Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- E. Sanjay
- A. Sachin
- M. Uma
- A. B. Raju
- N. Iyer
- S. Ajit
- S. Raghu
- S. Huddar
- G. Arun
- B. L. Desai
- Ashok Shelter
- Gururaj Fattepur
- S. B. Burli
- G. Jangali Satish
- B. S. Kakol
- S. V. Khandal
- Shivashankar Huddar
- Prashant Achari
- Sanjay Eligar
- Uma Mudenagudi
- Nalini Iyer
- Arun Giriyapur
- Nitin Kulkarni
- Ashok Shettar
- Shivaprasad Mukhandmath
- Rajashekhar Savadi
- Gopalkrishna Joshi
- Vinayak N. Kulkarni
- V. N. Gaitonde
- Satish Chikkamath
- Raghavendra Shet
- P. Praveen
- C. I. Nalini
- Shreeshail M. L.
- Suresh H. K.
- Gurupadayya Hiremath
- Balachandra S. Halemani
- Ashish G. Kulkarni
- Anil Kundaragi
- Jangali Satish G.
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kotturshettar, B. B.
- Engineering Design: A Sophomore Course for Undergraduates in Electrical Sciences
Abstract Views :146 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
E. Sanjay
1,
A. Sachin
1,
M. Uma
1,
A. B. Raju
1,
N. Iyer
1,
S. Ajit
1,
S. Raghu
1,
S. Huddar
1,
G. Arun
1,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
B. L. Desai
1,
Ashok Shelter
1
Affiliations
1 B V Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, IN
1 B V Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No Spl Iss (2015), Pagination: 196-201Abstract
In this era of technological advances many engineering solutions have improved the quality of living for mankind. The focus has been on innovative designs in engineering education. This process has to be strengthened by engineering the design across all domains of engineering. Engineering Design as a course has been offered by universities restricting the curriculum to Mechanical Sciences. particularly in the domain of Mechanical and Industrial Production Engineering. The need to evolve pedagogy for Electrical Sciences students is the challenge which has been addressed through this paper. Curriculum design and delivery, course outcomes and attainments of an undergraduate course for Electrical Sciences is presented here. Pedagogical practices include domain specific case studies, skill development in laboratory, activity based learning, course projects and continuous evaluation. The implementation of course is analyzed with respect to attainment of the outcomes (ABET a-k). Validation of some of the course outcomes is demonstrated through sample case studies as applied to the specific domain of Electronics & Communication, Electrical & Electronics, and Instrumentation Technology (ECE, EEE, IT).Keywords
Engineering Design, Electrical Sciences, ABET Outcomes, Curriculum Design.- Defining the Performance Indicators: A Framework for Program Outcomes' Attainment
Abstract Views :165 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Industrial & Production Engineering Department, B V B College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli - 580031, Karnataka, IN
1 Industrial & Production Engineering Department, B V B College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli - 580031, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No Spl Iss (2015), Pagination: 298-301Abstract
The attainment of Program Outcomes (PO) at the time of graduation is a measure of the competence of engineering graduates. The program outcomes are generic and have wide scope for interpretation by the faculty member depending upon his/her experience and judgment. Therefore, the attainment process might end up with either measuring too many things making the entire exercise very hectic or measuring too little that may not be sufficient to capture the intent of the outcome. Nowadays the practice is to expand each of the program outcomes into a set of outcome elements. As a result, the faculty members can use these elements in adapting the outcomes to their courses. Even with the elements being known, many a times it is a difficult proposition especially for the novice and in-experienced faculty members to plan their delivery and assessment mechanism. The reason being each element may involve several attributes or stages before it is fully understood. An attempt has been made to identify those logical stages as performance indicators for each of the outcome elements. Performance indicators provide faculty members with enough resolution for planning effective delivery and assessment modes leading to meaningful attainment of program outcomes.Keywords
Program Outcomes, Outcomes Elements, Performance Indicators, Course Outcomes.- A Systematic Approach for the Conduct of Engineering Design Projects
Abstract Views :196 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Industrial and Production Engineering, B. V. B. College of Engineering and Technology, Hubballi, Karnataka, IN
1 Dept. of Industrial and Production Engineering, B. V. B. College of Engineering and Technology, Hubballi, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No Spl Iss (2016), Pagination:Abstract
