Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Factors Affecting Student’s Perception of Online Learning:An Empirical Analysis
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Online learning can be internetbased, electronically through audiovideo lectures, online tutorial, Skype, emails, discussion forum, animation, chat sessions, and CD-Rom. Online learning is at anyplace, anytime education at condensed costs; students obtain course material at whatever time they want. It constructs the course content more motivating and encouraging. Online learning takes place by providing the amenities of chat rooms, e-mail, discussion panel and instant messaging. This study attempts to know the perception of students in Indore about online learning. A structured questionnaire was designed to assemble the data. Factor Analysis technique has been used to take out the factors. The main factors which influence the students’ perception are interaction and participation, popularity, technology, effective teaching and convenience.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2003), Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. ERIC Number: ED530060, 32.
- Arbaugh, J. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2007), “The Importance of Participant Interaction in Online Environments”. Decision Support Systems, 43(3): 853-65
- Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004), “How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature”, Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439
- Benek-Rivera, J. & Mathews, V. E. (2004), “Active Learning with Jeopardy: Students Ask the Questions”, Journal of Management Education, 28: 104–18.
- Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. & Ecclestone, K. (2004), Learning Styles and Pedagogy in post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review, Retrieved June 10, 2012 from www.LSRC.ac.uk: Learning and Skills Research Centre, http://www.lsda.org.uk/file
- Clark. D. (2002), “Psychological Myths in Elearning”, Medical Teacher, 24(6): 598-604.
- Dennis, K., Bunkowski, L. & Eskey, M. (2007), “The Little Engine that Could – How to Start the Motor? Motivating the Online Student”. Insight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 2. Retrieved August 21, 2015, from http://www.insightjournal.net/Volume2.htm
- DeBourgh, G. A. (1999), “Technology is the Tool, Teaching is the Task: Student satisfaction in Distance Learning”, paper presented at the International Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.
- Driscoll, M. & Carliner, S. (2005), Advanced webbased Training Strategies, San Francisco, Pfeiffer.
- Duffy, T. M. & Cunningham, D. J. (1996), “Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction”, in D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, New York: Macmillan.
- Education Times Report (2005), “Learn @ online”, The Times of India, July 25, 2005
- Farraj, H. R., Barak, M. & Dori, Y. (2011), “Initiating a Distance Education Program: Perceptions and Preferences of STEM Graduate Students”. Orlando, FL: Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
- Flottlemesch, K. (2000), “Building Effective Interaction in Distance Education: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3): 46-51
- Heller, D. E. (2015), “The End of College? Not So Fast” The Chronicle of Higher Education, LXI(30), A64.
- Honebein, P. C. (1996), “Seven Goals for the Design of Constructivist Learning Environments”, in B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- Karl, L. S. & James, J. C. (2006), “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study”. Journal of Information Technology Education 5; 201-19
- Lee, C. & Witta, L. (2001), “Online Students’ Perceived Self-Efficacy: Does it change”? paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, GA.
- Levin, T. & Wadmany, R. (2006), “Listening to Students’ Voices on Learning with Information Technologies in a Rich TechnologyBased Classroom”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3): 281-317.
- Lewis, L., Snow, K., Farris, E. & Levin, D. (1999, December 17), Distance Education at Postsecondary Education Institutions: 199798. National Center for Educational Statistics, Retrieved on November 18, 2003 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000013.pdf
- Moore, M. G. (1993), “Theory of Transactional Distance”. in D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. New York: Routledge
- Murphy, K.L. & Collins, M.P. (1997), Communication Conventions in Instructional Electronic Chats. First Monday,2 (11). Retrieved April 5, 2004, from http://www.firstmonday.com.dk/issues/issue2_ 11/index.html
- National Center for Educational Statistics (2003), “Distance Education at Degree-granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000–2001”. Retrieved July 30, 2004, from http:// nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications
- Pathak, C.K. (2003), Distance Education: Prospects and Constraints, Rajat Publications, New Delhi
- Petrides, L.A. (2002), “Web-based Technologies for Distributed (or distance) Learning: Creating Learner-Centered Educational Experiences in the Higher Education Classroom”. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1): 69-77.
- Poole, D.M. (2000), “Student Participation in a Discussion-Oriented Online Course: A Case Study”, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2): 162-77.
- Ramanna, R.K. (2003), Education in Digital Age, Rajat Publications, New Delhi.
- Roberts, T. G., Irani, R. A., Telg, R. W. & Lundy, L. K. (2005), “The Development of an Instrument to Evaluate Distance Education Courses Using Student Attitudes”, The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1): 51-64.
Abstract Views: 170
PDF Views: 0