Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Determinants of Happiness in India: Time Series Ordered Probit Estimation of Subjective Well-being


Affiliations
1 ICSSR Senior Fellow and Formerly Professor, Department of Econometrics, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Attaining the highest level of happiness is the utmost concern of individuals as well as the nations and the whole human society. Individuals feel happiness can be achieved by acquiring income and material perquisites. Though wealth and happiness are positively correlated within a society at a given point of time, in the long run, increasing the income of all in a country may not raise the happiness of all. This lack of a systematic long-run relationship between income and happiness is often due to social comparison, in which individuals evaluate their life satisfaction relative to others’ income. Using the WVS data for eight states of India for the period 1990–2006, this paper examines whether individuals’ happiness or life satisfaction is influenced by their absolute income or by relative income. The estimated ordered probit results show that relative income matters more than individual absolute income for the happiness of individuals. An improvement in the income rank of an individual relative to the reference group will increase the individual happiness level. The results are consistent with the Easterlin paradox that social comparison explains the nill income-happiness relationship in the long run and only relative income/position matters for happiness more than absolute income.

Keywords

Subjective Well-Being, Income Effect, Social Comparison, Reference Income, Absolute vs Relative Income, Income Rank, Ordered Probit Estimation
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Biswas-Diener, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2012). Happiness in India. In H. Selin & G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness Across Cultures: Views of Happiness and Quality of Life in Non-Western Cultures (pp. 125-140). New York: Springer.

  • Borooah, V. K. (2006). What makes people happy? Some evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 427-465.

  • Boyce, C. J. (2010). Understanding fixed effects in human well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 1-16.

  • Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21(4), 471-475.

  • Brown, G. D. A., Gardner, J., Oswald, A., & Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47(3), 355-389.

  • Budria, S. (2013). Are relative-income effects constant across the well-being distribution? Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1379-1408.

  • Budria, S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2019). Life satisfaction, income comparisons and individual traits. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 337-357.

  • Carlsson, F., Gupta, G., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2009). Keeping up with the Vaishyas caste and relative standing in India. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(1), 52-73.

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness and utility: An explanation of Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95-144.

  • Clark, A., Kristensen, N., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (2009). Economic satisfaction and income rank in small neighbourhoods. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2-3), 519-527.

  • Clark, A., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M-E. (2010). Effort and comparison income. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 63(3), 407-426.

  • Clark, A. E., Fleche, S., Layard, R., Powdthavee, N., & Ward, G. (2018). The origins of happiness: The science of well-being over the life course. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Deaton, A. (2008). Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup world poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(2), 53-72.

  • Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25-46.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth (pp.89-125). New York: Academic Press.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35-47.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2017). Paradox lost? Review of Behavioral Economics, 4(4), 311-339.

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2021). An economist’s lessons on happiness: Farewell dismal science. New York: Springer.

  • Easterlin, R. A., & Angelescu, L. (2010). Modern economic growth and quality of life: Cross sectional and time series evidence. In K. C. Land (Ed.), Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality-of-Life Research (pp. 113-136). New York and London: Springer.

  • Easterlin, R. A., & Sawangfa, O. (2010). Happiness and economic growth: Does the cross section predict time trends? In E. Diener, D. Kahneman & J. F. Helliwell (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being (pp. 166-216). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Easterly, W. (1999). Life during growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(3), 239-276.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2001). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110(466), 918-938.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402-435.

  • Glaeser, E. L., Gottlieb, J. D., & Ziv, O. (2016). Unhappy cities. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(S2), S129-S182.

  • Graham, C. (2017). Happiness for all? Unequal hopes and lives in pursuit of the American dream. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Hagerty, M. R. (2000). Social comparisons of income in one’s community: Evidence from national surveys of income and happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 746-771.

  • Hajdu, T., & Hajdu, G. (2014). Income and subjective well-being: How important is the methodology. Hungarian Statistical Review, Special Number 18, 110-127.

