Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Examining Intercultural Sensitivity in the Indian Context


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Resource and Organization Behavior at Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this study is to empirically examine Chen and Starosta’s five-factor model of Intercultural Sensitivity in the Indian context and assess the factors that affect Indian’s Intercultural Sensitivity in a workplace. In the process the study reproduces a valid scale. Results indicate that Chen and Starosta’s fivefactor model did not fit in the Indian context. The study proposed a three-factor model based on 14 of the 24 items Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) formulated by Chen and Starosta. The Indian Intercultural Sensitivity (IIS) model proposed as an alternative exhibited high internal consistency, reliability, and validity and indicates better fit with Indian culture.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adler, N. J.&Jelink, M. (1986), “Is ‘Organizational Culture’ Culture-bound?” Human Resource Management, 25 (1): 73-90.

  • Adler, R. B.& Towne, N. (1987), Looking in/ Looking out, New York: Holt, Rinehart,and Winston.

  • Adler, R. B.& Towne, N. (1993), Looking Out/ Looking In,Orlando Fla.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  • Bennett, J. M. (1986), “Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Competence”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27: 421-43.

  • Bennett, J. M. (1993), “Cultural Marginality: Identity Issues in Intercultural Training”, Education for the Intercultural Experience, 2:109-35.

  • Bennett, J. M.& Bennett, M. J. (2004), “An Integrative Approach to Global and Domestic Diversity”, In Landis, D., Bennett, J. M. and Bennett, M., J. (eds.) Handbook of Intercultural Training. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Bhawuk, D. P. S.&Brislin, R. (1992), “The Measurement of Intercultural Sensitivity Using theConcepts ofIndividualism and Collectivism”,International Journal of InterculturalRelations,16:413-36.

  • Bhawuk, D. P., Sakuda, K. H.&Munusamy, V. P. (2008),”Intercultural Competence Development and Triple-loop Cultural Learning”, Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Method, and Applications, Armonk, NY:Sharpe.

  • Budhwar, P. S. (2003), “Employment Relations in India”, Employee Relations, 25 (2): 132-48.

  • Bronfenbrener, U., Harding, J& Gallwey, M. (1958),”The Measurement of Skill in SocialPerception”,in McClelland, D.C. (Ed.),Talent and Society, NY: Van Nostrand.

  • Bryan, J. H. (1999),”The Diversity Imperative Managing People Well Is the Top Priority”,Executive Excellence, 16: 6.

  • Chen, G. M. & Starosta, W. (1998),”A Review of the Concept of Intercultural Awareness”, Human Communication, 2: 27-54.

  • Canen, A. G.&Canen, A. (1999),”Logistics and Cultural Diversity: Hand in Hand for OrganizationalSuccess”,Cross-Cultural Management: an International Journal, 6(1): 3-10.

  • Census (2011) accessed at http://www.censusin dia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html on 18 Jul 18.

  • Chen, Guo-Ming& William J. Starosta(1997), “Chinese Conflict Management and Resolution: Overview and Implications”, Intercultural Communication Studies, 7: 1-16.

  • Chen, G. M.&Starosta, W. J. (2000),”The Development and Validation of the Intercultural Communication Sensitivity Scale”, Human Communication, 3:1-15.

  • Darawong, C.&Igel, B. (2012), “Acculturation of Local New Product Development Team Members in MNC Subsidiaries in Thailand”,Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 24(3): 351-71.

  • Economic Survey of India. (2017),accessed from http://www.businestandard.com/budget/article/ download-full-economic-survey-2017-117013100701_1.html on 03 Feb 18.

  • Esty, K. C., Griffin, R.&Hirsch, M. S. (1995), “Workplace Diversity”, Adams Media.

  • Fritz, W., Möllenberg, A.& Chen, G. M. (2002),”Measuring Intercultural Sensitivity in Different Cultural Contexts”, Intercultural Communication Studies, 11:165-76.

  • Fritz, W., Graf, A., Hentze, J., Mollenberg, A.& Chen, G. M. (2005),”An Examination of Chen and Starosta’s Model of Intercultural Sensitivity in Germany and the United States”,Intercultural Communication Studies, 14(1): 53-65.

  • George, J. M.& Jones, G. R. (1996),”The Experience of Work and Turnover Intentions: Interactive Effects of Value Attainment, Job Satisfaction, and Positive Mood”,Journal of Applied Psychology,81(3): 318.

  • Hart, R. P., Carlson, R. E.& Eadie, W. F. (1980), “Attitudes Toward Communication and the Assessment of Rhetorical Sensitivity”, Communications Monographs, 47(1): 1-22.

  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J.& Wiseman, R. (2003),”Measuring Intercultural Sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4): 421-43.

  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H.& Bell, M. P. (1998), “Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface and DeeplevelDiversity on Work Group Cohesion”,Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029-45.

  • Hart, W. B. (1996), “A Brief History of Intercultural Communication: A Paradigmatic Approach”,in Speech Communication Association Convention, San Die-go.

  • Hofstede, G. (1990),”A Reply and Comment on Joginder P. Singh:’Managerial Culture and Work-related Values in India’”, Organization Studies, 11(1): 103-06.

  • Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, (2nd ed), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

  • Hofstede, G. (1991), Cultures and Organizations. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival, Software of the Mind, London, Mc Graw-Hill.

  • Kelley, C. & Meyers, J.E. (1995), The Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory, National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Kealey, D.J.&Protheroe, D.R. (1996), “The Effectiveness of Cross-cultural Training for Expatriates: anAssessment of the Literature on the Issue”, International Journal of Intercultural Relationships,20:141-65.

  • Kundu, S. C. (2001).”Managing Cross-cultural Diversity”,Delhi Business Review, 2(2): 27-34.

  • Linguistic Survey of India (2011), accessed at http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-documents/ lsi/ling_survey_india.html on 21 Jan 16.

  • Matsumoto, D., LeRoux, J., Ratzlaff, C., Tatani, H., Uchida, H., Kim, C. & Araki, S. (2001),”Development and Validation of a Measure of Intercultural Adjustment Potential in Japanese Sojourners: The Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS)”,International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(5): 483-510.

  • Mahon, J.A. &Cushner, K. (2014), “Revising and Updating the Inventory of Cross-cultural Sensitivity”,Intercultural Education, 25 (6): 484-96.

  • Molinsky, A. (2007), “Cross-Cultural CodeSwitching: The Psychological Challenges of Adapting Behavior in Foreign Cultural Interactions”, Academy of Management Review, 32(2),:622-40.

  • Panda, A. & Gupta, R. K. (2004),”Mapping Cultural Diversity Within India: A Meta-analysis of Some Recent Studies”,Global Business Review, 5(1): 27-49.

  • Price Water House Cooper. (2016),”India Manufacturing Barometer: Winds of Change”, http://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2013/india-manufacturing-barometer.pdfaccessed on 16 Jan 18.

  • Roberge, M.E.& Dick, R.V. (2010), “Recognizing the Benefits of Diversity: When and How Does Diversity Increase Group Performance?” Human Resource Management Review, 20: 295-08.

  • Stahl, G.K., Maznevski, M., Voight, A.&Jonsen, K. (2010), “Unraveling the Effects of Cultural Diversity in Teams: A Meta-analysis of Research on Multicultural Work Groups”, Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 690-709.

  • Sinha, J. B., Vohra, N., Singhal, S., Sinha, R. B. N.&Ushashree, S. (2002), “Normative Predictions of Collectivist individualist Intentions and Behavior of Indians”, International Journal of Psychology, 37 (5): 309-19.

  • Sinha, J. B., Daftuar, C. N., Gupta, R. K., Mishra, R. C., Jayseetha, R., Jha, S. S.& Vijayakumar, V. S. R. (1994), “Regional Similarities and Differences in People’s Beliefs, Practices and Preferences”, Psychology and Developing Societies,6 (2):131-49.

  • Sinha, J. B. (2004), Multinationals in India: Managing the Interface of Cultures”, SAGE Publications India.

  • Sinha, J. B.& Sinha, D. (1990), “Role of SocialValues in Indian Organizations”, International Journal of Psychology, 25(3-6): 705-14.

  • Simmons, Michael, (1996), New Leadership for Women and Men - Building an Inclusive Organization, England: Gower Publishing Ltd.

  • Torres, C.&Bruxelles, M. (1992), “Capitalizing on Global Diversity”,HR Magazine, 37:30-30.

  • Tamam, E.(2010), “Examining Chen and Starosta’s Model ofIntercultural Sensitivity in a MultiracialCollectivistic Country”, Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39 (3): 173-83.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1977),”InterpersonalBehavior”, Monterey, Calif:Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989),”The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts”, Psychological Review, 96(3): 506.

  • Van, de, Vijver, F. J.& Leung, K. (2000),”Methodological Issues in Psychological Research on cCulture”,Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,31(1): 33-51.

  • Van, Prooijen, J. W.&Van, Der,Kloot, W. A. (2001),”Confirmatory Analysis of Exploratively Obtained Factor

  • Structures”,Educational and Psychological Measurement,61(5): 777-92.

  • Van, de,Vijver, F. J. &Poortinga, Y. H. (2002),”Structural Equivalence in Multilevel Research”,Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2):141-56.

  • Wu, J. F. (2015), “Examining Chen and Starosta’sModel of Intercultural Sensitivity in the Taiwanese Cultural Context”, International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 7 (6): 1


Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 0




  • Examining Intercultural Sensitivity in the Indian Context

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ashish Badola
Department of Human Resource and Organization Behavior at Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, India
Rakesh K. Agrawal
Department of Human Resource and Organization Behavior at Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to empirically examine Chen and Starosta’s five-factor model of Intercultural Sensitivity in the Indian context and assess the factors that affect Indian’s Intercultural Sensitivity in a workplace. In the process the study reproduces a valid scale. Results indicate that Chen and Starosta’s fivefactor model did not fit in the Indian context. The study proposed a three-factor model based on 14 of the 24 items Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) formulated by Chen and Starosta. The Indian Intercultural Sensitivity (IIS) model proposed as an alternative exhibited high internal consistency, reliability, and validity and indicates better fit with Indian culture.

References