Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Benefits and Challenges to Strategic Planning in Public Institutions


Affiliations
1 Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
 

Public institutions represent a major investment for a country. Their existence is externally justified and primarily aimed at improving the lives of citizens. Much hype has been made on increasing the accountability in government and public institutions. To achieve their goals with transparency to its constituency, an institution must think and act strategically. This requires the use of strategic planning models and frameworks; however, much of the research and empirical evidence lies with corporations. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate public institution characteristics and highlight areas where changes to corporate models are required. Benefits and challenges to public institution implementation will be discussed. Finally, the paper will argue for the need to focus more on research and collection of data on strategic planning initiatives worldwide. This would create a greater basin of tools for public institutions and avoid costly mistakes.

Keywords

Public Institutions, Strategy, Planning, Financial Institutions, Government.
User
Notifications

  • Beck, K. (2007). On the purpose of government (abstract). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel InterContinental, New Orleans, LA.
  • Bryson, J. (2004). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations – a guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
  • Bryson, J., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2007). Resourced-based view of strategy and distinctive competencies to work in public organizations. Public administration review, 67(4), 702–717.
  • Business Development Bank of Canada. (2007) Strategic planning.
  • Business Development Bank of Canada. (2007) Strategic planning: a success factor checklist.
  • Clarke, C. (1997). The strategic planning society–the first 30 years. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 327–333.
  • Colson, A. (2007). Quebec Confronting its Future: Some Tools for Public Decision Making. Foresight, 9(1), 67–72.
  • Gantz McKay, E. (2001). Strategic planning: a ten-step guide. Mosaica. Retrieved August 3, 2013 from siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPTEIA/Resources/mosaica_10_steps.pdf.
  • Girishankar, N., & De Silva, M. (1997). Strategic management for government agencies – an institutional approach for developing and transition economies. World Bank Discussion Paper, 386.
  • Hydro One Inc. (2007). Annual report 2006 Appendix B.
  • Hydro Québec. (2006). Strategic plan 2006–2010.
  • Kearns, K. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Public administration review, 54(2), 185–192.
  • Martinelli, F. (1999). Strategic planning manual. The Centre for Public Skills Training.
  • Matheson, A., Scanlan, G., & Tanner, R. (1995). Strategic management in government: extending the reform model in New Zealand. State Services Commission, New Zealand.
  • McInerney, R., & Barrows, D. (2002). Management tools for creating government responsiveness: the Liquor Control Board of Ontario as a context for creating change. The Innovation Journal.
  • Moskow, M. (1978). Strategic planning in business and government. US: Committee for Economic Development.
  • NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet. (2006). 2006–07 Strategic management framework.
  • OECD. (1999). Project on strategic review and reform Canada country paper.
  • OECD. (1999). Project on strategic review and reform country paper The Netherlands.
  • OECD. (1999). Strategic review and reform – Germany.
  • OECD. (1999). Strategic review and reform – The UK perspective.
  • Office of Government Commerce. (2005). Strategic management overview.
  • Office of Government Commerce. (2005). Strategic management workbook.
  • OMERS. (2006). OMERS strategic plan 2006–2008.
  • Proeller, I. (2007). Strategic management for the state – international approaches in comparison. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  • Schieffer, B. (2004). The purpose of government. CBS News.
  • Smith-James, P. (2005). Strategic management in the government of the British Virgin Islands. Caribbean Centre for Development Administration.
  • Stromsnes, D. (1999). OECD – Strategic review and reform – Norway. OECD.
  • Teachers’ Pension Plan. (2007). Mandate of the board including responsibilities described in the Teachers’ Pension Act and the Partners’ Agreement (2007).
  • The Rhode Island Department of Administration. (2004). 2005-2010 Strategic management plan for the Rhode Island geographic information system.
  • The World Bank Group. (2001). Policymakers workshop – Activity 1: a) Assessing the current environment activity & b) Identifying strategic opportunities activity.
  • The World Bank Group. (2007) Local economic development strategic planning – step one: organizing the effort.
  • The World Bank Group. (2007) Local economic development strategic planning – step three: developing the LED strategy.
  • The World Bank Group. (2007) Local economic development strategic planning – step two: conducting the competitive assessment.
  • The World Bank Group. World links for development – Strategic planning and visions statements. Retrieved August 2, 2013 from info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/98771/Policy%20Makers%20workshop/policymakers/docs/pol_mod4_ppt1.pdf
  • Van der Pijl, K., & Sminia, H. (2004). Strategic management of public interest organizations. Internal Journal of
  • oluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(2), pp.137–155.
  • Girishankar, N., & De Silva, M. (1997). Strategic management for government agencies – an institutional approach for developing and transition economies. World Bank Discussion Paper, 386.
  • Hydro One Inc. (2007). Annual report 2006 Appendix B.
  • Hydro Québec. (2006). Strategic plan 2006–2010.
  • Kearns, K. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: An analytical framework. Public administration review, 54(2), 185–192.
  • Martinelli, F. (1999). Strategic planning manual. The Centre for Public Skills Training.
  • Matheson, A., Scanlan, G., & Tanner, R. (1995). Strategic management in government: extending the reform model in New Zealand. State Services Commission, New Zealand.
  • McInerney, R., & Barrows, D. (2002). Management tools for creating government responsiveness: the Liquor Control Board of Ontario as a context for creating change. The Innovation Journal.
  • Moskow, M. (1978). Strategic planning in business and government. US: Committee for Economic Development.
  • NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet. (2006). 2006–07 Strategic management framework.
  • OECD. (1999). Project on strategic review and reform Canada country paper.
  • OECD. (1999). Project on strategic review and reform country paper The Netherlands.
  • OECD. (1999). Strategic review and reform – Germany.
  • OECD. (1999). Strategic review and reform – The UK perspective.
  • Office of Government Commerce. (2005). Strategic management overview.
  • Office of Government Commerce. (2005). Strategic management workbook.
  • OMERS. (2006). OMERS strategic plan 2006–2008.
  • Proeller, I. (2007). Strategic management for the state – international approaches in comparison. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  • Schieffer, B. (2004). The purpose of government. CBS News.
  • Smith-James, P. (2005). Strategic management in the government of the British Virgin Islands. Caribbean Centre for Development Administration.

Abstract Views: 342

PDF Views: 88




  • Benefits and Challenges to Strategic Planning in Public Institutions

Abstract Views: 342  |  PDF Views: 88

Authors

Annie Giraudou
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
Carolan Mclarney
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract


Public institutions represent a major investment for a country. Their existence is externally justified and primarily aimed at improving the lives of citizens. Much hype has been made on increasing the accountability in government and public institutions. To achieve their goals with transparency to its constituency, an institution must think and act strategically. This requires the use of strategic planning models and frameworks; however, much of the research and empirical evidence lies with corporations. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate public institution characteristics and highlight areas where changes to corporate models are required. Benefits and challenges to public institution implementation will be discussed. Finally, the paper will argue for the need to focus more on research and collection of data on strategic planning initiatives worldwide. This would create a greater basin of tools for public institutions and avoid costly mistakes.

Keywords


Public Institutions, Strategy, Planning, Financial Institutions, Government.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15533/sdm%2F2014%2Fv5i1%2F47416