourage Positive Employee Attitudes and Intensify Work?” Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1): 94-112.

  • Pink, D. (2009), Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us, New York: Penguin Group.

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998), “Six Dangerous Myths About Pay”, Harvard Business Review, 76(3): 109-20.

  • Pfeffer, J. & Jeffrey, P. (1998), The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First, Harvard Business Press.

  • Prendergast, C. (2008),”Intrinsic Motivation and Incentives”. American Economic Review, 98(2): 201-05.

  • Rigby, D. (2001),”Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey”, California Management Review, 43(2): 139-60.

  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S. & Hayday, S. (2004), The Drivers of Employee Engagement, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

  • Rothbard, N. P. (2001),”Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 655-84.

  • Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T. & Greenberg, J. (2006),”I-deals: Idiosyncratic Terms in Employment Relationships”, Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 977-94.

  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B. & Parks, L. (2005), “Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance”, Annual Review of Psychology, 56: 571-600.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology,21(7): 600-19.

  • Saks, A.M. & Rotman, J. L. (2006), “Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-19.

  • Schuster, J. R. & Zingheim, P. (1992), New Pay: Linking Employee and Organizational Performance, Lexington Books, New York.

  • Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A. & Schaufeli, W. (2009), “The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4): 459-81.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006), “The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-national Study”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4): 701-16.

  • Schaufeli, W. &Salanova, M. (2011), “Work Engagement: On How to Better Catch a Slippery Concept”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1): 39-46.

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002), “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1): 71-92.

  • Shaw, J. D., Dineen, B. R., Fang, R. &Vellella, R. F. (2009), “Employee-organization Exchange Relationships, HRM Practices, and Quit Rates of Good and Poor Performers”, Academy of Management Journal, 52(5): 1016-33.

  • Shaw, J. D. & Gupta, N. (2007), “Pay System Characteristics and Quit Patterns of Good, Average and Poor Performers”, Personnel Psychology, 60(4): 903-28.

  • Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kamiyama, K. & Kawakami, N. (2015), “Workaholism vs. Work Engagement: The Two Different Predictors of Future Well-being and Performance”, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(1): 18-23.

  • Shore, L.M., Tetrick, L.E., Lynch, P. & Barksdale, K. (2006), “Social and Economic Exchange, Construct Development and Validation”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36: 837-67

  • Sinha, J. B. (2009), Culture and Organizational Behavior.SAGE Publications India.

  • Singh, A. K. (2009), “HRD Practices &Organization Culture in India”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2): 243-54.

  • Society for Human Resource Management (2014), Job Satisfaction and Engagement Survey, Alexandria,VA http://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Documents/14-0028% 20JobSatEngage_ Report_FULL_FNL.pdf.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Trevor, C. O., Gerhart, B. & Boudreau, J. W. (1997), “Voluntary Turnover and Job Performance: Curvilinearity and The Moderating Influences of Salary Growth and Promotions”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1): 44.

  • Wang, X., Wang, L., Xu, X. & Ji, P. (2014), “Identifying Employee Turnover Risks Using Modified Quality Function Deployment”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(3); 398-404.


Abstract Views: 99

PDF Views: 0




  • Influence of Pay for Performance on Employee Engagement & Turnover Intention

Abstract Views: 99  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shweta Mittal
Bennett University, Greater Noida & is a Post-Doctoral Fellow, ICSSR at India Institute of Technology Delhi, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between pay for performance, turnover intention and employee engagement with the social exchange theory. Structured questionnaire was used to get the data from 271 employees. The findings exhibit that pay for performance is positively related to turnover intention and employee engagement.

References