Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Hegade, Prakash
- One-Day Many-Problems:A Problem Based Learning Approach
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubballi - 580031, IN
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubballi - 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No SP 1 (2019), Pagination: 119-124Abstract
Problem Based Learning not only improves problem-solving abilities but also promotes the development of critical thinking skills, involvement in the team, communication skills, comprehending the reflections, and all of the mentioned along with understanding and applying the course content. A considerable number of universities have experimented with variants of problembased learning on a variety of course content delivery. The methodology has its challenges of crafting a good ill-structured problem, delivery techniques, evaluation parameters, scaffolding, etc. The problem-based learning sessions usually require lengthier time due to inherent nature, while most universities have class hour sessions of one to two hours. Also, the problem-based sessions are generally effective in smaller classrooms of strength up to thirty. This paper presents the One-Day Many-Problems approach, a teaching-learning model, which helps to craft questions, facilitate discussions, trigger motivation, provide reflections, and comprehend using scaffolding activities. The sessions are planned to engage the classes in intervals where a chain of sessions sum up to inclusive conclusions - the approach aids in the attainment of expected course learning outcomes with systematic and meticulous planning and execution. The paper further presents a case study of the model applied to an eight-semester course – Model Thinking. The paper discusses the results and ponders over the achievement of course learning outcomes along with general guidelines and learnings. One-Day Many-Problems approach proves to be a beneficial delivery model for a shorter session and larger strength classrooms.Keywords
Course Learning Outcomes, Model, One-Day Many-Problems, Problem Based Learning.References
- Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods. Medical education, 20(6), 481-486.
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266.
- Savery, J. R. & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational technology, 35(5), 31-38.
- Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.
- Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: definition and distinctions, the interdisciplinary. In Journal of Problem-based learning.
- Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P. and Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A metaanalysis. Learning and instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
- Norman, G. T. and Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic medicine, 67(9), 557-565.
- Mills, J. E. and Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian journal of engineering education, 3(2), 2-16.
- De Graaf, E. and Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.
- Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: research and theory. Academic medicine, 75(3), 259-266.
- Berkson, L. (1993). Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met?. Academic medicine.
- Stepien, W. and Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational leadership, 50, 25-25.
- O'Grady, G., Yew, E., Goh, K. P. and Schmidt, H. (Eds.). (2012). One-day, one-problem: An approach to problembased learning. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Achilles, C. M. and Hoover, S. P. (1996). Exploring Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Grades 6-12.
- San Tan, S.and Ng, C. F. (2006). A problem-based learning approach to entrepreneurship education. Education+ Training, 48(6), 416-428.
- Bridges, E. M. (1992). Problem Based Learning for Administrators. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon, 1787 Agate Street, Eugene, OR 97403-5207.
- Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I. and Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem‐based learning: what works and why. Medical education, 45(8), 792-806.
- Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning. BMJ. 326 (7384): 328– 330.
- Barrett, Terry (2010). The problem‐based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 47 (2): 165–174.
- Wells, Samantha H, Warelow, Philip J, Jackson and Karen L (2009). Problem based learning (PBL): A conundrum. Contemporary Nurse. 33 (2): 191–201.
- Design for Requirements Engineering
Abstract Views :179 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, IN
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No 0 (2020), Pagination: 219-224Abstract
Requirements engineering is a fundamental and critical part of the software development process as every further step is influenced by it. Requirements engineering refers to the process of defining, documenting, and maintaining the project requirements. Interviews, brainstorming, task analysis, Delphi technique, prototyping, etc. are some of the methods for requirements collections where the stakeholders can be customers, business manuals, standards, existing similar projects, experts, etc. The modern digitized society and rapidly growing start-up culture present several gaps in the current process that needs immediate addressing. This paper breaks down the requirement process, its challenges, into various facets and discusses the methods to cover the existing gaps. Inducing a design aspect with wireframes into requirements that play a vital role, requirements are further drawn from infrastructure, competitor landscape, and culture. We call this 'Design the Requirements' approach. The paper systematically compares and classifies the traditional and our approach for a part of the restaurant application case study. The results show that contemporary projects are complex than what we consider to be and need a broader horizon of rational thought processes. The approach works towards the evolving and multifaceted modern society.Keywords
Design, Requirements, Wireframes.- Principles of Elective Design with Industry-Institute Collaboration
Abstract Views :235 |
PDF Views:131
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, IN
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 34, No SP ICTIEE (2021), Pagination: 384-390Abstract
