Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development of a Causal Framework Linking Work Values, Perceived Organisational Support, and Job Attitudes


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Construction Management and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study is focused at Indian Generation Y employees who comprise almost half of the Indian working population and are growing at a rapid pace. Preliminary studies and efforts related to deciphering these young employees have classified them as the most demanding population with high expectations from the work environment in terms of better on-site support facilities and norms for work-life balance. The research proposes a conceptual model that seeks to link outlook and approaches of this generation based on their work values (extrinsic, intrinsic, status-related, freedom-related, and social related) to their expectations from organisations (perceived organisational support or POS) in terms of organisational support and its causal relationship with job attitudes like affective commitment, felt obligation, job satisfaction, and turnover intention through outlining relative propositions and giving an understanding about the rationale and significance of the proposed conceptual model.

Keywords

Generation, India, Job Satisfaction, Perceived Organisational Support, Work Values.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support & police performance, The moderating influence of socio emotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 288-297.

  • Bijapurkar, R. (2007). Winning in the Indian market: Understanding the transformation of consumer India. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: J. Wiley.

  • Caesens, G., Marique, G., Hanin, D., & Stinglhamber, F. (2016). The relationship between perceived organizational support and proactive behaviour directed towards the organization. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 398-411.

  • Cennamo, D., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes & person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891-906.

  • Chen, Y. (2007). Relationships among service orientation, job satisfaction, & organizational commitment in the international tourist hotel industry. Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(2), 71-82.

  • Chen, P. J., & Choi, Y. (2008). Generational differences in work values, a study of hospitality management, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(6), 595-615.

  • Cohen, A. (1996). On the discriminant validity of the meyer & allen measures of organizational commitment, How does it fit with the work commitment construct? Educational & Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 494-504.

  • Cohen, S., & Bailey, D. (1997). What makes teams work, group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.

  • Dose, J. J. (1997). Work values. An integrative framework & illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 70(3), 219-240.

  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.

  • Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997). perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment & job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support & employee diligence, commitment & innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.

  • Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination & intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(5), 1026-1040.

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I,. & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived Supervisor Support, Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support & Employee Retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565-573.

  • Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values, A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 379-389.

  • Elizur, D., (1996). Work values & commitment, International Journal of Manpower, 71(1), 25-30.

  • Erickson, T. (2009). Generational differences between Indian and the U.S. Retrieved from, https://hbr.org/2009/02/global-generations-focus-on-in

  • Fazio, J., Gong, B., Sims, R., & Yurova, Y. (2017). The role of affective commitment in the relationship between social support and turnover intention. Management Decision, 55(3).

  • Ghosh, R., & Chaudhari, S. (2009). Intergenerational differences in individualism/collectivism orientations: implications for outlook towards HRD/HRM practices in India and the United States. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 23(4), 5-21.

  • Harley, B. (1999). The myth of empowerment, Work organisation, hierarchy & employee outcomes in contemporary Australian workplaces. Work, Employment & Society, 13(1), 41-66.

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1956). The Motivation to work. New York: Wily publications.

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 0149206315575554.

  • Judge, T. A., & Bretz, J. D. Jr. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 261-271.

  • Jurkiewicz C.E. (2000). Generation X & the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29, 55-74.

  • Jurkiewicz C. E., & Brown R.G. (1998). GenXers vs. boomers vs matures, generational comparisons of public employee motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 18, 18-37.

  • Jorgensen, B. (2005). Attract, retain and innovate: workforce policy architecture adapted to modern conditions. Foresight, 7(5), 21-31.

  • Kildron, A. (1978). Work values & organizational commitment. Academy of management Journals, 21(1), 119-128.

  • Kilmann, R. H. (1981). Toward a unique/useful value of interpersonal behavior, A critical review of literature on value. Psychological Reports, 48, 939-959.

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E.A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 370-390.

  • Lyons, S. (2003). An exploration of generational values in life & at work. Unpublished PhD thesis. Carleton University, Toronto, Canada.

  • Lyons, S. (2004). An exploration of generational values in life & at work. Dissertation Abstracts International, 3462A (UMI No. AATNQ94206).

  • Macky, K., Gardner, D., & Forsyth, S. (2008). Generational differences at work, introduction & overview. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 857-861.

  • Maertz, C., & Griffeth, R. (2004). Eight motivational forces & voluntary turnover, A theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 667-683.

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta: Analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.

  • McGuire, D., Todnem R. B., & Hutchings, K. (2007). Towards a model of human resource solutions for achieving intergenerational interaction in organisations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(8), 592-608.

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 64-98.

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. J., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500.

  • Parker, B., & Cusmir, L. (1990). A generational & sex-based view of managerial work values. Psychological Republic, 66, 947-950.

  • Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work, & personal factors in employee turnover & absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151-176.

  • Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulin, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, & turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.

  • Putti, J. M., Aryee, S., & Liang, T. K. (1989). Work vales & organizational commitment, a study in the Asian context. Human Relations, 42, 275-288.

  • Rai, S. (2011). