Author Details

This study was designed to offer an online professional development opportunity, "Summer Multicultural and Interdisciplinary Learning for Engineering (SMILE) in Transportation," for future elementary STEM teachers and measure its effects on their teaching. As the student population grows more diverse, schools face more significant challenges in delivering practical instructions on "transportation" to the diverse student population, including minority students who speak English as a second language. SMILE in Transportation provided future science teachers with an opportunity to interact with cultural professionals in Transportation who were experts in Transportation, had their cultural backgrounds, and presented transportation systems through their cultures. The cultural professionals in Transportation involved inter-disciplinarily professionals not only on the college campus but also from the communities. SMILE in Transportation was a novel approach to increase the knowledge of future science teachers in Transportation and to develop a unique teaching methodology that incorporates the backgrounds of culturally and linguistically diverse students into teaching engineering of Transportation. The data collected from the pre-and the post-surveys of the participants' science affinities & cultural competency (teaching efficacy, cultural competency, personal interest, & cultural IQ), science knowledge tests, and the qualitative survey at the end of the project were used to improve future teachers' understanding of Transportation and other cultures and their skills in developing culturally- responsive instructions to teach Transportation, as well as to update SMILE workshop for future sessions.

Keywords

interdisciplinary; minority students; multicultural; Transportation; professional development.

Full Text

References

Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Culturally Relevant Education: A Synthesis of Research Across Content Areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1).

Baurhoo, N & Asghar, A (2014) Using universal design for learning to construct inclusive science classrooms for diverse learners, Learning Landscapes, 7(2), 59-81.

Cloby, S., & Ortman, J. (2015). Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060, U.S. Census Bureau: Department of Commerce, 25-1143.

Chapin, J. R. (2006). The achievement gap in social studies and science starts early: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study, The Social Studies, 97(6), 231–238.

Chowdhury, M. A. (2016). The integration of s c i e n c e - t e c h n o l o g y - s o c i e t y / s c i e n c e - technology-society-environment and socioscientific-issues for effective science education and science teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 19-38.

Dweck, C. (2015). Carol Dweck revisits the growth mindset. Education Week. Retrieved f r o m : https://www.edweek.org/leadership/opinionc a r o l - d w e c k - r e v i s i t s - t h e - g r o w t h - mindset/2015/09

Flanklin, S. L., Slate, J. R., & Sheila, A. (2014). Ethnic Disparities in Graduate Education: A Selective Review of Quantitative Research, Social Theory, and Quality Initiatives, Journal of Faculty Development, 28(3), 63-79.

Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2009). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth‐ and eighth‐grade students in an international context. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf

Hammond, Z. (2014). Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain: Promoting Authentic Engagement and Rigor Among Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students, Corwin Press.

Herman, W. E. (2011). Identity formation. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (eds.), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061- 9_1443

Kozleski, E. B. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching Matters!, Equity Alliance, Retrieved f r o m https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520957.pdf Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix , Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-85.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix, Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74-85.

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2020). Racial/Ethnic Enrollment in Public Schools, The Condition of Education, Retrieved f r o m https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cge .asp

Maypole, J., & Davies, T. G. (2001). Students’ perceptions of constructivist learning in a community college American History II. Community College Review, 29(2), 54-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155210102900205

McLoughlin, C. E., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Developing an online community to promote engagement and professional learning for preservice teachers using social software tools, Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 12(1), 17-30. DOI:10.4018/jcit.2010010102.

Paris, D. (2012). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice, Educational Researcher, 41(3).

Paris, D., & Alim, S. H. (2014). What Are We Seeking to Sustain Through Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy? A Loving Critique Forward, Harvard Educational Review, 84(1).

Rollison, J. M., Ludlow, L. H., & Wallingford, T. W. (2012). Assessing content knowledge and changes in confidence and anxiety related to e c o n o m i c l i t e r a c y i n a P r o f e s s i o n a l development program for history teachers, Journal of Education al Research and Practice, 2(1), 15-30.

Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tan, E., Agrawal, S. E., Arroyo, N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones II, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., Lowe, A., Newman, S., Okolo, V., Olroyd, S., Peecook, S., Pickett, S. B., Slager, D. L., Caviedes-Solis, I. W., Stanchak, K. E., Sundaravardan, V., Valdebenito, C., Williams, C. R., Zinsli, K., & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United S t a t e s o f A m e r i c a ( P N A S ) , 11 7 ( 1 2 ) , https://DOI.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

Qian, X, Nandakumar, R., Glutting, J., Ford, D., & Fifield, S. (2017). Gender and Minority Achievement Gaps in Science in Eighth Grade: Item Analyses of Nationally Representative Data, ETS Research Report,2017(1), 1-19. https://DOI.org/10.1002/ets2.12164

Williams, A. (2011). A call for change: Narrowing the Achievement gap between white and monitory students, the Clearing House, 8 4 ( 2 ) , 6 5 - 7 1 . https://www.jstor.org/stable/41149869

Yager, R. E., & Akcay, H. (2008). Comparison of learning outcomes in middle school science with an STS approach and a typical textbook dominated approach. Research in Middle Level E d u c a t i o n , 3 1 ( 7 ) , 1 - 1 6 . https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2008.114620 50

Yager, R. E., Choi, A, Yager, S. O. & Akcay, H. (2009). Comparing science learning among 4th, 5th, and 6thgrade students: STS versus textbook-based instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173681

Username
Password
Remember me