OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Job Loss due to Automation Technologies: Perceptions of Fairness in the Information Technology Sector of India


Affiliations
1 Department of Professional Studies, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study, addresses a research question on the perception of fairness of job losses due to automation technologies amongst general stakeholders. Jennifer Kim (2018) has shown that job displacement due to automation is perceived to be fairer in the United States when compared to outsourcing. The study by Jennifer Kim (2018) is replicated in this study on a sample drawn from the population of the Indian labour force, limiting it to the millennials and the IT industry. The results indicated that all job displacement is perceived to be unfair, despite the motive behind it. This is contrary to the results obtained from the sample from the United States. Also, there was no statistically significant difference between the perception of fairness towards the job displacement due to automation and outsourcing. Though there was no direct effect of the motive behind the job displacement/lay-off on the perception of fairness, it was found that there were significant indirect effects from the identified 4 mediators.

Keywords

Automation, Outsourcing, Fairness of Lay-offs, Lay-offs, Fairness

JEL Categories: M12, 015, D23

Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2017). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. NBER Working Paper No. w23285. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2941263

  • Autor, D., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-1597.

  • Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279-1333.

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. MA.: Digital Frontier Press Lexington.

  • Budros, A. (1999). A conceptual framework for analyzing why organizations downsize. Organization Science, 10(1), 69-82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.69

  • Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2013). Manufacturing decline, housing booms, and non-employment. Tech. Rep., NBER Working Paper No. 18949, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425-434. Retrieved from https:// journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014662168801200410

  • De Winter, J. C. F., & Dodou, D. (2010). Five-point likert items: T test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15(11).

  • Eschner, K. (2016, December 1). One hundred and three years ago today, Henry Ford introduced the assembly line: His workers hated it. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/one-hundred-and-three-years-ago-today-henryfordintroduced-assembly-line-his-workers-hated-it-180961267/

  • Global Sourcing Association. (2015). The public perception of outsourcing. Retrieved from http://www.gsa-uk.com/files/129.pdf

  • Goos, M., & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and lovely jobs: The rising polarization of work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 118-133.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

  • Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. E. (2012). The trend is the cycle: Job polarization and jobless recoveries. Tech. Rep., NBER Working Paper No. 18334, National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986b). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1806070

  • Keynes, J. M. (1933). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren (1930). Essays in Persuasion, 358-373.

  • Kim, J. (2018, December 12). Increasing capabilities or decreasing cost: Fairness perceptions of job displacement due to automation and outsourcing (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, California).

  • Knight, W. (2017, November 6). Is technology about to decimate white-collar work? MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609337/istechnology-about -to-decimate-white-collar-work/

  • Konow, J. (2001). Fair and square: The four sides of distributive justice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46(2), 137-164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 2681(01)00194-9

  • Konow, J. (2005). Blind spots: The effects of information and stakes on fairness bias and dispersion. Social Justice Research, 18(4), 349-390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211- 005-8566-6

  • MGI. (2017). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.

  • MGI. (2011). An economy that works: Job creation and America’s future (Technical Report). McKinsey Global Institute.

  • Muro, M., Maxim, R., & Whiton, J. (2019). Automation and artificial intelligence: How machines are affecting people and places. Metropoliton Policy Program – Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019.01_BrookingsMetro_Automation-AI_Report_Muro-Maxim-Whiton-FINAL-version.pdf

  • Nègre, E., Verdier, M.-A., Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2017). Disclosure strategies and investor reactions to downsizing announcements: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 239-257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.03.003

  • Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 15, 625-632.

  • Richard, F. D., Bond Jr, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331-363.

  • Sullivan, G. M., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ., 5, 541-542.

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.

  • Tyson, L., & Spence, M. (2017). Exploring the effects of technology on income and wealth inequality. In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong, & M. Steinbaum (Eds.), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality. Harvard University Press.


Abstract Views: 102

PDF Views: 0




  • Job Loss due to Automation Technologies: Perceptions of Fairness in the Information Technology Sector of India

Abstract Views: 102  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Gaurav Shetty
Department of Professional Studies, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract


The present study, addresses a research question on the perception of fairness of job losses due to automation technologies amongst general stakeholders. Jennifer Kim (2018) has shown that job displacement due to automation is perceived to be fairer in the United States when compared to outsourcing. The study by Jennifer Kim (2018) is replicated in this study on a sample drawn from the population of the Indian labour force, limiting it to the millennials and the IT industry. The results indicated that all job displacement is perceived to be unfair, despite the motive behind it. This is contrary to the results obtained from the sample from the United States. Also, there was no statistically significant difference between the perception of fairness towards the job displacement due to automation and outsourcing. Though there was no direct effect of the motive behind the job displacement/lay-off on the perception of fairness, it was found that there were significant indirect effects from the identified 4 mediators.

Keywords


Automation, Outsourcing, Fairness of Lay-offs, Lay-offs, Fairness

JEL Categories: M12, 015, D23


References