Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bhadri, G. N.
- Design and Development of Concept Assessment Tool (CAT):A Concept Inventory
Abstract Views :248 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, K.L.E. Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubli - 580031, IN
2 Department of Mathematics, K.L.E. Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubli - 580031, IN
3 Department of Engineering Education and System Design, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287, US
1 School of Computer Science and Engineering, K.L.E. Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubli - 580031, IN
2 Department of Mathematics, K.L.E. Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubli - 580031, IN
3 Department of Engineering Education and System Design, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287, US
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 16-21Abstract
The stereotyped instruction system is the traditional method of imparting instructions. This method imparts the information without knowing the existing level of understating of the learner. This leads to a series of misconceptions. A concept inventory identifies the misconceptions with respect to important concepts. This paper aims at assessing the students' prior knowledge and identifying misconceptions. It uses concept inventory as a tool to overcome misconceptions. The change in conceptual development is measured.Keywords
Concept, Concept Inventory, Misconception, Pedagogy.
References
- Evans, D. L., & Hestenes, D. (2001). The concept of the concept inventory assessment instrument. In frontiers in education conference, 2001. 31st annual (Vol. 2, pp. F2A-F21). IEEE.
- Chen, J. C., Kadlowec, J., & Whittinghill, D. (2004). Work in progress: Combining concept inventories with rapid feedback to enhance learning.
- Streveler, R. A., Brown, S., Herman, G. L., & Montfort, D. (2014). Conceptual change and misconceptions in engineering education: Curriculum, measurement, and theory-focused approaches. Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (CHEER), 83-102.
- Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004, June). The ABC's of engineering education: ABET, Bloom's taxonomy, cooperative learning, and so on. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition (Vol. 1)
- Wittie, L., Kurdia, A., &Huggard, M. (2017, October). Developing a concept inventory for Journal of Engineering Education Transformations , Volume 33 , No.1, July 2019, ISSN 2349-2473, eISSN 2394-1707 21 computer science 2. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-4). IEEE
- Streveler, R. A., Brown, S., Herman, G. L., & Montfort, D. (2014). Conceptual change and misconceptions in engineering education: Curriculum, measurement, and theory-focused approaches. Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (CHEER), 83-102.
- Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84(3), 261.
- Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of educational research, 63(1), 1-49.
- Kessler, F. (1995). Team decision making: pitfalls and procedures. Management Development Review, 8(5), 38-40