Along with core courses, an education program is usually designed with discretionary elective courses for professional advancement. It is naturally inherent that most electives' course contents need periodic apprise to persevere to the state-of-art. The pace at which industries adapt to new technologies is considerably rapid as compared to the teaching and learning that happens at the university. However, an elective design needs an equal role and support to be played by the industry and the institute. This paper proposes the design principles for an elective course, which envelopes from curriculum structure to evaluation methodologies. The principles are outlined to cover the design aspects, selection methodologies for the content and course materials, syllabus division to units, course learning outcomes, teaching pedagogy, industry principles, evaluation methodologies, and course learning attainment. Each principle is presented with an objective and deliberation. The intended principles were applied to the design and delivery of an elective – Semantic Web. The course, which was offered with an industry-institute collaboration, was opted by 125 students in the sixth semester. The paper further presents each of the principles as applied and delivered for the semantic web course. The course attainment with respect to course learning outcomes, student elective opt ratio, and the feedback obtained stand in favor of the proposed model. The principles can be applied to design the elective for enhanced learning experiences and make students industry-ready, which is one of the major objectives for introducing the electives.Keywords
Design, Elective, Industry, Learning Outcomes, Principles.- Building a Course Portfolio with Industry-Institute Collaboration
Abstract Views :68 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, IN
1 KLE Technological University, Hubli-31, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No SP (2022), Pagination: 50-55Abstract
The effective integration strategies of blended learning with traditional, designed a decade ago and proven effective, scalable, and flexible, now put forth several other challenges with delivery and evaluation. Especially for the elective courses, they demand assessments that add value to the course and the student's resume. The principles of elective design, the delivery tools, and techniques, the number of students, the significance of the course, etc., are some of the major evaluation parameters to be considered for the design of assessment strategies. This paper presents one such evaluation methodology, portfolio design, for the courses delivered in a blended learning model, which can also be adapted to the offline learning model. The model involved problem analysis, concept relation, design thinking, solution approaches, implementation, and presentation in the form of a portfolio. The portfolios were created online using various open source tools. The paper presents the model and design goals in detail. The first offering of the course had course projects, and the second offering had portfolio creation. The grades and attainment have improved in the second offering compared to the first one. There is also improvement in the course attainment where course learning objectives have remained the same. Portfolios are an effective strategy to evaluate one's course understanding. Portfolios can be an effective way to present the course realizations to the community as justified through the t-test analysis.Keywords
Assessment, Blended-Learning, Elective Design, Portfolio.References
- Arnove, R. F. (1980). Comparative education and world-systems analysis. Comparative education review, 24(1), 48-62.
- Bhattacharya, M., & Hartnett, M. (2007). E-portfolio assessment in higher education. In 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports (pp. T1G-19). IEEE.
- Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
- Brandt, M. W. (2010). Portfolio choice problems. In Handbook of financial econometrics: Tools and techniques (pp. 269-336). North-Holland.
- Campbell, D. M., Melenyzer, B. J., Nettles, D. H., & Wyman Jr, R. M. (1999). Portfolio and performance assessment in teacher education.
- Christy, A. D., & Lima, M. (1998). The use of student portfolios in engineering instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 143-148.
- Elliott, N. (2003). Portfolio creation, action research and the learning environment: A study from probation. Qualitative Social Work, 2(3), 327-345.
- Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M., Miller, C., Scholes, J., & Webb, C. (2004). Using portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence: the impact of four models. Nurse education in practice, 4(4), 250-257.
- Gronlund, G. (1998). Portfolios as an assessment tool: Is collection of work enough?. Implementation Program: Teacher Guide, 266.
- Guri-Rosenblit, S., Šebková, H., & Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and diversity of higher education systems: Interplay of complex dimensions. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 373-389.
- Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended learning environment. In European and Mediterranean conference on information systems (Vol. 60, p. 14).
- Harris, S., Dolan, G., & Fairbairn, G. (2001). Reflecting on the use of student portfolios. Nurse education today, 21(4), 278-286.
- Hegade, P., Patil, N., & Bidari, I. (2021). Principles of Elective Design with Industry-Institute Collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34, 384-390.
- Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2008). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE transactions on education, 52(1), 19-30.
- Imhof, M., & Picard, C. (2009). Views on using portfolio in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 149-154.
- Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 93, 612-617.
- Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 68(6), 540-546.
- Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of educational research, 76(4), 567-605.
- Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the ARCS model. Journal of computer assisted learning, 37(5), 1397-1408.
- McMullan, M., Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M., Miller, C. M., Scholes, J., & Webb, C. (2003). Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing, 41(3), 283-294.
- Mokhtaria, L. (2015). The use of portfolio as an assessment tool. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(07), 170-72.
- Paulson, F. L. (1991). What Makes a Portfolio a Portfolio?. Educational leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
- Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (Eds.). (2021). Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, Volume 3.
- Precel, K., Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Alberton, Y. (2009). Pedagogical and design aspects of a blended learning course. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2).
- Procter, C. T. (2003). Blended learning in practice, 1-6.
- Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701.
- Singh, H. (2021). Building effective blended learning programs. In Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks. USA: IGI Global, 15-23.
- Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314.
- Syzdykova, Z., Koblandin, K., Mikhaylova, N., & Akinina, O. (2021). Assessment of E-portfolio in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(2), 120-134.
- Tillema, H. H. (2001). Portfolios as developmental assessment tools. International journal of training and development, 5(2), 126-135.
- Udo-Imeh, P. T., Edet, W. E., & Anani, R. B. (2012). Portfolio analysis models: A review. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(18), 101-120.