Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Drug Release and Mucoadhesive behavior of Hydrogel in Chemo-Radiotherapy induced Oral Mucositis


Affiliations
1 Gyan Vihar School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur-302017, India
2 Vedica College of Pharmacy, Bhopal 462033, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In vitro drug release investigations are obligatory tool in the drug product development. Mucoadhesion time and viscosity are vitals in adherence with comprehensive period of time. Oral mucositis is a frequent and potentially severe obstacles caused by chemo-radiotherapy. L-Glutamine reported to reduce the length and severity of chemo-radiotherapy induced oral mucositis. Hydrogel is biocompatible, resilient, and mucoadhesive in local delivery of active ingredient in buccal cavity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in vitro drug release, mucoadhesion of L-Glutamine hydrogels. Hydrogels of L-Glutamine containing natural and synthetic bioadhesive polymers (w/w %): Carbopol 934P (0.25-1), Guar gum (0.05-1), Gum acacia (0.15-1) and Sodium Alginate (0.1-1) were prepared along with other adjutants. These hydrogel were evaluated for different physicochemical attributes (pH, viscosity, drug release, mucoadhesion). The prepared hydrogel were homogenous and opaque with suitable pH (6 –7). The formulation containing 0.5% Carbopol 934P (CG2) showed the highest release rate (>85%), order of release rate was Guar gum > Gum acacia > Sodium alginate. Mucoadhesion (>6 hours, CG3<CG2<CA4), shown against copious salivary flow, due to viscosity and bioadhesion bond with mucin and interpenetration of polymer. Types and concentrations of polymers used somewhat affected and considerably diverge in formulation design and their physicochemical, release distinctiveness and adhesiveness. The prepared hydrogel may well bearable, supple, with optimum drug release, and justifiable mucoadhesion in oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy radiotherapy. The present study is limited but other aspects of different formulations should be investigated further.

Keywords

Buccal Drug Delivery, Chemo-Radiotherapy, Oral Mucositis, Hydrogel, L-Glutamine, Mucoadhesion.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bowen JM, Gibson RJ, Keefe DM, Cummins AG, Cytotoxic chemotherapy increases proapoptotic Bax and Bak expression in crypts of the rat and human small intestine, Pathology, 2005, 37, 56–62.
  • Keefe DM, Cummins AG, Dale BM, Kotasek D, Robb TA, Sage RE. Effect of high-dose chemotherapy on intestinal permeability in humans. Clin Sci 1997, 92, 385–389.
  • Brosnan JT, Interorgan amino acid transport and its regulation, J. Nutr., 2003, 133, 6(1), 2068–2072.
  • T. Nagai, Y. Machida, Buccal delivery systems using hydrogels, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 11 (1993) 179-191.
  • S. Singh, S. Jain, M. Muthu, S. Tiwari, R. Tilak, Preparation and evaluation of buccal bioadhesive films containing clotrimazole, AAPS Pharma. Sci. Tech. 9 (2008) 660–667.
  • M. Hamidi, A. Azadi, P. Rafiei, Hydrogel nanoparticles in drug delivery, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 60 (2008) 1638-1649.
  • L. Achar, N.A. Peppas, Preparation, characterization and mucoadhesive interactions of poly(methacrylic acid) copolymers with rat mucosa, J. Control. Release. 31 (1994) 271-276.
  • Y.B. Huang, W. Leobandung, A. Foss, N.A. Peppas, Molecular aspects of muco- and bioadhesion: tethered structures and sitespecific surfaces, J. Control. Release. 65 (2000) 63-71.
  • T. Goto, M. Morishita, N.J. Kavimandan, K. Takayama, N.A. Peppas, Gastrointestinal transit and muco-adhesive characteristics of complexation hydrogels in rats, J. Pharma. Sci. 95 (2006) 462-469.
  • Sanju Manhar and Preeti K. Suresh Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science Vol. 3 (08), pp. 075-079, August, 2013
  • J. Shen, D.J. Burgess, Journal of Controlled Release 219 (2015) 644–651.
  • M. Siewert, J. Dressman, et al, AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 4 (2003) 43–52.
  • Allur HH, Johnston TP, Mitra AK, In; Swarbrick J, Boylan JC. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. Marcel Dekker, NewYork; 1990; 20(3).p. 193-218.
  • Suri S, Christine E, Schmidt. Photopatterned collagen–hyaluronic acid interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomaterialia, 5, 2009, 2385‐2397.
  • Monica AS and Gautami J: Design and Evaluation of Topical Hydrogel Formulation of Diclofenac Sodium for Improved Therapy.Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(5): 1973-80.
  • Choi HG, Oh Y K, Kim C K. In-situ gelling and mucoadhesive liquid suppository containing acetaminophen: enhanced bioavailability. Int J Pharm, 165(01), 1998, 23–32.
  • Zhu Z, Zhai Y, Zhang N, Leng D, Ding P. The development of polycarbophil as a bioadhesive material in pharmacy. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 08(04), 2013, 218–27.
  • El-Didamony AM. A sensitive spectrophotometric method for the determination of propranolol HCl based on oxidation bromination reactions. Drug Testing Anal. 2010, 2, 122-129.
  • Chudasama A, Patel V, Nivsarkar M, Vasu K, Shishoo C. Investigation of microemulsion system for transdermal delivery of itraconazole. J Adv Pharm Technol Res., 2011, 2, 30–38.
  • Puranajoti P, Patil RT, Sheth PD, Bommareddy G, Dondeti P, Egbaria K. Design and development of topical microemulsion for poorly water-soluble antifungal agents, J Appl Res Clin Exp Ther., 2002, 2, 1.`
  • British Pharmacopoeia, Vol. II, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, Stationary Office, London, 2010, 1787.
  • The United States Pharmacopoeia, USP 32, NF 27, Vol. 3, The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Inc, Rockville, MD, 2009, 3425.
  • Gowada BG, Seetharamappa J, Melwanki MB. Indirect spectrophotometric determination of propranolol hydrochloride and piroxicam in pure and pharmaceutical formulations, Anal Sci., 2002, 6, 671-674.
  • The Indian Pharmacopoeia, Vol. III, Controller of Publications, Government of India, Delhi (2010), 1987, 1547-1552.
  • Bodde HE, De Vries ME, and Junginger HE, Mucoadhesive polymers for the buccal delivery of peptide, structure-adhesiveness relationship, J Control. Rel., 1990, 13, 225-231.
  • Rao ZM, Wu QL, Xie GP, Xu HH, Zhang XQ. Determination of propranolol hydrochloride by flow injection chemiluminescence, Fenxi Huaxue, 2004, 32, 160-1662.
  • N. Hassan, R.K. Khar, M. Ali, J. Ali, Development and evaluation of buccal bioadhesive tablet of an anti-emetic agent ondansetron. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 10 (2009) 1085-1092.
  • Jain S, Tiwari M, Chaturvedi SC, Propranolol hydrochloride-diazepam: simultaneous estimation by spectrophotometric method, Indian Drugs, 1998, 35, 696-699.
  • The International Conference on Harmonization, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedure: Text and Methodology, 2005.

