Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, S. R.
- Traditional vs E-Teaching Learning Due to Covid-19: A Case Study for Mathematics Course
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:104
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, IN
1 Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 35, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 80-87Abstract
As the trend towards E-teaching learning strengthens,questions remain unanswered with the effectiveness of online learning in comparison to traditional classroom learning. The aim of this paper is to analyze the impact of online and offline (conventional method) teaching method on student's learning achievement. This article outlines a case study of E-teaching vs traditional teaching learning of a Mathematics course to first year engineering students within their respective programmes. The results of study are analyzed using bar/pie charts. Comparison between online teaching and traditional teaching has been done for various parameters related to students' interest for online/offline teaching, interaction with students, students' comfort level, instructor's competency etc. related to teaching and learning. The findings generate insights which help to understand the benefits and shortcomings of online/offline teaching consequently helping in improved design of such courses.Keywords
Online Learning, Offline Learning, Covid-19, Learning Tools, Technology.Full Text
References
- Bao, W. (2020). COVID 19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University . Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115.
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
- Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and bl ended Advanced Placement courses . Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004
- Butcher, J. (2020). Public-Private Virtual-School Partnerships and Federal Flexibility for Schools during COVID-19. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.35 64504
- Butcher, N., & Wilson-Strydom, M. (2013). A Guide to Qual ity in Online Learning. https://sirjohnca.files.wordpress.com/2020/04/5 bafb-guide-final.pdf
- Chang, C. L., & Fang, M. (2020). E-Learning and Online Instructions of Higher Education during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Diseases (COVID19) Epidemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1574/1/012166
- Chirikov, I., Semenova, T., Maloshonok, N., Bettinger, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2020). Online education platforms scale college STEM instruction with equivalent learning outcomes at lower cost. Science Advances, 6(15), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay5324
- Deshmukh, R., Irfan, M. M., Shiva, C. K., & Balakrishna, K. (2021). Unlocking the online education space during the lockdown: Adaptation and synergies of teachers and students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 206–210. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157136
- Jabeen, S. S., & Thomas, A. J. (2015). Effectiveness of online language learning. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science.
- Kumari, S. K. P., Anuradha, M. N. L., & P, S. (2017). Correlation Between Class Room and Online Learning In Engineering Education – A Comparitive Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 92–97.
- Lall, S., & Singh, N. (2020). COVID-19: Unmasking the new face of education. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(SPL)(1), 48–53.
- https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11iSPL1.2122
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning. In Structure.
- Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (20 2 0) . Advantages, Limitations and Recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.covid19s4.2785
- Patil, S., Patil, P., Kumbhar, S., Desai, S., Gaikwad, A., Patil, Y., Sawant, S., Kawade, G., & Godbole, S. (2017). Adopting MOOC Based Approach for “Self- Learning” of Students. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 310–315.
- Patrick, S., & Powell, A. (2009). A Summary of Research on the Effectiveness of K-12 Online Learning. In Learning.
- Setyawan, H. (2019). Blended Method: OnlineOffline Teaching And Learning, On Students’ Reading Achievement. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v12i1.4432
- Singh, S., Rylander, D. H., & Mims, T. C. (2012). Efficiency of Online vs. Offline Learning: A Compar ison of Input s and Out comes . International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 2 (1), 93–98. http://ijbhtnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_1_Janua ry_2012/12.pdf
- Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
- Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. M. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
- Team Teaching : A Blended Learning Tool in Engineering Mathematics
Abstract Views :95 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, IN
1 Chitkara University School of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 158-164Abstract
In this article we discussed the effects of team teaching (TT) as a blended learning tool in teaching of course Engineering Mathematics, offered to students, bachelor of Engineering in Chitkara University Himachal Pradesh. A case study discussed here for 8 sections (appx.420 students) taught by teachers. Distribution of topics among team members and how we implemented TT as a blended learning tool is discussed here using tables and diagrams. Analysis of TT presented here by means of its merits and demerits. Statistical analysis of improvements in various parameters have also presented here.Keywords
Team Teaching, Blended Learning, Engineering Mathematics, Learning Process.
References
- Bates A. W. (2011), Sangra Albert. Managing Technology in Higher Education: Strategies for Transforming Teaching and Learning ISBN: 978-1-118-03856-7.
- Lisa R., Halversona Charles R.,Grahamb Kristian J.,Springa Jeffery S.,Drysdalea Curtis R. and Henriea (2013). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research, 20 , 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
- Garrison R., & Kanuka H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
- Chew E. (2009). A blended learning model in higher education: A comparative study of blended learning in UK and Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation). University of Glamorgan.
- Saliba G., Rankine, L. & Cortez, H. (2013). Fundamentals of Blended Learning. University of Western Sydney.
- John Marco Pima, Tanzania Michael Odetayo, Rahat Iqbal and Eliamani Sedoyeka (2018). A Thematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL) 10(1),1-11.
- Eison J. (2010), Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Centre for Teaching Excellence at Cornell University. Retrieved from www.cte.cornell.edu.
- Maxwell C. and White J. (2017). Blended (R) Evolution: How 5 ts are modifying the Station Rotation to fit students' needs. Christensen Institute. 7 and 23.
- Singer F.M. and Stoicescu D. (2011). Using blended learning as a tool to strengthen teaching competences. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1527--1531.
- Levy H.M. (2008). Meeting the Needs of All Students through Differentiated Instruction: Helping Every Child Reach and Exceed Standards. Clearing House, 81(4), 161--164.
- Deslauriers L., Schelew E., and Wieman C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrolment physics class. Science, 332, 862--864.
- Han Z. (2004). Keep improving the art of teaching in Calculus. The China Papers, 4.
- Maurice Taylor, Sait Atas, Shehzad Ghani (2017), Exploring the Experiences of Students and Professors in a Blended Learning Graduate Program: A Case Study of a Faculty of Education International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 9(1), 1-15
- McCombs B. L. and Miller L. (2007). Learner-centered classroom practices and assessments: Maximizing student motivation, learning, and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. (47).
- Andrew L., Ewens B. and Maslin-Prothero, S. (2015). Enhancing the online learning experience using virtual interactive classroom. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 22--31.
- Das Lekha, Sharma, Megha (2020). Case Study: Use of MOODLE to Improve Teaching Learning Process in Control System Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, [S.l.], 43-47. ISSN 2394-1707. doi:10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i3/144640.
- Sawhney Sahil, Sharma Kulwant Kumar, Gupta Ankur (2020). Penetration and Prevalence of Strategic Management in Higher Education Institutions in India. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, [S.l.],7-18. ISSN 2394-1707. doi:10.16920/jeet/2020/v33i3/138205.