Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Role of Women in Commercial Driving – A Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) Approach


Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore – 641043, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education For Women, Coimbatore - 641043, Tamil Nadu, India
 

Women who work in fields where men predominately do so face particular difficulties and employ particular coping skills that have an impact on their motivation and retention in these fields. This study investigates women’s experiences working in male-dominated sectors to comprehend the challenges they encounter and uncover coping mechanisms that allow them to continue their career paths. A lot of women who first favour jobs with a male preponderance quickly transition to female- or gender-balanced career pathways. Plans to motivate women in sectors with a male preponderance can be made easier by understanding their experiences. This exploratory qualitative study was carried out by the researchers utilizing a constructivist grounded theory methodology. They interviewed 60 well-chosen professional drivers in-depth and unstructured. To examine the data, they employ a constructivist grounded theory methodology. The authors contend that discrimination and sexism are mostly caused by unfair practices that women must deal with. These behaviours include disregarding the special physical traits of women and the necessity of work-life balance. Female resilience includes using femininity, accepting masculinity, mentoring, and intrinsic motivators. This study adds to the corpus of information on better retaining and integrating women in environments where men predominate.

Keywords

Constructivist grounded theory, Gender Discrimination, Male- dominated Profession, Women Workforce, Work-life balance.
User
Notifications

  • Akingbade, R. (2010, November 15). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Blacklash towards Agentic Women aspiring to High-Ranking Jobs in Nigeria. Gender and Behaviour, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/gab.v8i2.61946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/gab.v8i2.61946
  • Andrews, H., Tierney, S., & Seers, K. (2020, January). Needing permission: The experience of self-care and self-compassion in nursing: A constructivist grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 101, 103436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2019.103436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103436
  • Ashraf, M. (2006, June 29). Factors Affecting Female Employment In Male-Dominated Occupations: Evidence From The 1990 And 2000 Census Data. Contemporary Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byl007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byl007
  • Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2001). The practice of social science research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Bagilhole, B. (2006, February 1). Not a glass ceiling more a lead roof. Equal Opportunities International, 25(2), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610679538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610679538
  • Bagilhole, B., & Cross, S. (2006). ‘It never struck me as female’: investigating men's entry into female-dominated occupations. Journal of gender studies, 15(1), 35-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230500486900
  • Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2011, December). Gender Discrimination at Work. Gender & Society, 25(6), 764–786. https://doi. org/10.1177/0891243211424741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211424741
  • Bowen, P., & Cattell, K. (2008, May 2). Job satisfaction of South African quantity surveyors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810867415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810867415
  • Brink, B., & de la Rey, C. (2001, December). Work- Family Interaction Strain: Coping Strategies Used by Successful Women in the Public, Corporate and Self- Employed Sectors of the Economy. South African Journal of Psychology, 31(4), 55–61. https://doi. org/10.1177/008124630103100407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630103100407
  • Cha, Y. (2013). Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & society, 27(2), 158-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212470510
  • Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 4(1), 359-380.
  • Chisholm, L. (2001, December). Gender and Leadership in South African Educational Administration. Gender and Education, 13(4), 387–399. https://doi. org/10.1080/09540250120081742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120081742
  • Chovwen, C. (2004, May 26). Mentoring And Women’s Perceived Professional Growth. IFE PsychologIA, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/ifep.v12i1.23513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ifep.v12i1.23513
  • Chovwen, C.O. (2007). Barriers to acceptance, satisfaction and career growth. Implications for career development and retention of women in selected male occupations in Nigeria. Women in Management Review, 22(1), 68–78. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420710726238 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710726238
  • Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
  • Cooney, A. (2011, July 15). Rigour and grounded theory. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 17–22. https://doi. org/10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.17.c8631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.07.18.4.17.c8631
  • Damaske, S. (2011). A ‘major career woman?’ How women develop early expectations about work. Gender and Society, 25(4), 409–430. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0891243211412050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211412050
  • Danziger, N., & Eden, Y. (2007, April 3). Gender‐related differences in the occupational aspirations and careerstyle preferences of accounting students. Career Development International, 12(2), 129–149. https://doi. org/10.1108/13620430710733622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430710733622
  • Davey, C. L., & Davidson, M. J. (2000, May). The Right of Passage? The Experiences of Female Pilots in Commercial Aviation. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002002
  • Davey, K.M. (2008). Women’s accounts of organisational politics as a gendering process. Gender, Work and Organisation, 15(6), 650–671. http://dx.doi. org/10.117 7/0959353500010002002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00420.x
  • Dodge, M., Valcore, L., & Gomez, F. (2011, November 8). Women on SWAT teams: separate but equal? Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 34(4), 699–712. https://doi. org/10.1108/13639511111180298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511111180298
  • Du Plessis, Y., & Barkhuizen, N. (2012). Career path barriers experienced by women engineers. Paper presented at the 12th European Academy of Management Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved January 14, 2013 from http:// www.optentia.co.za/publications.php
  • Earnshaw, J. (1993, July). PROVING SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE. Women in Management Review, 8(7). https://doi. org/10.1108/09649429310046418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429310046418
  • England, P. (2010, March 19). The Gender Revolution. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi. org/10.1177/0891243210361475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475
