Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Waychal, Pradeep
- Innovating Final Year (Capstone) Projects in Engineering Education
Abstract Views :176 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, IN
1 SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No Spl Iss (2016), Pagination:Abstract
The final year (capstone) projects are the largest - and in many cases the only - projects that engineering students execute. The projects require sufficient attention both at the selection and execution phases. We designed and delivered a workshop to the final (senior) year students, at the start of the year. It helped them to choose projects aligned with their passions and that can solve real life problems. Twenty nine out of thirty seven students - who attended the workshop - opined that they changed the direction or the project. We require iterating the experiment with more number of students for validationof the concept and refining the workshop to accrue benefits to more students.- Running a Successful Textile Diploma Course in a Remote Indian Town-A Case Study
Abstract Views :200 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 SVKM's, NMIMS, Shirpur, IN
1 SVKM's, NMIMS, Shirpur, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 38-42Abstract
Indian Textile industry is unique in many ways. It is the second largest employer and depends heavily on the largest employer - agriculture. It has been successful in automating most of its operations. So, instead of employing unskilled labor, it is now looking for skilled labor and facing significant challenges in finding them - even though the national unemployment has been hovering at around 9 %. The situation demanded a different approach such as setting up textile training courses in a remote area where employment is a larger issue and working closely with the industry to develop highly employable graduates. The paper describes a successful case study ofsetting up a four year diploma course in close collaboration with the industry in a remote town of Shirpur in North Maharashtra (India). That required a team of faculty that could inspire confidence in the industry personnel and adopting progressive educational methods such as active learning and mentoring. The school was started in 2007 and has produced 200 diploma holders with cent percent placement. This is far above similar other institutes. These students from rural and semi-rural area are fetching salaries that are higher than even graduate engineers. Thus the experiment has succeeded in its twin objectives of rural development and workforce development for one of the most critical industry of the country.- Innovating Final Year (Capstone) Projects in Engineering Education
Abstract Views :201 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, IN
1 SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 30, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 26-29Abstract
The final year (capstone) projects are the largest-and in many cases the only-projects that engineering students execute. The projects require sufficient attention both at the selection and execution phases. We designed and delivered a workshop to the final (senior) year students, at the start of the year. It helped them to choose projects aligned with their passions and that can solve real life problems. Twenty nine out of thirty seven students-who attended the workshop-opined that they changed the direction or the project. We require iterating the experiment with more number of students for validation of the concept and refining the workshop to accrue benefits to more students.References
- (AICTE), (2013 Accessed on 26 Jan 2015). Growth of Technical Institutions. from http://www.aicteindia. org/downloads/Growth_Technical_Institutio ns_310514.pdf#toolbar=0
- ABET. (2014). CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS. Baltimoe USA.
- Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415
- Covey, S. (1989). The seven habits of highly successful people. Fireside/Simon & Schuster.
- Dyer, W. (1995). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. doi: 10.1002/j.21689830.2005.tb00832.x
- Engineering", N. A. o. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century, : National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004.
- Goel, S. (2006). Competency focused engineering education with reference to IT related disciplines: is the Indian system ready for transformation? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 27-52.
- Grimson, J. (2002). Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 31-37. doi: 10.1080/03043790110100803
- Koehn, E. (1999). ABET program criteria for educating engineering students. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE'99, Paper 413,.
- Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education.Digital Commons@University of Nebraska Lincoln.
- Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2-16.
- NBA. (2012). Manual for Accreditation of Undergraduate Engineering Programs. New Delhi India: National Board of Accrediation.
- Ogot, M., & Okudan., G. E. Integrating Systemic Creativity into First Year Engineering Design Curriculum.International Journal of Engineering Education 22.1 (2006): 109.
- Olson, S. (2013). Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning:: Summary of a Forum: National Academies Press.
- Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and practice.Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345-358. doi: 10.1080/713699144
- Prem Krishna, e. a. (2014). INAE 2037-VISION, MISSION, AND VALUES. New Delhi, India: INAE.
- Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. doi: 10.1002/j.21689830.2006.tb00884.x
- Sibley, J. a., & Spiridoff, S. (2010). What is TBL? http://www.teambasedlearning.org/: The University of British Columbia, Retrieved Feb 23, 2015.
- Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., & Anthony, D. K. (1995). A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165-174.
- Vaitheeswaran, V. (Oct 11th 2007). Something new under the sun. The Economist.
- Vest, C. (2008). Context and challenge for twenty-first century engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 235-236.
- Waychal, P. (2015). The Index of Learning Style to Measure and the Student-Centered Learning Strategies to Develop Creativity Competency. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 97112.
- Waychal, P., Mohanty, R., & Verma, A. (2011). Determinants of innovation as a competence: an empirical study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(2), 192-211.