The engineering design process is a methodical series of steps that engineers use in creating functional products and processes. The process is highly iterative process involving a cyclical process of idea generation, evaluation, and design improvement until the design requirement is met. It is a widely used design strategy due to its intuitive nature and effectiveness in facilitating design improvement, hence calls for the need of the hour to enhance students' cognitive levels. Engineering design courses can be best learnt through practical learning (often termed as Project Based Learning) by course projects, thus delivering this course in the early stages of mechanical science engineering students by offering projects as pedagogy is often a challenge on the part of the tutor. This paper collectively presents simple techniques adapted in conducting the projects for third semester undergraduate Industrial Production engineering students. A systematic approach was followed in the formation of the student teams, proposing the problem statements, students preparing for the reviews according to scheduled timelines, modeling the prototypes, conducting the reviews and preparing the PowerPoint presentations and project reports. By following this pedagogical method Program Outcome (c: Ability to design systems, components, or processes to meet customer needs) and (g: Ability to communicate effectively in both oral and written forms and to become proficient in working with diverse teams) were mapped for the assessment. It was also observed that there was an improvement in the PO attainment, a better team dynamics were observed, the quality of the projects was enhanced in terms of better idea generation, report writing and power point presentation also proved a better quality.Keywords
Engineering Design, Course Projects.- Continuous Internal Evaluation:In a True Sense
Abstract Views :270 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Mechanical Department, BVBCET, Hubli-580031, IN
2 IPE department, BVBCET, Hubli-580031, IN
1 Mechanical Department, BVBCET, Hubli-580031, IN
2 IPE department, BVBCET, Hubli-580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No Spl Iss (2016), Pagination:Abstract
It has been experienced that an event based evaluation system always fails to evaluate the real learning of a student, as it emphasizes on memory based preparation and fails to provide the information on regularity in learning. Further, it is needed to engage students who are less oriented academically in learning and assessed in quick successions so that they are not burdened of preparing too much for the examination that are conducted after a long gap. Hence, it is always advisable to spread the evaluation evenly to entire span of the learning period. In the education system there were some efforts to reduce the period in between the evaluation events and it is successfully reduced to 6 weeks in a semester as of today. Still this period is not providing the continuity in the evaluation as this period also is considerably large. The paper proposes, weekly test as an effevtive tool to reduce the gap between Continuous Internal Evaluations (CIE) and this performance is considered as major component of overall CIE for theory courses. The paper provides the performance improvements in CIE of students in various courses and proves to be a better assessment process.Keywords
Weekly Test, CIE, Standard Deviation, Assessment, Feedback.- Enhancement of Multidisciplinary PDR Course
Abstract Views :172 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Shivashankar Huddar
1,
Prashant Achari
1,
Sanjay Eligar
1,
Uma Mudenagudi
1,
Nalini Iyer
1,
A. B. Raju
1,
Arun Giriyapur
1,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nitin Kulkarni
1,
Ashok Shettar
1
Affiliations
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No 2&3 (2015), Pagination: 62-68Abstract
This paper discusses enhancement in development of project-based 'product design and realization (PDR)' course for undergraduate students. The course offered at an early stage of the curriculum is aimed at providing engineering design and product realization skills to the students. Creating an appropriate learning experience in product design is challenging owing to its multidisciplinary nature. An innovative multidisciplinary design-to-realization approach is adopted in this course and student teams are required to design and build working prototypes for predefi ned products. This course brings a new perspective to the multidisciplinary approach to teaching product design. Introduction of project based design experience at an early level provides students with an opportunity to develop capabilities to design complex systems in the future. PDR (a 3 credit course) introduced to electrical and mechanical sciences students (EC, EE, IT, IP, A&R, ME) at fourth semester (2nd year) level of engineering in BVBCET, Hubli. The implementation of course is analyzed with respect to attainment of the outcomes (ABET a-k). Also to illustrate the success of the course, the work of students in the form of Product at the end of course is included in results for validation.Keywords