  • Inglehart, R. F., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981-2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264-285.

  • Lakshmanasamy, T. (2010). Are you satisfied with your income? The economics of happiness in India. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8(2), 115-141.

  • Lakshmanasamy, T. (2020). Is the effect of income on happiness the same for all in India? A panel quantile regression analysis of the heterogeneity in the relationship between income and life satisfaction. Journal of Organisation and Human Behaviour, 9(1&2), 30-44.

  • Lakshmanasamy, T., & Maya K. (2020). Rank status and happiness in India: A panel ordered probit estimation of the effect of ordinal relative comparison on well-being. Indian Journal of Health and Well-Being, 11(1-3), 48-56.

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.

  • Linssen, R., Kempen, L. V., & Kraaykamp, G. (2011). Subjective well-being in rural India: The curse of conspicuous consumption. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 57-72.

  • Litchfeld, J., Reilly, B., & Veneziani, M. (2012). An analysis of life satisfaction in Albania: An heteroscedastic ordered probit approach. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 81(3), 731-741.

  • Luttmer, E. F. P. (2005). Neighbours as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963-1002.

  • Majumdar, C., & Gupta, G. (2015). Don’t worry, be happy: A survey of the economics of happiness. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(4), 50-62.

  • McGillivray, M. (2007). Human well-Being: Concept and measurement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Nordhaus, W., & Tobin, J. (1973). Is growth obsolete? In M. Moss (Ed.), The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance (pp. 509-564). New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2020). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In S. J. Lopez & L. Edwards (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 187-194). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Paul, S., & Guilbert, D. (2013). Income-happiness paradox in Australia: Testing the theories of adaptation and social comparison. Economic Modelling, 30, 900-910.

  • Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2012). The new stylised facts about income and subjective well-being. Emotion, 12(6), 1181-1187.

  • Sacks, D., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth. In J. S. Lin & C. P. Sepulveda (Eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2011: Development Challenges in a Post-Crisis World. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.

  • Smith, R. H., Diener, E., & Wedell, D. H. (1989). Intrapersonal and social comparison determinants of happiness: A range-frequency analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 317-325.

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39(1), 1-102.

  • Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happy life years: A measure of happiness. In U. Karma & G. Karma (Eds.), Gross National Happiness and Development: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Operationalisation of Gross National Happiness. (pp. 287-318). Center of Bhutan Studies, Thimphu, Bhutan.

  • Yushkina, Y. (2010). The determinants of happiness and its changes: An empirical analysis based on panel data from Russia (Master’s Thesis, Amherst College).


Abstract Views: 199

PDF Views: 0




  • Determinants of Happiness in India: Time Series Ordered Probit Estimation of Subjective Well-being

Abstract Views: 199  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

T. Lakshmanasamy
ICSSR Senior Fellow and Formerly Professor, Department of Econometrics, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Attaining the highest level of happiness is the utmost concern of individuals as well as the nations and the whole human society. Individuals feel happiness can be achieved by acquiring income and material perquisites. Though wealth and happiness are positively correlated within a society at a given point of time, in the long run, increasing the income of all in a country may not raise the happiness of all. This lack of a systematic long-run relationship between income and happiness is often due to social comparison, in which individuals evaluate their life satisfaction relative to others’ income. Using the WVS data for eight states of India for the period 1990–2006, this paper examines whether individuals’ happiness or life satisfaction is influenced by their absolute income or by relative income. The estimated ordered probit results show that relative income matters more than individual absolute income for the happiness of individuals. An improvement in the income rank of an individual relative to the reference group will increase the individual happiness level. The results are consistent with the Easterlin paradox that social comparison explains the nill income-happiness relationship in the long run and only relative income/position matters for happiness more than absolute income.

Keywords


Subjective Well-Being, Income Effect, Social Comparison, Reference Income, Absolute vs Relative Income, Income Rank, Ordered Probit Estimation

References