Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Decoding Predatory Publishing Practices for Academia
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Predatory or deceptive publishing is still a persistent issue in scholarly communication. A number of predatory journals are being published, and it is essential to keep them in check as the potential harm they could do to the scientific discourse is enormous. With the Open Science Framework (OSF) project titled "Decoding Predatory Publishing Practices for Academia (DePA)", the authors try to equip users to identify potential predatory journals and endorse ethical and quality publishing. The project will consist of training materials and a rubric developed to examine the quality of an open-access scientific journal by combining the publisher and individual journal aspects. The project includes a rubric consisting of different aspects regarding publication in scientific journals, quantifying the quality of the publishing practices adopted by these journals. Predatory or deceptive publishing is still a persistent issue in scholarly communication. For instance, deceptive publishers could hold the unpublished manuscript indefinitely, and little can be done if the author has signed a copyright transfer agreement. We can reduce the impact of predatory publishers by aiding the scholar community with simple and easy-to-understand devices that help them analyse the journals and publishers themselves. This could be part of the orientation at a researcher’s, library’s, or mentor’s level.
Keywords
Open Access, Open Science, Open Science Framework (OSF), Predatory Publishing.
User
About The Authors
Information
- Anderson, R. (2021). The source/guest post - Why should we worry about predatory journals? Here’s one reason. The Source. Available at: https://blog.cabells.com/2020/03/03/guest-post-why-should-we-worry-about-predatory-journals-heres-one-reason/
- Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R. and Mutz, R. (2021). Growth rates of modern science: A latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00903-w
- Elliott, T. (2021). The source/the rise and rise of predatory journals and conferences. The Source. Available at: https://blog.cabells.com/2021/06/09/the-rise-and-rise-of-predatory-journals-and-conferences/
- McCarthy, N. (2019). The countries leading the world in scientific publications. Statista Infographics. Available at: https://www.statista.com/chart/20347/science-andengineering-articles-published/
- Moher, D., et al. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals, and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a
- Moussa, S. (2021). Contamination by citations: References to predatory journals in the peer-reviewed marketing literature. South Asian Journal of Marketing, 2(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJM-02-2021-0021
- Shen, C. and Björk, B. C. (2015). ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
- Šipka, P. (2012). Legitimacy of citations in predatory publishing: The case of proliferation of papers by Serbian Authors in two Bosnian WoS-indexed journals. https://doi.org/10.5937/CEES-OPS-2012-12-2
- The InterAcademy Partnership (IAP). (n.d.). IAP annual report 2021. In The Interacademy Partnership. IAP. Available at: https://www.interacademies.org/publication/iap-annual-report-2021
- UNESCO. (2021). Facts and figures: Human resources. In UNESCO Science Report. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/node/252277
Abstract Views: 176
PDF Views: 2