The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Background/Objective: To design the AND, OR type circuits based on foot based and foot-less based gate domino logic and compare the results. Methods/Statistics: Nowadays VLSI circuits are expected to operate with low power, high speed, less area and noise tolerance. The major challenge in VLSI circuits is to obtain high performance. There are several digital logic techniques available viz. pseudo static CMOS, pass-transistor logic, complementary pass-transistor logic, GDI, dynamic CMOS logic, domino CMOS logic, which can be used to achieve high performance circuits. Findings: Static CMOS circuits have both pull down and pull up networks, but the disadvantage is, total number of transistors in the circuit is more. The dynamic logic circuits overcome the disadvantage of static complementary MOS. On the other side dynamic logic suffers from charge leakage, charge sharing and noise sensitivity, due to sub-threshold leakage current flow in the Pull Down Network (PDN), called stacking effect. When we scale down the technology, these effects will also get increased.

Keywords

Footed, Foot-Less Domino, Power Dissipation
User