Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Moharir, Mrunal
- Effective Application of One Minute Paper and Muddiest Point Technique to Enhance Students' Active Engagement: A Case Study
Abstract Views :83 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Mechanical Engineering Dept.,, IN
2 Basic Sciences and Humanities Dept. Cummins College of Engineering for Women, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India., IN
1 Mechanical Engineering Dept.,, IN
2 Basic Sciences and Humanities Dept. Cummins College of Engineering for Women, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India., IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No 3 (2023), Pagination: 01-10Abstract
Outcome based education involves a student centric approach. Active participation of students in the classroom plays a significant role in the Outcome Based Education model. This paper explains the use of two active learning techniques viz. 1) Muddiest Point Technique 2) One Minute Paper for three courses taught to third year Mechanical Engineering undergraduate program. The Muddiest Point Technique was used for the course Computer Oriented Numerical Methods (CONM) by using Padlet as a tool to record the conceptual difficulties. One Minute Paper (OMP) was applied to the two courses, Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanisms (ASM) using traditional One Minute Paper and to another course namely Automation and Control Engineering (ACE) using goggle form. Students' responses to the survey questionnaire showed that implementation of these techniques improved overall understanding of the course content. It gives students a chance to communicate their conceptual difficulties without any hesitation.Keywords
Active learning, Classroom Assessment Techniques (CAT), Covid-19 Pandemic, Hybrid mode, Muddiest Point Technique, One Minute Paper(OMP).
References
- Jenny Lloyd-Strovas, Ph.D (2015) Tips for Teaching Large Classes Teaching, Learning, and Professional Development Center Texas Tech University: August, 2015
- Richard M. Felder, Rebecca Brent. 'Teaching and learning stem, a practical guide'.
- Qiaohui Wu (2010), 'Discussion about active learning of Undergraduates', 2010 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer
- Gleason et al., 'An Active-Learning Strategies Primer forAchieving Ability-Based Educational Outcomes', American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 2011 Nov 10; 75(9) Article 186
- N. Sasikumar (2014), 'Impact of active learning strategies to enhance student performance ', Innovative Journal of Education, Vol 2, Issue 1
- David R. Stead, University of York, UK (2005) 'A review of the one-minute paper' Active Learning in Higher Education, The Higher Education Academy and SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) Vol 6(2): 118–131
- Ashakiran S., Deepthi R. (2013), One Minute paper: A thinking centered assessment tool, Internet Journal of Medical Update July 8(2):3-9
- Paula S.karlsson, Alison Gibb, Paul Ferri (2018), A staff/student partnership for bringing the one minute Paper into the digital age, Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, Vol4, No.1, 2018
- Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Manish Tayawade (2021) 'One minute paper: The reflective way to teach and learn in medical education', Indian journal of Forensic and community medicine
- Majumdar Rwitajit, Iyer Shridhar (2013) LA MP: A framewo rk for Larg e-scale Addressing of Muddy Points, IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education
- Carberry Adam, Krause Stephen and Ankeny Casey, (2013) “Unmuddying” Course Content Using Muddiest Point Reflections
- Daniel Perez, Leila Zahedi, Monique Ross, Jia Zhu, Tiffany Vinci-Cannava, Laird Kramer, Maria Charters, (2020) WIP: An exploration into the muddiest points and self-efficacy of students in introductory computer science courses, IEEE Xplore
- J. Shaaruddin, M. Mo hamad (2017 ), 'Identifying the Effectiveness of Active Learning Strategies and Benefits in Curriculum and Pedagogy Course for Undergraduate TESL Students', Creative Education 08(14):2312-2324
- H. A. Seneviratne and M. Thenabadu (2021), 'Evaluation of Student Perceptions on “Muddiest Point” Classroom Assessment Technique Implemented As A Formative Assessment Method', International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies (IJHAS), Vol. 6, No.1, February 2021
- Sandip R. Desai (2022), Impact of Active Learning Methods on Students' Learning and Course Results, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume 35, No.3, January 2022
- Afzal Sayed Munna (2021), Md Abul Kalam, Impact of Active Learning Strategy on the Student Engagement GNOSI : A n Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis Volume 4, Issue 2, June, 2021 ISSN (Online): 2714-2485