  • Feyerherm, A., & Vick, Y. H. (2005, May 1). Generation X women in high technology. Career Development International, 10(3), 216–227. https://doi. org/10.1108/13620430510598337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430510598337
  • Franks, K., Schurink, W., & Fourie, L. (2006). Exploring the social construction of life roles of career-oriented women. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(1), 17–24.
  • Fourie, L., Franks, K., Schurink, W, (2006). Exploring the social construction of life roles of career-oriented women. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 32(1), 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v32i1.222
  • Frome, P. M., Alfeld, C. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (2006, August). Why don’t they want a male-dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359–372. https://doi. org/10.1080/13803610600765786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765786
  • Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968, July). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nursing Research, 17(4), 364. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
  • Gordon-Finlayson., Maunder, R. E., A., Callaghan, J., & Roberts, A. (2012). Behind supervisory doors: Taught master’s dissertation students as qualitative apprentices. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 30-38.
  • Haupt, T., & Madikizela, K. (2009). Why do South African women choose careers in construction?. Acta Structilia:Journal for the Physical and Development Sciences, 16(2), 46-68.
  • Harris, D. A., & Giuffre, P. (2010, May 12). “The Price You Pay”: How Female Professional Chefs Negotiate Work and Family. Gender Issues, 27(1–2), 27–52. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12147-010-9086-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-010-9086-8
  • Hartmann, H. (1976, April). Capitalism, Patriarchy, and Job Segregation by Sex. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(3, Part 2), 137–169. https://doi. org/10.1086/493283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493283
  • Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. IWPR Briefing Paper, 377, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e686432011-001
  • Hicks, B. M., Carlson, M. D., Blonigen, D. M., Patrick, C. J., Iacono, W. G., & MGue, M. (2012). Psychopathic personality traits and environmental contexts: Differential correlates, gender differences, and genetic mediation. Personality Disorders: Theory, research, and treatment, 3(3), 209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025084
  • Hinson, R., Otieku, J., & Amidu, M. (2006). An exploratory study of women in Ghana's accountancy profession. Gender and behaviour, 4(1), 589-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/gab.v4i1.23347
  • Inal Cavlan, G., & Ertan, S. S. (2021). Work-life Balance Coping Strategies of Self-Employed Women: The Case of Nursing Homes Owners in northern Cyprus. International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 28(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbg.2021.10034737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2021.10034737
  • Innstrand, S. T., Langballe, E. M., Falkum, E., & Aasland, O. G. (2011). Exploring within-and between-gender differences in burnout: 8 different occupational groups. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 84, 813-824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0667-y
  • Kelly, K., Terre Blanche, M. & Durrheim, K.(eds.). (1999). Calling it a day: reaching conclusions in interpretive research. Research in Practice: Applied methods for the social sciences.
  • Lewis-Enright, K., Crafford, A., & Crous, F. (2009). Towards a workplace conducive to the career advancement of women. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 35(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v35i1.832
  • Madikizela, K., & Haupt, T. (2010). Influences on women’s choices of careers in construction: A South African study. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, the, 10(1/2), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v10i1-2.1582
  • Mathur‐Helm, B. (2006). Women and the glass ceiling in South African banks: an illusion or reality?. Women in Management Review, 21(4), 311-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610667028
  • Maunder, R. E., Gordon-Finlayson, A., Callaghan, J., & Roberts, A. (2012). Behind supervisory doors: Taught master’s dissertation students as qualitative apprentices. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 30-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.30
  • Mihailides, S., Devilly, G. J., & Ward, T. (2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 16(4), 333-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320401600406
  • Preissle, J. (2000, February). Book Review: The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Field Methods, 12(1), 72–79. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0001200106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0001200106
  • Raghuram, P. (2008). Migrant women in male‐dominated sectors of the labour market: a research agenda. Population, space and place, 14(1), 43-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.472
  • Sargent, P. (2005). The gendering of men in early childhood education. Sex roles, 52, 251-259. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Dillon, L. (2004). Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1300-x
  • Sturges, J. (1999). What it means to succeed: Personal conceptions of career success held by male and female managers at different ages. British journal of management, 10(3), 239-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00130
  • Turner, C., & Astin, F. (2021, March 1). Grounded theory: what makes a grounded theory study? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20(3), 285–289. https://doi. org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa034
  • Urban, B. (2010). A gender perspective on career preferences and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v8i1.293
  • Van Aarde, A., & Mostert, K. (2008, December 12). Workhome interaction of Working females: What is the role of job and home characteristics? SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/ sajip.v34i3.383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v34i3.383
  • Van den Berg, H. S., & Van Zyl, E. S. (2008, December 12). A cross-cultural comparison of the stress experienced by high-level career women. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip. v34i3.726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v34i3.726
  • Ward, J. (2004, February). “Not all Differences are Created Equal.” Gender & Society, 18(1), 82–102. https://doi. org/10.1177/0891243203259503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203259503
  • Watts, J. H. (2009). ‘Allowed into a man's world ‘meanings of work–life balance: Perspectives of women civil engineers as ‘minority’ workers in construction. Gender, work & organization, 16(1), 37-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00352.x
  • Wong, P., Liamputtong, P., Koch, S., & Rawson, H. (2017, April 25). Barriers to regaining control within a constructivist grounded theory of family resilience in ICU: Living with uncertainty. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23–24), 4390–4403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jocn.13768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13768.

