Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effects of CSR Focused HRM on Employees' Satisfaction:A Study of Indian Organisations


Affiliations
1 Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential effects of various components of CSR focused HRM on employees' satisfaction towards their job. Primary data based on 563 respondents from 204 organisations operating in India have been analysed to test the stated hypotheses. Using regression analysis, this study has revealed that adoption of CSR focused HRM in form of legal compliance HRM and employee-oriented HRM leads to increased job satisfaction among employees working in organisations operating in India. No such relationship has been detected for other CSR focused HRM components i.e. general CSR facilitation HRM and general CSR conduct. The implications for HR practitioners and organisations are also discussed.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility, Employees’ Satisfaction, India, CSR Focused HRM.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435.
  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociological Methods and Research, 28(2), 186-208.
  • Baptiste, N. R. (2008). Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: A new dimension for HRM. Management Decision, 46(2), 284-309.
  • Bardoel, E. A., DeCieri, H., & Mayson, S. (2008). Bridging the research-practice gap: Developing a measurement framework for work-life initiatives. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(3), 239-258.
  • Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sense making. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122-136.
  • Batt, R. (2002). Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 587-597.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life,Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R.T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach (2nded.). Duxbury, Belmont, CA.
  • Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., & Wang Q. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 915-934.
  • Buciuniene, I., & Kazlauskaite, R. (2012). The linkage between HRM, CSR and performance outcomes. Baltic Journal of Management, 7(1), 5-24.
  • Celma, D., Martinez-Garcia, E., & Germa.C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in human resource management: an analysis of common practices and their determinants in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(2), 82-99.
  • Choi, J., & Lee, K. (2013). Effects of employees’ perceptions on the relationship between HR practices and fi rm performance for Korean firms. Personnel Review, 42(5), 573-594.
  • Cohen, E. (2010). CSR for HR: A necessary partnership for advancing responsible business ethics. Greenleaf, Sheffi eld, UK.
  • Davies, I., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in small-and medium-sizeenterprises: Investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(2), 126-139.
  • D’Netto, B., & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Human resource practices and workforce diversity: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 530-547.
  • Deshpande, S. P. (1996). The impact of ethical climate types on facets of job satisfaction, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 655-660.
  • Elci, M., & Alpkan, L. (2009). The impact of perceived organizational support on work satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 297-311.
  • European Commission. (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
  • Freeman, R. E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschriftfuer Wirts chafts-und Unternehmensethik,, 5(3), 228-241.
  • Gond, J., El-Akremi, A., Igalens, J., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influence on employees, No. 54- ICCSR Research Paper Series - ISSN 1479-5124 International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK, 1-46.
  • Green, K. W., Wu, C., Whitten, D., & Medlin, B. (2006). The impact of strategic human resource management on fi rm performance and HR professionals’ work attitude and work performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(4), 559-579.
  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261-278.
  • Guest, D. (1999). Human resource management: The workers’ verdict. Human Resource Management Journal, 9(3), 5-25.
  • Gupta, A. D., & Gupta, A. D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in India: Towards a sane society, Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 209-216.
  • Gurbuz, S. (2009). The effect of high performance HR practices on employees’ job satisfaction. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business Administration, 38(2), 110-123.
  • Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. C., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Hannah, D., & Iverson, R. (2004). Employment relationships in context: Implications for policy and practice, In J. Coyle-Shapiro, L. Shore, S. Taylor & L. Tetrick (Eds.), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 332-350), Oxford University Press,Oxford.
  • Jenkins, R. (2005). Globalization, corporate social responsibility and poverty. International Affairs, 81(3), 525-540.
  • Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407.
  • Kolr, A., & Tulder, R. V. (2002). Child labor and multinational conduct: a comparison of international business and stakeholder codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 291-301.
  • Kundu, S. C., & Gahlawat, N. In press, (2014). Effects of employee retention practices on perceived firm and innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Learning.
  • Kundu, S. C., & Malhan, D. (2009). HRM practices in insurance companies: a study of Indian and multinational companies. Managing Global Transitions, 7(2), 191-215.
  • Kundu, S. C., & Vora, J. A. (2004). Creating a talented workforce for delivering service quality. Human Resource Planning, 27(2), 40-51.
  • Manroop, L. (2014). Human resource systems and competitive advantage: an ethical climate perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, doi: 10.1111/beer.12069.
  • Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. L. (2006). Ethics and strategic human resource management, In J.R. Deckop (Ed.), Human Resource Management Ethics (pp. 3-25), Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.
  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3), 296-319.
  • Shen, J., & Zhu, C. J. (2011). Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3020-3035.
  • Shen, J., Chanda, A., D’Netto, B., & Monga, M. (2009). Managing diversity through human resources: An international perspective and conceptual framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(2), 235-251.
  • Tett, R. T., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
  • Valentine, S., & Barnett T., (2003). Ethics code awareness, perceived ethical values, and organizational commitment. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 23, 359-367.
  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics,77(2), 159-172.
  • Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholders management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426-452.
  • Whitman, D. S., Van Roddy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Satisfaction, citizenship behaviors, and performance in work units: A meta-analysis of collective construct relations. Personnel Psychology, 63(1), 41-81.
  • Winstanley, D., Woodall, J., & Heery, E. (1996). Business ethics and human resource management themes and issues. Personnel Review, 25(6), 5-12.

Abstract Views: 296

PDF Views: 0




  • Effects of CSR Focused HRM on Employees' Satisfaction:A Study of Indian Organisations

Abstract Views: 296  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Subhash C. Kundu
Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India
Neha Gahlawat
Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar, Haryana, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential effects of various components of CSR focused HRM on employees' satisfaction towards their job. Primary data based on 563 respondents from 204 organisations operating in India have been analysed to test the stated hypotheses. Using regression analysis, this study has revealed that adoption of CSR focused HRM in form of legal compliance HRM and employee-oriented HRM leads to increased job satisfaction among employees working in organisations operating in India. No such relationship has been detected for other CSR focused HRM components i.e. general CSR facilitation HRM and general CSR conduct. The implications for HR practitioners and organisations are also discussed.

Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility, Employees’ Satisfaction, India, CSR Focused HRM.

References