OPUS: HR Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of the Modificative Role of Human Capital on Adoption, Agility and Technology Diffusion as Mediators for Achieving an Optimal Change Management


Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Professor, Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, Islamic Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study is carried out with the aim of investigating the deterministic role of human capital for enhancing adoption and agility in the diffusion process of a new technology in order to implement technological changes satisfactorily. This causal relationship is carried outbased on five variables; human capital, adoption, agility, technology diffusion and change management measured through five questionnaires with 71 statements distributed among 432 IT employees in Pune-India. The collected data are analyzed through IBM SPSS 23, LISREL 8.5 and Mplus 6.12. However, the data analysis shows that there is a positive relationship between human capital, adoption, agility and technology diffusion as predictor variables with change management as a criterion variable, the interaction of adoption, agility and technology diffusion is not significant to support the proposed model of this study. This is while, human capital as the main independent variable could be placed in two modified models to examine the mediating roles of adoption and agility for a satisfactory change management in one model as well as the mediating role of technology diffusion in another model. It can be concluded that employees’ human capital as a main independent variable can enhance employees’ adoption and agility in technology diffusion to proceed a satisfactory technological change management. In other words, human capital is recognized as an essential capability in proceeding technological changes.

Keywords

Human Capital, Adoption, Agility, Technology Diffusion, Technological Change Management.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Andresen, K., & Gronau, N. (2006). Managing change – Determining the adaptability of information systems. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), July 6-7, Costa Blanca, Alicante, Spain.

  • Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1-19.

  • Bartel, A. P., & Lichtenberg, F. R. (1987). The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 1-11.

  • Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5), 215-227.

  • Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (2005). Human capital and technology diffusion. Chapter 13 in Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1, Part A, 935-966.

  • Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.

  • Chari, V. V., & Hopenhayn, H. (1987). Vintage human capital, growth, and the diffusion of new technology. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department. Working Paper 375.

  • Chari, V. V., & Hopenhayn, H. (1991). Vintage human capital, growth, and diffusion of new technology. The Journal of Political Economy, 99(6), 1142-1165.

  • Comin, D., & Hobijn, B. (2009). The CHAT data set. Harvard Business School and NBER Working Paper 10035.

  • Comin, D., Dmitriev, M. & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012). The spatial diffusionnof technology. CEPR Discussion Paper 9208 and NBER Working Paper 18534.

  • Comin, D., & Mestieri, M. (2014). Technology diffusion: Measurement, causes and consequences. Chapter 02 in Handbook of Economic Growth, 2, 565-622.

  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2008). Organization development and change (9th ed.). South-Western: Cengage Learning. ISBN 13: 978-0-324-42138-5

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, Minneapolis (MN), 13(3), 319-339.

  • DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.

  • Dove, R. (2005). Agile Enterprise cornerstone: Knowledge, values and response ability. In R. L. Baskerville, L. Mathiassen, J. Pries-Heje, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion. International Working Conference, 313-330, U.S.A.: Springer. ISBN-10: (eBook) 0-387-25590-7

  • Dunlop-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., Marion, T. J., & Friar, J. H. (2011). The role of technology agility on business processes and organizational agilities. IEEE International Technology Management Conference. doi:10.1109/ITMC.2011.5995930

  • Fichman, R. G. (1992). Information technology diffusion: A review of empirical research. International Conference on Information Systems, 195-206.

  • Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1993). Toward a theory of the adoption and diffusion of software process innovations. IFIP TC8 Working Group Conference Proceedings, Champion, PA, Levine, L. (Ed.), Elsevier Science Publications, New York, 23-31.

  • Goldman, S., Nagel, R., & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.

  • Gosh, S. M., Sharma, H. R., & Mohabay, V. (2011). Software change management – Technological dimension. International Journal of Smart Home, 5(2), 29-36.

  • Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Adaptive enterprise: Creating and leading sense- and- respond organizations. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 9780875848747 Hall, B. H., & Khan, B. (2002). Adoption of new technology. New Economy Handbook.

  • Kandt, R. K. (2002). Organizational change management principles and practices. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA. Retrieved from http://trs-new.jpl.nasa.gov/dspace/handle/2014/10570

  • Kredler, M. (2008). Experience vs. obsolescence: A vintage-Human-Capital Model. MPRA Paper No. 10200: New York. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10200/

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

  • Lin, Z., & Hui, C. (1997). Adapting to the changing environment: A theoretical comparison of decision making proficiency of lean and mass organization systems. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 3(2), 113-142.

  • Lyytinen, K., & Rose, G. M. (2004). How agile is agile enough? Towards a theory of agility in software development. Case Western Reserve University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 4(10). ISSN 1535-6078. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/4-10

  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.

  • Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569-600.

  • Mathiassen, L., & Pries-Heje, J. (2006). Business agility and diffusion of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 116-119.

