A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mishra, B. K.
- Innovation in Online Evaluation for Authentic Assessment
Authors
1 Dean SSW & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, IN
3 Principal & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 35, No SP (2021), Pagination: 27-34Abstract
In the present pandemic condition, challenge as a teacher, is not only to learn new tools for online teaching but also conducting online assessment and to assure that the assessment curves are not flat but shall be a natural response which has bell shaped distribution. We all know the impact of flat evaluation is that the industry will lose trust on the quality of graduate and their knowledge based on marks/grades. This will put the quality of technical education under doubt when high scorers perform poorly in the recruitment process (including job interviews) where students are not even able to pass the basic aptitude clearance test.
Online education may not lack the quality and integrity of face- to-face instruction, but it is easy to cheat in online assessment. So, there is a need to develop some innovative and best practices which will help the sincere students to have academic edge over the insincere students and the students' marks or grades shall be the replica of their intellectual ability. It will enable the deserving students to get their due credits and not bring all at the same level. Current problem of flat evaluation which has become more significant in the current pandemic can be overcome. This is mainly because of online examinations in the home environment. This paper suggests and tests some techniques to remove flatness in evaluation and make it more authentic such as, use of uniqueness and uncertainty in question paper and assessment, conducting multiple activities as part of evaluation, giving weightage to various activities as per the efforts, making assessment a multilevel activity etc. The results show the evaluation curves which were flat when no innovative assessment technique was used for assessment became bell shaped when innovative assessment technique was used. Moreover, it was found to be in alignment with testing based on classroom testing under a proctored environment.
Keywords
Innovation, Evaluation, Assessment, Normal Distribution.References
- https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/04/29/how-discourage-student-cheating-online-exams-opinion
- https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/assessmentresources/designing-effective-online-assessment
- Deepti Chavan, Bhushan Nemade, Bhavika Nemade,” Methodologies for Enhancing the Quality of Exam Question Paper Setting and its Evaluation”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 53-59,2018.
- Lochan Jolly, Rutvi Thakkar,” Impact of Evaluation System on Student’s Learning Pattern”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 18-23,2018.
- Prachi Janrao, Ruta Pathak,” Evaluation & Assessment Tools in Engineering Education”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 9-11,2018.
- Looney, J. W., “Assessment and Innovation in Education”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 24, OECD,2009
- Matthew Allen,” Authentic Assessment and the Internet: Contributions within Knowledge Networks” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA,Oct 26, 2009 in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-76-1. 8. Brophy, Jere, “Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students to Learn” Educational Leadership, v45 n2 p40-48 Oct 1987.
- B. Arend, “Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online college courses” The Online Learning Consortium's, Published in 2007.
- Dawn Birch, Michael Volkov,” Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English second language (ESL) students” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 23, Number 3, Jan 01, 2007 ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
- Christine Greenhow, Beth Robelia,” Informal Learning and Identity Formation in Online Social Networks”. Learning, Media and Technology Volume 34, Number 2, June 2009 ISSN 1743- 9884.
- Lilia Juele, Rockland Community College (SUNY), United States,” Authentic Assessments: A Critical thinking and Engagement Tool for Online Courses” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC, Jun 25, 2018.
- Ence Surahman, Agus Wedi, Sulthoni, Yerry Soepriyanto, Punaji Setyosari, ”Design of Peer Collaborative Authentic Assessment Model Based on Group Project Based Learning to Train Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students”. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 285. International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2018).
- Dr. Wendy Barber, Sherry King and Sylvia Buchanan,” Problem Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Digital Pedagogy: Embracing the Role of Collaborative Communities” The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 13 Issue- 2, 2015.
- Richard Osborne, Elisabeth Dunne and Paul Farrand,” Integrating technologies into ‘‘authentic’’ assessment design: an affordances approach”. Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 21, 2013, Coaction Publishing.
- Todd J. B. Blayone, Roland vanOostveen, Wendy Barber, Maurice DiGiuseppe and Elizabeth Childs,” Democratizing digital learning: theorizing the fully online learning community model”. Blayone et al. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2017) 14:13. DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0051-4.