Abstract Views: 163

PDF Views: 0




  • Drug Release and Mucoadhesive behavior of Hydrogel in Chemo-Radiotherapy induced Oral Mucositis

Abstract Views: 163  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Praveen Kumar Jain
Gyan Vihar School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur-302017, India
Ritu Gilhotra
Gyan Vihar School of Pharmacy, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur-302017, India
Mohan Lal Kori
Vedica College of Pharmacy, Bhopal 462033, India

Abstract


In vitro drug release investigations are obligatory tool in the drug product development. Mucoadhesion time and viscosity are vitals in adherence with comprehensive period of time. Oral mucositis is a frequent and potentially severe obstacles caused by chemo-radiotherapy. L-Glutamine reported to reduce the length and severity of chemo-radiotherapy induced oral mucositis. Hydrogel is biocompatible, resilient, and mucoadhesive in local delivery of active ingredient in buccal cavity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in vitro drug release, mucoadhesion of L-Glutamine hydrogels. Hydrogels of L-Glutamine containing natural and synthetic bioadhesive polymers (w/w %): Carbopol 934P (0.25-1), Guar gum (0.05-1), Gum acacia (0.15-1) and Sodium Alginate (0.1-1) were prepared along with other adjutants. These hydrogel were evaluated for different physicochemical attributes (pH, viscosity, drug release, mucoadhesion). The prepared hydrogel were homogenous and opaque with suitable pH (6 –7). The formulation containing 0.5% Carbopol 934P (CG2) showed the highest release rate (>85%), order of release rate was Guar gum > Gum acacia > Sodium alginate. Mucoadhesion (>6 hours, CG3<CG2<CA4), shown against copious salivary flow, due to viscosity and bioadhesion bond with mucin and interpenetration of polymer. Types and concentrations of polymers used somewhat affected and considerably diverge in formulation design and their physicochemical, release distinctiveness and adhesiveness. The prepared hydrogel may well bearable, supple, with optimum drug release, and justifiable mucoadhesion in oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy radiotherapy. The present study is limited but other aspects of different formulations should be investigated further.

Keywords


Buccal Drug Delivery, Chemo-Radiotherapy, Oral Mucositis, Hydrogel, L-Glutamine, Mucoadhesion.

References