  • Messinis, G., & Ahmed, A. D. (2008). Valuable skills, human capital and technology diffusion. Working Paper No. 38, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University.

  • Meymandpour, R., & Pawar, P. (2018). A comparison between fresh and old employees’ adoption and agility in technological changes. OPUS, 9(1), 1-15.

  • Pawar, P., & Meymandpour, R. (2017). An exploration of enhancing adoption and agility in technological changes. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 6(3), 15-20.

  • Popper, S. W. (2003). Technological change and the challenges for 21st century governance. In A. H. Teich, S. D. Nelson, S. J. Lita & A. E. Hunt (Eds.), AAAS science and Technology policy yearbook. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

  • Pryor, M. G., Taneja, S., Humphreys, J., Anderson, D., & Singleton, L. (2008). Challenges facing change management theories and research. Delhi Business Review, 1-20.

  • Qin, R., & Nembhard, D. A. (2010). Workforce agility for stochastically diffused conditions - A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2), 324-334.

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press, Macmillan Publishing: New York. ISBN: 0-02-926650-5

  • Rosenberg, N. (1972). Factors affecting the diffusion of technology. Explorations in Economic History, 10(1), 3-33. Reprinted in Rosenberg, N. (1976), Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-212.

  • Schütz, F., Huenges, E., Spalek, A., Bruhn, D., Pérez, P., & De Gregorio, M. (2013). Employment study: Solutions on lack of skilled workers in the geothermal sector and results of the questionnaires. Co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European Union. Retrieved from http://gfzpublic.gfzpotsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:376373:5/component/escidoc:376372/Sch%C3%BCtz%20et%20al.%20GEOELEC_Employment%20study.pdf

  • Sharabati, A. A. A., Naji Jawad, S., & Bontis, N. (2010). Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan. Management Decision, 48(1), 105-131.

  • Siddiqui, J., & Rahman, Z. (2012). Can IT/IS synergy with agility counter the productivity paradox? A perspective from existing literature. Journal of Engineering, Computers & Applied Sciences (JEC&AS), 1(3), 25-32.

  • Song, X. (2009). Why do change management strategies fail? Illustrations with case studies. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(1), 6-15.

  • Sonnenwald, D. H., Maglaughlin, K. L., & Whitton, M. C. (2001). Using innovation diffusion theory to guide collaboration technology evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Workshop on Enabling Technologies, Work in Progress, Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (pp. 114-119). WETICE, Cambridge, United States: IEEE Computer Society. ISBN: 0769512690

  • Stohr, E. A., & Zhao, J. L. (1997). A technology adaptation model for business process automation. Proceedings of the 30th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 405-414.

  • Strang, D., & Soule, S.A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265-290.

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.14

  • The Research Advisors. (2006). Sample size table. Retrieved from https://www.research-advisors.com/tools/SampleSize.htm

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-581.

  • West, D., & Grant, T. (2010). Agile development: Mainstream adoption has changed agility – Trends in real-world adoption of agile methods. For Application Development and Program Management Professional (pp. 1-20). Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.

  • Yaghoubi, N. M., & Rahat Dahmardeh, M. (2011). Knowledge management; critical success factor in organizational agility. American Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 2(3), 272-277.

  • Zhang, D. Z. (2011). Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies - Case studies of an agility taxonomy. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 303-312.


Abstract Views: 286

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study of the Modificative Role of Human Capital on Adoption, Agility and Technology Diffusion as Mediators for Achieving an Optimal Change Management

Abstract Views: 286  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rahil Meymandpour
Ph.D. Student, Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Prafulla Pawar
Professor, Department of Management Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Zahra Bagheri
Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


This study is carried out with the aim of investigating the deterministic role of human capital for enhancing adoption and agility in the diffusion process of a new technology in order to implement technological changes satisfactorily. This causal relationship is carried outbased on five variables; human capital, adoption, agility, technology diffusion and change management measured through five questionnaires with 71 statements distributed among 432 IT employees in Pune-India. The collected data are analyzed through IBM SPSS 23, LISREL 8.5 and Mplus 6.12. However, the data analysis shows that there is a positive relationship between human capital, adoption, agility and technology diffusion as predictor variables with change management as a criterion variable, the interaction of adoption, agility and technology diffusion is not significant to support the proposed model of this study. This is while, human capital as the main independent variable could be placed in two modified models to examine the mediating roles of adoption and agility for a satisfactory change management in one model as well as the mediating role of technology diffusion in another model. It can be concluded that employees’ human capital as a main independent variable can enhance employees’ adoption and agility in technology diffusion to proceed a satisfactory technological change management. In other words, human capital is recognized as an essential capability in proceeding technological changes.

Keywords


Human Capital, Adoption, Agility, Technology Diffusion, Technological Change Management.

References