- Mischelle Taylor Stone, Suzanne PerumeanChaney,” The Benefits of Online Teaching for Traditional Classroom Pedagogy: A Case Study for Improving Face-to-Face Instruction”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2011.
- Miller, Sandra L.,” Teaching an Online Pedagogy MOOC”. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching . Mar2015, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p87-102. 16p.
- Olfos, R., & Zulantay, H. (2007),”Reliability and Validity of Authentic Assessment in a Web Based Course”. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 156-173.
- Maria Hanifah, Alfred Irambona,” Authentic assessment: Evaluation and its application in science learning”. August 2019. Psychology Evaluation.
- Revitalizing Engineering and Technology Education in Maharashtra: Strategies for Restoring Balance in the Ecosystem
Authors
1 Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No SP (2023), Pagination: 19-25Abstract
Despite the fact that India has made significant progress in engineering and technical education over the last two decades, maintaining student admission and enrollment intact, particularly in engineering programs, is a desirable goal for many institutions and universities. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the issue of declining admissions to engineering/technology branches in Maharashtra, as well as the need to make core engineering courses more appealing to prospective students. current trends in engineering admissions vis-à-vis intake admission vacancy, uncertainty of opening and shutting down of colleges, and irregularity in opting courses. To address this issue, it suggests a number of corrective and preventive measures, including improving core engineering courses, working with industries to assist students in attaining employment, encouraging and promoting research in fundamental engineering fields, offering internships and financial aid, and educating the general public and students about the importance of core engineering courses. By adopting the required measures to make basic engineering areas appealing to students, the study emphasizes how important it is to preserve the dynamic ecosystem of engineering and technology education.Keywords
Admission, Core Engineering Branches, Disproportion, Corrective Measures, Preventive Measures.References
- Palit, S.K., Mani, N. and Lithgow, B., “Computer- aided undergraduate electronic study programme”.Proc. Pacific Region Conf. on Electrical Engng. Educ. (PRCEEE,97), Wollongong University, NSW, Australia, 163-168 (1997).
- Rajaraman, V., “Undergraduate computer science and engineering curriculum in India”. IEEE Trans. on Educ., 36, 1 (1993). https://dte.maharashtra.gov.in/
- Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Stanford, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Tilak, J. B. G., & Choudhury, P. K. (2021). Paradoxes and contradictions in the growth of engineering education in India. Working Paper 1/2021. New Delhi: Council for Social Development.
- VIF: Vivekananda International Foundation. (2019). Towards more effective education: Emergence of stem education in India. VIF Taskforce Report. Vivekananda International Foundation.
- http:/www.aicte.com/policiesprog.html
- https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/aicte-set-to-ease-norms-to-boost-admissions-in-core-engg-courses-101676139496731.html
- AICTE. (2015). Technical education in India: A futuristic scenario (Report of the AICTE Review Committee, 2015). [Chairperson: M. K. Kaw].
- AICTE. (2018). Engineering education in India: Short- and medium-term perspectives. [Report of the Committee chaired by B. V. Mohan Reddy]. All India Council for Technical Education.
- Student Professional Development: Fostering Critical Thinking among Students
Authors
1 Principal, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
2 Professor, Electronic and Telecommunications Department Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
3 Assistant Professor, H&S Department, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No SP (2023), Pagination: 32-42Abstract
Student Professional Development is defined as the activities that enable to supplement and complement the curricular or main syllabi activities. These are the very important part and parcel of educational institutions to develop the students‟ personality as well as to strengthen the classroom learning directly or indirectly. Professional development (PD) can be defined in diverse ways and can take many forms. Formal education is classroom education, with nonformal considered as “any organized, systematic, educational activity, carried on outside the framework of the formal system, to provide selected types of learning to a particular subgroup in the population. A problem higher education faculty face is the lack of a framework for holistic student professional development and assessment. Such a framework can serve as a bridge between academic and professional identity development This article presents the framework planned in the institute for professional development of students where the students learn by Informal education by association and affiliation, specifically, “the life-long process by which every person acquires and accumulates knowledge, skills, attitudes, and insights from daily experiences and exposure to the environment. The idea is to facilitate an academic mixed with co-curricular and extra co-curricular culture so that they can participate as effectively . Our mixed-methods study examined the impact of many activities leadership, classroom experiences, and sociocultural levels; the findings inspire new directions for program design with key insights for student PD program evaluation.Keywords
Educational change, impact evaluation, professional development.References
- Abid el Majidi a,* , Daniel Janssen b , Rick de Graaff c a Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, Utrecht, the Netherland, System 101 (2021) 102576 PG 1-15
- Ahmed Albadi*, Solomon Arulraj David , The British University in Dubai, UAE , Science Arena Publications Specialty Journal of Knowledge Management 2019, Vol, 4 (4): 44-53
- Fizza Anwer Activity-Based Teaching, Student Motivation and Academic Achievement Forman Christian College, Pakistan ,Journal of Education and Educational Developement Vol. 6 No. 1 (June 2019) Jacqkeline n Zeeman et al. December 2019American Journal of Pharmaceutical education 83(10):7354DOI:10.5688/ajpe7354
- JEANETTE Falk and Nolte et al. , University of Salzburg, Austria ,arXiv:2211.08963v1 [cs.HC] 16 Nov 2022 PAGE 1020
- Kraiger, K., Ford, J., Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-32 National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) 2017 Impact Review https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/2404/impactreview2017.pdf pg 1-20
- Quinones, M.A. and Ehrenstein, A. (1997). Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research. Washington,D.C.:American Psychological Association, p. 154.
- Radhika Amashi, et al., 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp.174-179, 2022. S Das et al. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429321368-2/magazine-publishing-innovation-simon-das
- Woaswi, W., Hamzah, N., & Azid, A. (2018). Journal of Applied and Fundamental Sciences, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v10i1s.12
- Developing Progressive Engineering Curriculum for Global Acceptance and Sustainability
Authors
1 Department of Computer Engineering,Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
2 Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
3 Department of Computer Engineering, Thakur college of Engineering and Technology, Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No SP (2023), Pagination: 43-48Abstract
Engineering education of the 21st century demands to be knowledge-based with rich innovation and value creations. On graduation, one should have an engineering career of 40 years. Therefore, learners shall develop the needful KSA and ACM who can not only do the traditional and routine jobs but also give the vision, create new avenues, create new jobs, help the industry to diversify the activities for sustainability, and provide the individual a lifelong career. It demands an evolving curriculum that should not only comply with the university curriculum but also fulfill the needs of the hour by providing flexibility, acceptability, and agility. TCET understands the needs and hence always strives to bring excellence and relevance to the curriculum. Being autonomous from A. Y. 2019-20 onwards, the college has the freedom to design its own curriculum, not only trying to comply with the requirements of affiliated universities but also trying to achieve global excellence in the field of technical education. The revision cycle has been set for three years. The curriculum highlights that practical & practice-based learning, problem & project-based learning, industry & research orientation, and pedagogy supplemented with andragogy & heutagogy have made the curriculum unique. The strategy and approach for curriculum design have not only made the institute achieve various compliances but also made the curriculum evolutionary and well-accepted by stakeholders including industry.Keywords
KSA, Curriculum, NEP 2020, Accreditation, Design and Development (DAD).References
- https://www.aicte-india.org/education/model-syllabus
- National Education Policy 2020, NCERT, Ministry of Education, NEP_2020.pdf (ncert.nic.in).
- https://gate.iitk.ac.in/gate_syllabus.html
- https://illinois.edu/academics/
- https://mu.ac.in/syllabus
- https://dsel.education.gov.in/sites/default/files/update/National_Credit_Framework.pdf
- Lab in Bag for Higher and Technical Education
Authors
1 Electronics and Telecommunication Thakur College of Engineering and Technology Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No SP (2023), Pagination: 49-55Abstract
In order to generate future entrepreneurs capable of resolving challenges with the use of technology, institutions must implement programs that foster students' holistic development. To facilitate holistic development of students, NEP 2020 emphasizes on collaboration, communication, research, problem solving, critical thinking, and creativity skills that students need to be successful in today's world. NEP 2020 suggests to introduce blended learning environment which shows students the scientific method that can be applied to everyday life with emphasis on more practical oriented education unlike traditional science and math education. Students will become solution providers if they spend time in laboratories for experimentation and research. According to the current situation, higher and technical education curriculum provide limited time for practical work, and even if a student wishes to work extra during free periods, there are few resources available during working hours because there are very few labs and they are occupied with the regular curriculum conduct. Due to these limitations, students have fewer number of opportunities to discover solutions for real-world issues and applications. Access to the laboratory and laboratory equipment beyond working hours is the need of the hour. This is the reason for developing “Lab in Bag” to provide learning environment beyond working hours. Through these laboratory equipment’s, students will have access to a variety of hardware devices at home to explore and expand their knowledge. This will develop innovation and creativity in them. This philosophy can be achieved with the advantages of miniaturized and low-cost equipment and facilities. The focus of “Lab in Bag” is technical subjects involving hardware Experiments. The expected outcome of this setup is that it will provide students with a flexible platform which gives them opportunities to learn using reliable and economical setups. To measure performance of the “Lab in Bag” devices, experimentation is done using traditional equipment and equipment provided in Lab in Bag. This study explains that results with 0.002% error margin can be achieved with 30MHz-2Channel Oscilloscope and Digital Oscilloscope for Analog and Devices Electronics experiments. It further establishes positive correlation of flexibility, connectivity and reliability with usability. Positive correlation of these parameters shows that students are highly interested in using “Lab in Bag” for continuing research and innovation.Keywords
Innovation, “Lab in Bag”, experimentation, Analytical Study, Statistical Analysis, Correlation.References
- OECD (2010a), The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow, OECD Publishing
- OECD (2010b), The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, OECD Publishing
- A. Zollman, "Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning," School Science and Mathematics, vol. 112, pp. 12-19, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
- Ian Grout, “Supporting Access to STEM Subjects in Higher Education for Students with Disabilities using Remote Laboratories”, 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), vol. 15, pp. 7-13, 2015.
- A. Maiti, A. D. Maxwell and A. A. Kist, "An Overview of System Architectures for Remote Laboratories," in TALE 2013, pp. 661-666, 2013.
- D. Z. Deniz, A. Bulancak, and G. Ozcan, "A novel approach to remote laboratories, ", Vol. I, pp. T3E·8-T3E-12, 2003.
- S. K. Esche, "Remote experimentation-one building block in online engineering education, " dynamical systems, vol. 4, p. 6, 2002.
- S. K. Esche, "On the Integration of Remote Experimentation into Undergraduate Laboratories--Pedagogical Approach, " International Journal of Instructional Media, vol. 32, p. 11, 2005.
- T. F. Junge and C. Schmid, "Web-based remote experimentation using a laboratory-scale optical tracker, " vol. 4, pp. 2951-2954, 2000.
- C. Schmid, "A remote laboratory using virtual reality on the Web, " Simulation, vol. 73, pp. 13-21, 1999.
- C. S. Tzafestas, N. Palaiologou, and M. Alifragis, "Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: Comparative experimental evaluation, " Education, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 360-369, 2006.
- Alexander A. Kist et al, “The Game and Activity Environment of RALfie”, 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), vol. 16, pp. 324-325, 2016.
- William H. Roden, Rebecca A. Howsmon, Rebecca A. Carter, Mark Ruffo and Amanda L. Jones, “Improving Access to Hands-On STEM Education using a Mobile Laboratory”, Journal of STEM Outreach, vol. 1, pp. 61-70, 2018.
- Ian Grout. “Remote Laboratories as a Means to Widen Participation in STEM Education”, Education Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 1-18, 2017.