- Team and Project Based Learning for a Sophomore Course on Digital System Design
Abstract Views :216 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 SVKM'S NMIMS, Shirpur, IN
1 SVKM'S NMIMS, Shirpur, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 30, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 109-118Abstract
The paper describes our experience of using team-and project-based learning (TBL PBL) instructional strategy, which, despite strong evidence of efficacy, is underused - especially - in the early years of engineering education. We describe our framework FAME (form, allocate, monitor and evaluate) for operationalizing the strategy and illustrate it's usage for a sophomore course in digital system design. We found that the strategy resulted in students understanding basic concepts well and utilizing them in developing real life applications as well as developing teamwork, self-learning, and time management skills. We believe that the framework and our experience can be helpful to other faculty members to implement the TBL PBL strategy in their courses.Keywords
Project Based Learning, Team Based Learning, Digital System Design.References
- Bourne, J., D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 131-146.
- Koehn, E., ABET program criteria for educating engineering students. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE'99, Paper 413,..(1999), Available on-line at http://www.fs.vsb.cz/akce/1999/ICEE99/Pro ceedings/papers/413/413.htm.
- Grimson, J., Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. 27(1): p. 31-37.
- Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000. 25(1): p. 54-67.
- Ohland,M.W. andR.A. Layton. Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. in 2000 Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. 2000.
- Nigel Spinks, N.S.a.D.B., Educating Engineers for the 21st Century: The Industry View. 2006, The Royal Academy of Engineering.
- Bell, S., Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2010. 83(2): p. 39-43.
- National Science Foundation, Systemic Engineering Education Reform: An Action Agenda. 1997, National Science Foundation, : www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9827, .
- Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A. and Tannenbaum, S.I. , ed.Toward an understanding of team performance and training Teams: Their Training and Performance,. ed. R.W.a.S. Swezey, E. 1992, Ablex Publ ishing Corporation, :Westport,CT,. pp. 3-29.
- Sibley, J.S., S. Retrieved February 23, 2011,,What isTBL? (2010). The University of British Columbia - Faculty of Applied Science : http://www.teambasedlearning.org/.
- Michaelsen, L.K., Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education. Digital Commons@University ofNebraska -Lincoln, 1992.
- Prince, M.J. and R.M. Felder, Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(2): p. 123-138.
- Mills, J.E. and D.F. Treagust, Engineering education—Is problem-based or project based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 3: p. 2-16.
- Acar, B.S., and I.A. Newman, Students as Tutors—Learning Problem-Solving Skills hy Tutoring PBL. Intemational Journal of Engineering Education, , 2003. 19 (5): p. 712-716.
- Perrenet, J.C., P.A.J. Bouhuijs, and J.G.M.M. Smits, The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 2000. 5(3): p. 345358.
- Entwistle, N., V.McCune, and J. Hounsell, Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Enhancing Teaching and Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Occasional Report, 2002. 1.
- Perry Jr, W.G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. 1999: ERIC.
- Lehmann, M., et al., Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. European Journal of Engineer ing Education, 2008. 33(3): p. 283-295.
- Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 103-120.
- Barrows, H.S., How to Design a Problem Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. 1985, NewYork,N.Y.:: Springer Verlag.
- Dyer, W., Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. . 1995, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Nelson,W.A., Problem solving through design. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003. 2003(95): p. 39-44.
- Star Legacy Modules. Iris Center for Faculty Enhancement,Vanderbilt University.
- Mariela A. Rodríguez, J.G.a.P.G.S., Preparing School Leaders to Effectively Support Special Education Programs: Using Modules in Educational Leadership in the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration. 2006: San Antonio,Texas
- Hernandez, S.A., Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 2002. 24(1): p. 73-85.
- Connerley, M.L. and F.A. Mael, The Importance and Invasiveness of Student Team Selection Criteria. Journal of Management Education, 2001. 25(5): p. 471-494.
- Song, H.-D. and B.L. Grabowski, Stimulating intrinsic motivation for problem solving using goal-oriented contexts and peer group composition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2006. 54(5): p. 445-466.
- Deibel, K., Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work, in Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 2005, ACM:Caparica, Portugal. p. 291-295.
- Bandow, D., Time to create sound teamwork. Journal for Quality and Participation, 2001. 24(2).
- Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How people learn. 2000,Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- McKendall, M., Teaching Groups to Become Teams. Journal of Education for Business, 2000. 75(5): p. 277-282.
- Brooks, C.M. and J. L. Ammons, Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 2003. 78(5): p. 268-272.
- Brown, R. Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. in Frontiers in Education Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 1995. 1995. IEEE.
- Szymanski, M.H. and J. Whalen,Making work visible: ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice. 2011: Cambridge University Press.
- Garfinkel;, H., Studies in Ethnomethodology. . 1967, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: PrenticeHall,.
- James, P.S., Interoccupational teamwork in a home health setting:An ethnography, in Faculty of Social Sciences. 1990, University of Denver.
- cihub.Available from: https://cihub.org/.
- Glaser, B., Strauss, A., The Discovery of Grounded Theory. . 1967, Hawthorne, NY.: Aldine PublishingCompany,.