Design, Electrical and Mechanical Sciences, Outcomes (ABETa-k).- Adopting Open-Ended Exercise and Self-Study Modes to Implement Contextual Learning Approach to Enhance Engineering Knowledge/Skills
Abstract Views :196 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Industrial and Production Engineering, BVBCET, Hubli, IN
1 Dept. of Industrial and Production Engineering, BVBCET, Hubli, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 91-94Abstract
Contextual learning is one of the best ways to convey students the concepts that are being taught in a subject area to real industrial problems so that students are exposed to provide a real-world, product-based framework to integrate and expand the learning experiences from different courses and lab exercises and can enhance their engineering knowledge and skills. This innovative teaching learning process of Contextual Learning is being adopted in the Department of Industrial and Production Engineering for the students of third semester to eight semester and context of study is ASME #150 Gate Valve. This paper focuses on adopting this practice for third and fourth semester students in understanding the generalised design procedure and assembly of valve. Activities were carried out through an open ended experiment in Engineering Design Lab of third semester and a Self study component in Design of Machine Elements at fourth semester to convey the modelling and design concepts of gate valve. This paper concludes with the challenges encountered for the continual improvement for adopting this method of learning.g.Keywords
Integrated Approach, Product-Based Learning.- An Experience of Teaching Engineering Design for Freshman Students
Abstract Views :194 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Shivaprasad Mukhandmath
1,
Shivashankar Huddar
2,
Rajashekhar Savadi
1,
Gopalkrishna Joshi
3,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nalini Iyer
2,
Ashok Shettar
4
Affiliations
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No SP 1 (2019), Pagination: 43-48Abstract
In recent years design thinking has taken center stage in the engineering curriculum. The driving force being the society and industries who need graduate engineers who can design, innovative, and creative products to help solve the real-world problems. The current paper discusses the experiences of a systematic approach in defining, teaching, and assessing the engineering design process to freshman engineering students at KLE Technological University (KLETU). The paper begins by defining 'design thinking' followed by briefly reviewing the role of engineering design and its importance in the engineering curriculum. Design is hard to learn but hardest to teach. Efforts have been made, in this work, to bring in the perspective of the pedagogy of activity-based teaching and its challenges and opportunities in teaching engineering design process at the freshman engineering level. This pedagogical approach, for freshman level, resulted in enhanced students learning.Keywords
Design, Freshman Engineering, Activity, Learning.References
- Mourtos NJ. Defining, teaching, and assessing engineering design skills. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 2012; 2(1): 14–30.
- McDonald WM, Brogan DS, and Lohani VK et al., Developing a first-year engineering course at a university in India: international engineering education collaboration.
- Ambrose SA and Amon CH. Systematic Design of a FirstYear Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education; 86(2): 173– 181. URL 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00281.x.
- Genco N, Hölttä-Otto K, and Seepersad CC. An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 2012; 101(1): 60–81.
- Julie D. Burton and Daniel M. White, Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Education, 1999, 88(3), 327-332
- Payton LN. Design for manufacturing excellence (DFMX) begins at the freshman level. Journal of manufacturing systems 2005; 24(3): 178.
- Khalaf K, Balawi S, Hitt GW et al. Engineering Design Education: When, What, and How. Advances in Engineering Education 2013; 3(3): n3.
- Sanjay E, Sachin A, Uma M et al. Engineering Design: A Sophomore Course for Undergraduates in Electrical Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2015; 196–201.
- Patil AY, Shivaprasad M, and Kodancha KG. Infusing Design Techniques-An Integrated Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2016.