Abstract Views: 133

PDF Views: 97




  • Role of Women in Commercial Driving – A Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) Approach

Abstract Views: 133  |  PDF Views: 97

Authors

R.C Banumathi
Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore – 641043, Tamil Nadu, India
D. Vennila
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education For Women, Coimbatore - 641043, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


Women who work in fields where men predominately do so face particular difficulties and employ particular coping skills that have an impact on their motivation and retention in these fields. This study investigates women’s experiences working in male-dominated sectors to comprehend the challenges they encounter and uncover coping mechanisms that allow them to continue their career paths. A lot of women who first favour jobs with a male preponderance quickly transition to female- or gender-balanced career pathways. Plans to motivate women in sectors with a male preponderance can be made easier by understanding their experiences. This exploratory qualitative study was carried out by the researchers utilizing a constructivist grounded theory methodology. They interviewed 60 well-chosen professional drivers in-depth and unstructured. To examine the data, they employ a constructivist grounded theory methodology. The authors contend that discrimination and sexism are mostly caused by unfair practices that women must deal with. These behaviours include disregarding the special physical traits of women and the necessity of work-life balance. Female resilience includes using femininity, accepting masculinity, mentoring, and intrinsic motivators. This study adds to the corpus of information on better retaining and integrating women in environments where men predominate.

Keywords


Constructivist grounded theory, Gender Discrimination, Male- dominated Profession, Women Workforce, Work-life balance.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/sdmimd%2F2023%2F32952