- Innovating Development of the NBAGraduate Attributes
Abstract Views :204 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Guruji Education Foundation, Thane (W) Maharashtra-400610, IN
1 Guruji Education Foundation, Thane (W) Maharashtra-400610, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 30, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 172-178Abstract
The main issue the Indian engineering education system has been facing is poor employability. Earlier solutions to tackle the issue were unclear and now the NBA (National Board of Accreditation) has provided solution by identifying a list of graduate attributes.The attribute list has defined what is to be done and has left the task of how it is to be done to the engineering institutes.The colleges are not able to manage the 'how' part due to the heavy curricular load and the paucity of qualified faculty.We present a solution of conducting a one-day workshop on 'innovating success' that can help develop the attributes and identify appropriate final year projects, which can further accentuate the development. We conducted the workshop at a leading college in the state of Maharashtra that was successful in providing opportunities to develop the attributes as per the participants' rating. The workshop also provided a superior learning experience as per the overall workshop rating given by the participants. It was 4.5 out of 5. We need to extend the workshop to two days, or carry out iteration, or design a semester long course to strengthen the development. Given the size of the Indian engineering education system, we would require effective scaling solutions.Keywords
Graduate Attributes, Innovation, Creativity, Employability, Active Learning.References
- AICTE. All Indian Council of Technical Education - Dashboard. 2016 [cited 2016 13Sep-2016]; Available from: http://www.aicteindia.org/dashboard/pages/dashboardaicte.php.
- Blom, A. and H. Saeki, Employability and skill set of newly graduated engineers in India. 2011.
- Aspiring_Minds, National employability report of engineers 2016, Aspiring Minds.
- Kotturshettar, B. and A. Shettar. Mapping Graduate Attributes of NBA with the Program Outcomes of the ABET/OBE to Establish Consistency between the Two. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education. 2015. Springer.
- Rawson, G.e.a. How to scale personalized learning. 2016;Available from: http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/socialsector/ our-insights/how-to-scale-personalizedlearning?cid=other-eml-alt-mip-mck-oth-1608.
- Waychal, P. A Framework for Developing Innovation Competencies. in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016. New Orleans,US.
- Ashcraft, C. and A. Breitzman,Who invents IT? An analysis of women's participation in information technology patenting. National Center for Women & IT, 2007.
- London_Business_School, Men and Women in Teams. Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business, London Business School, 2007.
- Kurtzberg, T.R. and T.M. Amabile, From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 2001. 13(3-4): p. 285-294.
- Hargadon, A., How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. 2003:Harvard Business Press.
- Hansen,M.T. and J. Birkinshaw, The innovation value chain. Harvard business review, 2007. 85(6): p. 121.
- Bessant, J., K. Möslein, and V. Von Stamm, In search of innovation. The Wall Street Journal, 2009. 22.
- Covey, S., The seven habits of highly successful people. Fireside/Simon & Schuster, 1989.
- Sipos, Y., B. Battisti, and K. Grimm, Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 2008. 9(1): p. 68-86.
- Nichols, S.P. and N.E. Armstrong, Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering education? Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE, 2003. 45(1): p. 134-138.
- Easton, F., Educating the whole child,"head, heart, and hands": Learning from the Waldorf experience. Theory into Practice, 1997. 36(2): p. 87-94.
- Stauffer, M. and D.-E. Pehrsson, Mindfulness competencies for counselors and psychotherapists. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 2012. 34(3): p. 227-239.
- Appelbaum, R., et al., China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the 21st Century. 2009.
- Munshi, P., Making breakthrough innovation happen: how eleven Indians pulled off the impossible. 2009: Collins Business.
- Patton, E. and S.H. Appelbaum, The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 2003. 26(5): p. 60-71.
- Steiner, G. and A. Posch, Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006. 14(9): p. 877-890.
- Taiichi, O. Ask 'why' five times about every matter. 2006 14-09-2016]; Available from: http://www.toyota-global.com/company/toyota_traditions/quality/ mar_apr_2006.html.
- Christensen, C.M. and M.E. Raynor, The Innovator's DNA. Harvard Business School Press,Massachusetts. Solution, 2003.
- Waychal, P., et al., Towards a framework for innovations. International Journal of Business Excellence, 2011. 4(5): p. 493-518.
- Sirkin,H.L., P.Keenan, and A. Jackson,The hard side of change management. Harvard business review, 2005. 83(10): p. 108.
- Ashkenas, R., Change management needs to change. Harvard business review, blog, https://hbr. org, 2013. 4.
- Perry, W., et al., Grand challenges for engineering. National Academy of Engineering, Washington,DC, 2008.
- . Strauss, A. and J. Corbin, Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 1994: p. 273-285.
- Creswell, J.W. and D.L. Miller, Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 2000. 39(3): p. 124-130.
- Golafshani, N., Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 2003. 8(4): p. 597-606.
- Rossman, G.B. and S.F. Rallis, Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. 2011:Sage.