Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Approaches to Ensure Comparability of the Results of Assessment of Customer Loyalty to a Pharmacy


Affiliations
1 The Department of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine
2 The Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


When assessing complex indicators, the problem of comparability of the results often arises. This fully applies to determining the customer pharmacy loyalty. The aim of the research was to determine approaches to ensure comparability of the results of assessing customer pharmacy loyalty and to determine the range of loyalty. The following NPS methods were used to assess customer loyalty to a pharmacy: customer satisfaction, customer segmentation, and Servqual method. In order to collect primary information, a survey of pharmacy clients was conducted using the method of standardized f2f interviews, where 256 respondents were interviewed. To conduct a study of customer loyalty to a pharmacy, a questionnaire was developed to assess the types of loyalty and another questionnaire to determine loyalty based on an assessment of the quality of service. The questions presented in the questionnaire made it possible to take into account the specifics of pharmaceutical activities. The conditions were determined to ensure the comparability of the results obtained, which included the choice of a single scale in points for the survey and the determination of a single base for calculating relative indicators. Application of the Servquаl method showed that 16.5% of the total number of respondents can be considered loyal; the NPS value was 20%; according to customer satisfaction scores, 24% of fully satisfied customers can be considered loyal. Taking into account the selected research methods, customer loyalty ranges from 16.5% to 24%. Thus, the possibility and feasibility of using a set of methods for assessing customer loyalty to a pharmacy is shown, which makes it possible to obtain comparable results and assess loyalty range.

Keywords

Pharmacy, Loyalty, Satisfaction, Loyalty range, Comparability of results.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Day G. S. A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research. 1969; 9(3): 29-35.

  • Guest L. A study of brand loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1944; 28(1): 16–27.

  • Reichheld F. F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review. 2003; 81(12): 46-55.

  • Dick A. S., Basu K. Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science. 1994; 22 (2): 99-113.

  • Oliver R. L. Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing. 1999; 63 (4): 33-44.

  • Lambin J.-J. Market oriented management / Per. from English ed. V.B. Kolchanov. Saint Petersburg: Peter, 2004: 800. 7. Golubkov E.P. Marketing research: theory, methodology and practice. M .: Finpress, 2000: 365.

  • Luneva EA, Gorbunova AV Comprehensive Assessment of consumer loyalty (on the example of a company in the fast food market) // Bulletin of OmSU. Series: Economics. 2006; 4. Available from: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompleksnaya-otsenka-potrebitelskoy-loyalnosti-na-primere-kompanii-na-rynke-bystrogo-pitaniya

  • Prasojo Pribadi, Susi Ari Kristina , Suci Paramitasari Syahlani, Satibi. The empirical test of pharmacist-patient relationship model in hospital pharmacy practice: Indonesia context. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(10):4623-4627. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00795.9 10. Guest L. Brand loyalty—twelve years later. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1955; 39 (6): 405–408.

  • Reichheld F. F., Schefter P. E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web. Harvard Business Review. 2000; 78 (4): 105-113.

  • Sudhahar J., Israel D., Britto A., Selvam M. Service. Loyalty Measurement Scale: A Reliability Assessment / American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2006; 3(4): 1814-1818. Available from: URL: http://thescipub.com/PDF/ajassp.2006.1814.1818.pdf

  • Hofmeyr J., Rice B. Commitment-Led Marketing. The Key to Brand Profits is in the Customer's Mind. N-Y. : John Wiley & Sons. 2000; 320.

  • Coussement K., Bossche V., Bock K. Data accuracy’s impact on segmentation performance: Benchmarking RFM analysis, logistic regression, and decision trees. Journal of Business Research. 2014; 67 (1): 2751-2758.

  • Parasuraman А. et al. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research The Journal of Marketing. 1985; 49(4): 41-50

  • Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. The Journal of Marketing. 1994; 58. (1): 125-131.

  • Howieson B. Quis Auditoret Ipsos Auditores? Can Auditors Be Trusted? Australian Accounting Review. 2013; 23(4): 295-306.

  • Kuronen M., Takala J. Measuring and Developing Customer Satisfaction with the Balanced Critical Factor Index Method. Available from: URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S4_236-244.pdf

  • Muravskaya SA, et al. Approaches to managing consumer loyalty: perspective "3D" // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Management. 2019; 1. Available from: URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podhody-k-upravleniyu-potrebitelskoy-loyalnostyu-perspektiva-3d

  • Pestun I. V., Mnushko Z. M., Ievtushenko O. M.. Marketing research of the Pharmaceutical market in Ukraine: Peculiarities, Trends, Problems, Tendencies. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(4):2049-2054. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00339.1

  • Rejikumar. G, Aswathy Asokan. A, Gopi Kumar. V. Pharmaceutical Marketing: Directions for Customer Orientation. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(8): 3283-3289. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00604.2

  • Verhoef P. C., Lemon K. N., Parasuraman A., Roggeveen A., Tsiros M., Schlesinger L. A. Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing 2009; 85(1): 31-41.


Abstract Views: 151

PDF Views: 0




  • Approaches to Ensure Comparability of the Results of Assessment of Customer Loyalty to a Pharmacy

Abstract Views: 151  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Olena Piven
The Department of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine
Elena Shuvanova
The Department of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine
Irina Tkachenko
The Department of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management, National University of Pharmacy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine
Aleksandr Xrenov
The Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy, Kharkiv,, Ukraine

Abstract


When assessing complex indicators, the problem of comparability of the results often arises. This fully applies to determining the customer pharmacy loyalty. The aim of the research was to determine approaches to ensure comparability of the results of assessing customer pharmacy loyalty and to determine the range of loyalty. The following NPS methods were used to assess customer loyalty to a pharmacy: customer satisfaction, customer segmentation, and Servqual method. In order to collect primary information, a survey of pharmacy clients was conducted using the method of standardized f2f interviews, where 256 respondents were interviewed. To conduct a study of customer loyalty to a pharmacy, a questionnaire was developed to assess the types of loyalty and another questionnaire to determine loyalty based on an assessment of the quality of service. The questions presented in the questionnaire made it possible to take into account the specifics of pharmaceutical activities. The conditions were determined to ensure the comparability of the results obtained, which included the choice of a single scale in points for the survey and the determination of a single base for calculating relative indicators. Application of the Servquаl method showed that 16.5% of the total number of respondents can be considered loyal; the NPS value was 20%; according to customer satisfaction scores, 24% of fully satisfied customers can be considered loyal. Taking into account the selected research methods, customer loyalty ranges from 16.5% to 24%. Thus, the possibility and feasibility of using a set of methods for assessing customer loyalty to a pharmacy is shown, which makes it possible to obtain comparable results and assess loyalty range.

Keywords


Pharmacy, Loyalty, Satisfaction, Loyalty range, Comparability of results.

References