- Dym CL and Little P. Engineering design: a project-based approach (2000).
- Hubka V and Eder WE. Pedagogics of design education. International Journal of Engineering Education 2003; 19(6): 799–809.
- Stojcevski A. Learning to solve ‘design problems’ in engineering education. Washington Accord http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Hitory/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL pdf 2014.
- An Approach to Develop and Integrate Existing Curriculum to Theme Based Curriculum Structure for Strengthening Postgraduate Studies in Engineering Education
Abstract Views :243 |
PDF Views:93
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, Karnataka, IN
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No 3 (2020), Pagination: 26-36Abstract
In today's higher education system, the concept of specialization plays a vital role in the career development of engineering students across the world. Meanwhile, the requirement for automation engineers in manufacturing sector is increasing continuously due to upgradation of the technology in today's industrial scenario. The methodology of theme based curriculum design and its integration to the existing curriculum along with the assessment pattern have been explained throughout the paper. The results and attainment of performance indicators have been analyzed. It is found that the percentage attainment have improved from initial conventional laboratory experiments to final open-ended experiment of laboratory course leading to active learning among students.Keywords
Postgraduate Program, Curriculum Design, Theme Based Curriculum, Program Outcome, Performance Indicators, Higher Engineering Education.References
- Dickie Carolyn and Jay Leighton, 2010, Innovation in Postgraduate Teaching: Mixed Methods to Enhance Learning and Learning, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol . 29, No . 1, 2010, pp . 29 - 43 . DOI : 10.1080/07294360903421376
- M. J. Servan, E. Soto, J. F. Murillo, M. Sola and A. I. Perez, 2009, Problem-based learning and action research in postgraduate teaching: the interdisciplinary core, Educational Action Research, Vol.17, No.3, pp.373-389.
- Vinayak Kulkarni, V. N. Gaitonde and R. G. Mench, 2016, Attainment of Projec t Management and Finance graduate Attribute (GA) for Post Graduate Program in Engineering through Course project, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol.29, No.3, pp.1-7.DOI:10.16920/jeet/2016/v29i3/85187
- Jane Tobbell, Victoria O'Donnell and Maria Zammit, 2010, Exploring transition to postgraduate study: shifting identities in interaction with communities, practice and participation, Journal of British Educational Research Journal, Vol.36, No.2, pp.261-278.DOI: 10.1080/01411920902836360
- Dodge, D. T., 1995, The importance of curriculum in achieving quality child day care programs, Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice and Program, Vol.74, No.6, pp.11711188.
- Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P., 1998, Why curriculum matters in early childhood education, Educational Leadership, Vol.55, No.6, pp.57-60.
- Melear, C. T. & Lunsford, E., 2007, Worms cultivate our curriculum: A long-term, themebased unit, Science Activities-Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms, Vol.44, No.2, pp.48-54. DOI: 10.3200/SATS.44.2.48-54
- Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P., 1998, Development of theme-based, Interdisciplinary, Integrated curriculum: A Theoretical model, School Science and Mathematics, Vol.98, No.6, pp.312-319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17426.x
- Halimah Tussa'diah and Kiki Nurfadillah, 2018, The Implementation of Theme Based Teaching to Improve Students' Achievement in Narrative Text, The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, KnE Social Sciences,pp.352–360.DOI : 10.18502/kss.v3i4.1946
- Berry, C.F., Mindes, G., & Sweat L., 1993, Planning a theme-based curriculum: goals, themes, activities, and planning guides for 4s and 5s, Glenview, IL: Good Year Books.ISBN: 0673464091 9780673464095
- Vinayak Kulkarni, Sanjay Kulkarni, Jangali G. Satish, V.N. Gaitonde, 2017, Attainment of major competencies of program-specific outcome in industrial engineering and simulation lab through open - ende d e xperiment, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, Vol 27, No.3,pp.183-197. DOI : 10.1504/IJCEELL.2017.084840
- Effective utilization of Maker Space for Facilitating Product Realization Course
