Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Industrial Planning in a Human Development Framework–Experiences in Asia


Affiliations
1 Institute of Human Development, Delhi, India
2 Nehru University, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A pro-active industrial policy in contrast to a purely market-led approach is central to achieving success in industrialization, economic growth and poverty reduction. Experiences of mainly China, South Korea, Malaysia, and to some extent, Taiwan suggest that governments played a central role in directing investments, promoting/protecting national industries and fostering R&D before they became mature economies. Evidences from Thailand and Vietnam supplement the point. South Asian countries having weak and uncertain industrial policies have not made any significant headway. Industrial policy alone is not sufficient for an industrial transformation. A sound educational and skill development policy to create human capital is equally important for success. The paper explains why most South Asian and Latin American and sub- Saharan African economies have experienced lesser success compared to East Asian economies.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amsden, Alice H. (1979), Modern China, Vol. 5, No. 3, Symposium on Taiwan: Society and Economy, Jul. 1979: Sage Inc.
  • Amsden, Alice H. (1989),Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, New York: Oxford University Press
  • Asian Development Bank (2017), Human Capital Development in South Asia, Manila
  • ASER (Annual Status of Education Report) (2012),http://www.asercentre.org/education/India/status/p/143.html
  • Aspinall & Fealy (2003) (Eds.), Local Power and Politics in Indonesia, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  • Banerji A & E Duflo (2011), Poor Economics: Rethinking Poverty & the Ways to End it, Kindle e-Edition
  • Basu, K. (2015), An Economist in the Real World, Cambridge: MIT Press
  • Cha, Myung Soo (2004), “Facts and Myths about Korea’s Economic Past”, Australian Review of Economic History 44: 278-93
  • Comim, F. & Martha, Nussbaum (Eds.) (2013), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Das, G.(2000), India Unbound, New Delhi: Penguin
  • Felipe, J., U. Kumar, N. Usui & A. Abdon (2010), Why has China Succeeded and Why It Will Continue to Do So; Working Paper No. 611 Annandale-on-Hudson, NY, The Levy Economics Institute
  • Gabriele, A. (2010), “The Role of the State in China’s Industrial Development: A Reassessment”, Comparative Economic Studies, 52 (3):325-50
  • Haggard S, W Lim & E Kim (2003), Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hsiao W, (1995), “Abnormal Economics in the Health Sector”, Health Policy, 32(1-3): 12539
  • Heilmann, S. (2009); “Maximum Tinkering under Uncertainty: Unorthodox Lessons from China”, Modern China, No. 35, July:45062
  • Heilmann, S & L Shih, (2013), The Rise of Industrial Policy in China, Trier (Germany): Harvard-Yenching Institute Working Paper Series
  • Huck-ju Kwon & M. J. Koo (2013) (Eds.), The Korean Government and Development Policies in a Development Nexus, Seoul: Springer
  • IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2016), Regional Economic Outlook, Asia-Pacific, Chapter 4 at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/2016/apd/eng/pdf/areo0516c4.pdf
  • Jalan, B (1991), India’s Economic Crisis: The Way Ahead, New Delhi: Oxford University Press Joshi, P.C. (1977), Land Reforms in India, Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi.
  • Kolhi, R, (2014),”Should We Worry about the Rise in Incremental Capital-output Ratio?” Mint, March 4
  • Kotz, D.M. (2005), The Role of the State in Economic Transformation: Comparing the Transition Experiences of Russia and China, Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Amherst, MA, University of Massachusetts.
  • Lin, J.Y. (2013), “Demystifying the Chinese Economy”, Australian Economic Review, 46(3): 259-68
  • Mehrotra, S & E.Delamonica (2007),Eliminating Human Poverty. Macro-economic and Social Policies for Equitable Growth, London: Zed Press.
  • Mehrotra, S (2013), “The Capabilities of Women: Towards a New Framework for Development”, in F. Comim and Martha Nussbaum (Eds.), Capabilities, Gender, Equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mehrotra, S, (2016), Realising the Demographic Dividend. Policies to Achieve Inclusive Growth in India, New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mehrotra S & S Acharya (2017), “Planning for Human Development – Experiences in Asia, Theoretical Economics Letters (Scientific Research Publishing)No. 7, Pg. 1607-1631 (https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2017.76109)
  • Mehrotra S & J.K. Parida (2018),”Economic Growth and Human Development in India: Are They Causally Connected during 19932014?” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities (forthcoming)
  • Nell, E. (1998), General Theory of Transformational Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Nussbaum, M. 2001, Women and Human Development, The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Park YC, (1991), Development Lessons from Asia: The Role of Government in Korea and Taiwan, American Economic Review, 80(2): 118-21
  • Poon, D. (2009), China’s Evolving Industrial Policy Strategies and Instruments: Lessons for Development, Working Paper Series, Pretoria: Trade and Industrial Policy Strategies
  • Rodrik, Dani (1997), Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Institute for International Economics, https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/iieppress/57.htm
  • Rodrik, Dani (Ed.) (2003), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
  • Rohde, J.E. & H Viswanathan (1995), Rural Private Health Practitioner, Delhi, Oxford University Press.
  • Sakong, I & Y. Koh (2010), The Korean Economy, Six Decades of Growth and Development, Seoul, Korea Development Institute
  • Sen, A. (1982), Choice, Welfare and Measurement, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Sen, A. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, New Delhi, Oxford University Press
  • Sen, A (2001), Development as Freedom,New York: Oxford University Press
  • Singh G, (2011), Making Sustainable Development Happen, http://www.sgm.org.my/en/?cur=news/view&id=176&title= %22Making_Sustainable_Development_Happen%22
  • Sugden, F. G. Gurung (2013), Absentee Landlordism and Agrarian Stagnation in Nepal, Kathmandu: Nepal Institute of Development Studies.
  • Taylor, L, S, Mehrotra & E. Delamonica (1997), “The Links between Economic Growth, Poverty Reduction and Social Development: Theory and Policy”, in S. Mehrotra &R .Jolly (Eds.),Development with a Human Face: Experiences in Social Achievement and Economic Growth, Oxford: Clarendon.
  • UNDP (2014), Human Capital Dynamics and Industrial Transition in Cambodia, Phnom Penh
  • UNICEF (2013), The State of the World’s Children, New York
  • World Bank (2014), East Asia Pacific at Work: Employment, Enterprise, and Wellbeing, Washington
  • World Bank (2015), World Development Indicators, http://wdi.worldbank.org/tables
  • Yang, Y.H. (1993), “Government Policies and Strategic Industries in Taiwan”, in T Ito and A Kruger (Eds.), Trade and Protectionism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Abstract Views: 243

PDF Views: 1




  • Industrial Planning in a Human Development Framework–Experiences in Asia

Abstract Views: 243  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Sarthi Acharya
Institute of Human Development, Delhi, India
Santosh Mehrotra
Nehru University, New Delhi, India

Abstract


A pro-active industrial policy in contrast to a purely market-led approach is central to achieving success in industrialization, economic growth and poverty reduction. Experiences of mainly China, South Korea, Malaysia, and to some extent, Taiwan suggest that governments played a central role in directing investments, promoting/protecting national industries and fostering R&D before they became mature economies. Evidences from Thailand and Vietnam supplement the point. South Asian countries having weak and uncertain industrial policies have not made any significant headway. Industrial policy alone is not sufficient for an industrial transformation. A sound educational and skill development policy to create human capital is equally important for success. The paper explains why most South Asian and Latin American and sub- Saharan African economies have experienced lesser success compared to East Asian economies.

References