- Effective Implementation of Peer Review as an Active Learning Technique to Attain Course Outcome : A Case Study
Abstract Views :58 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering for Women, Pune, IN
1 MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering for Women, Pune, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No SP (2022), Pagination: 63-72Abstract
To engage the students actively in large classes is a challenging task. It became tougher especially in the online mode of conduction of lectures, due to the pandemic situation. In the absence of physical classroom interaction, students tend to lose focus and disconnect with the course content. It is observed that implementation of active learning techniques, helps in enhancing students’ engagement. It also appears to be beneficial in improving attainment levels of the course outcomes which is a very important aspect of the outcome based education. This paper discusses Peer Review as an active learning strategy, implemented for the course of Basic Electrical and Electronics Engineering for the first year engineering students. The students were divided into small groups, were asked to solve problems (were given a task based on a course outcome) and were asked to Peer Review the work with the help of assessment rubric provided. Course outcome where Peer Review Technique was implemented is compared with the other course outcomes where this technique was not implemented.Keywords
Active Learning, Peer Review, Course Attainment, Program Outcome, Outcome Based Education.References
- Sandip R. Desai, Impact of Active Learning Methods on Students’ Learning and Course Results, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume 35, No.3, January 2022
- Keith J. Topping , Peer Assessment : Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners, Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, October 2017
- I Van den Berg, Wilfried Admiraal, Albert Pilot, ”Design Principles and Outcomes of peer assessment in higher education”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 31, No. 3, June 2006, pp. 341–356
- Sue Odom, Betty Glenn, Susan Sanner, and Kathleen A.S. Cannella, Group Peer Review as an Active Learning Strategy in a Research Course, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2009, Volume 21, Number 1, 108-117
- Guangwei Hu Sandra Tsui Eu Lam, ‘Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: exploring Peer Reviewin a second language writing class’, 8 January 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Instr Sci (2010) 38:371–394
- Joanna Smith, Joe Tessler, Elliot Kramer, Calvin Lin, Using Peer Review to Teach Software Testing, ICER '12: Proceedings of the ninth annual international conference on International computing education research September 2012 Pages 93–98
- Harald Søndergaarda, and Raoul A. Mulderb, Collaborative learning through formative peer review: pedagogy, programmes and potential, Computer Science Education Vol. 22, No. 4, December 2012, 343–367, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
- Raoul A Mulder, Jon M Pearce, Chi Baik, Peer Review In higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation, Active Learning in Higher Education, 2014
- Martin Stigmar, Peer-to-peer Teaching in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review, Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 2016, Vol. 24, No. 2, 124–136,Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
- Brill, J. M. (2016). Investigating Peer Review as a systemic pedagogy for developing the design knowledge, skills, and dispositions of novice instructional design students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 681–705. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9421-6
- Nancy Reese-Durham, Peer Evaluation as an Active Learning Technique, Journal of Instructional Psychology, Vol.32, No 4, January 2005
- A. D. Patange, A. K. Bewoor, S. P. Deshmukh, S. S. Mulik, S. S. Pardeshi, R. Jegadeeshwaran (2019), Improving Outcome Attainments Using Project Based Learning approach for: UG Course – Mechatronics, Journal of Engineering Education Program Transformations, 33(1), 1-8.
- David R. Krathwohl, A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview, THEORY INTO PRACTICE, Volume 41, Number 4, 2002
- A. K. Bewoor and V. A Kulkarni (2018), “Use of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) as an Active Learning Strategy to Teach Quality Control”, Conference on National Symposium on Innovations in Teaching-Learning Process, DYPCoE, Pune.
- Anand Bewoor (2020), Use of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) as an Active Learning Strategy to Teach Metrology Course, Cummins College Digest of Engineering Education, 1(1).
- www.nbaind.org