The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Objectives: To evaluate performance of machine learning methods for assessment of landslide susceptibility at Himalayan area, India. Methods/Statistical analysis: Machine learning methods namely Kernel Logistic Regression (KLR) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART) were applied and compared in this study. Landslide affecting parameters and 930 historical landslides were used for generating datasets. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Statistical analysis methods were used for validation and comparison. Findings: Result analysis shows that both the KLR and CART models perform well for landslide susceptibility assessment but the KLR model (AUC = 0.894) outperforms the CART model (AUC = 0.842). Thus, both these methods can be considered as promising machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility assessment; however, the KLR is better than the CART. Application/Improvements: Results of this study would be useful for susceptibility assessment and landslide hazard management in landslide prone areas.

Keywords

Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Kernel Logistic Regression (KLR), Landslides, Machine Learning
User