Abstract Views :296 |
PDF Views:154
Authors
Affiliations
1 KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar Hubballi-580031, IN
1 KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar Hubballi-580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No 3 (2020), Pagination: 37-42Abstract
Realistic teaching, education learning curriculum and learning setup such as maker's space is very much essential to succeed the impact of Industry 4.0 on industrial engineering (IE). The Makers Space is a state of art facility created to promote product development and realization eco-system in KLE Technological University campus and is administered by the college as a resource for all engineering departments. Design and manufacturing are interdependent process. The curriculum of the verticals present in respective department should address the interdependency. The Makers space provides modern design, prototyping and manufacturing facilities like 3D printer, Laser cutting machine, PCB etching machine which helps to realize any electro mechanical product. The students were made to avail the maker space facility by undergoing a safety training session, the safety session emphasizes on the personal safety in the workshop, safe handling of the equipment. The aim of engineering design and product realization course is to align students to be conversant with the modern manufacturing facility like Makers space and indeed support the students and entrepreneurs to convert their product ideas into reality. The facilities encourage student teams, faculty members and entrepreneurs working towards creating products to realize our national dream - Make in IndiaKeywords
Prototyping, Make In India, Makers Space.References
- John S. Lamancusa, Jens E. Jorgensen, Jose L. Zayas-Castro, Julie Ratner ―The Learning Factory - A new approach to integrating design and manufacturing into engineering curriculaǁ 1995 ASEE Conference Proceedings June 2528, 1995
- R C Putra, I H Kusumah, M Komaro, Y Rahayu, E P Asfiyanur ―Design Learning of Teaching Factory in Mechanical Engineeringǁ IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 306 (2018) 012104 doi:10.1088/1757- 899X/306/1/012104
- Rentzos L A, et al . 2014 Integrating Manufacturing Education with Industrial Practice using Teaching Factory Paradigm: A Construction Equipment Application Procedia CIRP 17 pp 189 – 194.
- Dimitris M, et al. 2017 A Web-based Application for Classifying Teaching and Learning Factories 7th Conference on Learning Factories, CLF 2017: Procedia Manufacturing 9 pp. 222 – 228.
- John S L, et al. 1997 The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum Journal of Engineering Education
- The Making of an Engineer - An illustrated history of engineering education in the United States and Canada, Lawrence Grayson, John Wiley and Sons, 1993.
- S. Chikkamath, N. Vannal, R. M. Shet, P. C. Nissimgoudar and N. C. Iyer, "Experiential Learning: Learning through Projects," 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), Madurai, 2016, pp. 251-257. Doi: 10.1109/MITE.2016.057
- Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, R.M. Felder, L.K.Silverman; Engineering Education 78(7), April 1988, pp 674-681.
- Cognitive Aspects of Learning and Teaching Science, Jose P. Mestre, Pre-College Teacher Enhancement in Science and Mathematics: Status, Issues and Problems, S. J. Fitzsimmons and L.C. Kerpelman (Eds.), Washington DC:NSF
- R. M. Shet, N. C. Iyer, P. C. Nissimgoudar, S. Ajit, “Integrated Experience: Through Project based Learning”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education, Springer, New Delhi, Pg 479-486, Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1931-6
- Matt, Dominik T., Erwin Rauch, and PatrickDallasega. "Mini-factory – A Learning Factory Concept for Students and Small and Medium Sized Enterprises", Procedia CIRP.
- An Attempt to Impart Engineering Drawing Standards Through Problem Based Learning Approach
Abstract Views :216 |
PDF Views:131
Authors
Shreeshail M. L.
1,
Suresh H. K.
2,
Gurupadayya Hiremath
1,
Balachandra S. Halemani
1,
B. B. Kotturshettar
3
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN
3 Professor and Head, School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN
1 Assistant Professor, School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN
3 Professor and Head, School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubli, Karnataka – 580031, IN