Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee Turnover: A Factorial Study of IT Industry


Affiliations
1 IMT Nagpur, Nagpur, India
2 Projects, Heath Services, CSC, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Change is inevitable and it affects all. Changes in organisations are visible across areas and levels. Change at times can yield dividends and many times proves detrimental to organisations. One area change can take place is the nature of workforce and is visible in form of employee turnover. This aspect of workforce can be a cause for concern if it goes beyond the limit. Employee turnover has most severely affected, Information Technology, as it is growing rapidly and is dominated by knowledge workers. These knowledge workers are demanding, and their expectations from life are distinct from workers engaged in other sectors. They are restless and are constantly on the move, looking for newer avenues. Retaining them is difficult for employers. In order to retain them, it becomes imperative to identify aspects (feature) of organisation this set of employees look before exiting. The present study is exploratory in nature and aims at identifying features of organisation which the employees in IT sector consider, while exiting their positions. The study reveals that appraisal, training, openness, and flexibility are important features which employees consider while leaving the organisation.

Keywords

Talent Retention, IT Industry
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: the Real Bottom Line. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), pp. 333-42.

  • Abdul, A. Y. (1999). Performance Appraisal: Concepts and Applications. Kuala Lumpur: Sinaran Bross.

  • Armour, S. (2000). Merging Companies Act to keep valuable employees. USA Today, November 24, section B.

  • Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance Management: The New Realistic. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

  • Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989). Content, Causes and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory Based Measure and Substantive Test. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), pp. 803-829.

  • Bedeian, A. G., Kemery, E. R., & Pizzolatto, A. B. (1991). Career Commitment and Expected Utility of Present Job as Predictors of Turnover Intentions and Turnover Behavior. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 39(3), pp. 331-343.

  • Bedeian, A. G., & Armenakis, A. A. (1981). A Path- Analytic Study of the Consequences of Role Confl ict and Ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), pp. 417-424.

  • Bliss, W. G. (2004). Cost of Employee Turnover. Retrieved from http:// www.isquare.com/turnover.cfm (accessed on September 18, 2004).

  • Branham, L. F. (2000). Keeping the People Who Keep You in Business: 24 Ways to Hang on to Your Most Valuable Talent. AMACOM.

  • Chaturvedi, A. (1987). Achieving Harmonious Industrials Relations: Successful Experiments and Experiences. Pune: The Time Research Foundation.

  • Cole, D. W. (1981). Professional Suicide: A Survival Kit for You and Your Job. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

  • Cooke, W. N. (1992). Product Quality Improvement through Employee Participation: The Effects of Unionization and Joint Union-Management Administration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46(1), pp. 119-134.

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), pp. 500-507.

  • Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and Consequences of Justice Perceptions in Performance Appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4), pp. 555-578.

  • Ghiselli, E. E. (1971). Explorations in Managerial Talent. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

  • Goldstein, I. L. (1991). Training in Work Organization. In M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (ed.), Handbook of Individual and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

  • Holbrook, R. L. Jr. (2002). Contact Points and Flash Points: Conceptualizing the Use of Justice Mechanisms in the Performance Appraisal Interview. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), pp. 101-123.

  • Jones, C. A., & Crandall, W. R. (1991). Determining the Sources of Voluntary Employee Turnover. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 56(2), pp. 16-20.

  • Kalliath, T.J., & Beck, A. (2001). Is the path to burnout and turnover paved by a lack of supervisory support: A structural equations Test. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30, 72-78

  • Kelley, M. R., & Harrison, B. (1992). Unions, Technology and Labour-Management Cooperation. In Mishel, L. and Voos, P. (Eds.). Unions and Economic Competitiveness (pp. 247-286). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

  • Kundu, S. C. (2003). Workforce Diversity Status: A Study of Employees’ Reaction. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(4), pp. 215-226.

  • Liff, S. (1996). Two routes to managing diversity: individual differences or social groupcharacteristics. Employee Relations. 19(1), pp. 11-26

  • Lofquist, L., & Dawis, R. (1969). Adjustment to Work. New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts.

  • London, M. (1995). Self and Interpersonal Insight: How People Learn about Themselves and Others in Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Longenecker, C. (1997). Why Managerial Performance Appraisals are Ineffective: Causes and Lessons. Career Development International, 2(5), pp. 212-218.

  • Magner, N., Welker, R., & Johnson, G. (1996). The Interactive Effects of Participation and Outcome Favourability on Turnover Intentions and Evaluations of Supervisors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(2), pp. 135-143.

  • McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organisational Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), pp. 626-637.

  • Mello, J. A. (2002). Strategic Human Resource Management. Ohio: Thomson Learning.

  • Mobley, W. H., Griffeth, R. W., Hand, H. H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and Conceptual Analysis of the Employee Turnover Process. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), pp. 493-522.

  • Moss, B. (2000). Chain of Loyalty. SDM: Security Distributing and Marketing, 30(15), pp. 79.

  • Okechuku, C. (1994). The Relationship of Six Managerial Characteristics to the Assessment of Managerial Effectiveness in Canada, Hong Kong and People’s Republic of China. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(1), pp. 79-87.

  • Orpen, C. (1999). The Infl uence of the Training Environment on Trainee Motivation and Perceived Training Quality. International Journal of Training Development, 3(1), pp. 34-42.

  • Ostroff, C. (1993). The Effects of Climate and Personal Infl uences on Individual Behavior and Attitudes in Organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(1), pp. 56-90.

  • Paul, M. T. (1983). Managerial Effectiveness and Motivation, Leadership, Personality and Organizational Climate. Unpublished Thesis: University of Madras.

  • Price, J. L. (1977). The Study of Turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), pp. 121-139.

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New Hire Perceptions of their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 11(5), pp. 389-400.

  • Schneider, B. (1975). Organisational Climate: An Essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp. 447-479.

  • Schuler, R. S. (1980). Defi nition and Conceptualisation of Stress in Organisations. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 25, pp. 184-215.

  • Sheridan, J. E., & Abelson, M.A. (1983). Cusp Catastrophe Model of Employee Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 26(3), pp. 418-36.

  • St. Armour, D. (2000). Ten Ways to Retain High Performance Employees. Canadian Manager, 25(2), pp. 21.

  • Robbins, S. P., DeCenzo, D. A., Kotze, R. S., & Stewart, E. B. (2001). Fundamentals of Management: Essential Concepts and Applications, (4thEd). Toronto, Canada. Taylor, S. (1998). Employee Resourcing. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

  • Tornow, W. W. (1988). Contract Re-Design. Personnel Administrator, 33, pp. 97-107.

  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Hite, J. P. (1995). Choice of Employee-Organization Relationship Infl uence External and Internal Organizational Factors. In G.R. Fersis (eds.). Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, pp. 117-151. JAI Press: Greenwich, CT.

  • Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative Approaches to the Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), pp. 1089-1121.

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), pp. 82-11.

  • Weaver, J. J. (1994). Want customer satisfaction? Satisfy Your Employees First. HR Magazine, pp. 110, 112.

  • Woods, R. H. (1995). Managing Hospitality Human Resources. Educational Institute of the American Hotel and Motel Association. East Lansing, MI.

  • Woods, R. H., Heck, H., & Sciarini, M. (1998). Turnover and Diversity in the Lodging Industry. Washington, DC: American Hotel Foundation.

  • Woods, R. H., & Macaulay, J. F. (1989). Rx for Turnover: Retention Programs that Work. The Cornell Hotel, Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 30(1), pp. 79-90.

  • Yong, A. K. B. (1996). Malaysian Human Resource Management. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Institute of Management.

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp. 682-696.


Abstract Views: 536

PDF Views: 0




  • Employee Turnover: A Factorial Study of IT Industry

Abstract Views: 536  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Vinit Singh Chauhan
IMT Nagpur, Nagpur, India
Druvesh Patel
Projects, Heath Services, CSC, United States

Abstract


Change is inevitable and it affects all. Changes in organisations are visible across areas and levels. Change at times can yield dividends and many times proves detrimental to organisations. One area change can take place is the nature of workforce and is visible in form of employee turnover. This aspect of workforce can be a cause for concern if it goes beyond the limit. Employee turnover has most severely affected, Information Technology, as it is growing rapidly and is dominated by knowledge workers. These knowledge workers are demanding, and their expectations from life are distinct from workers engaged in other sectors. They are restless and are constantly on the move, looking for newer avenues. Retaining them is difficult for employers. In order to retain them, it becomes imperative to identify aspects (feature) of organisation this set of employees look before exiting. The present study is exploratory in nature and aims at identifying features of organisation which the employees in IT sector consider, while exiting their positions. The study reveals that appraisal, training, openness, and flexibility are important features which employees consider while leaving the organisation.

Keywords


Talent Retention, IT Industry

References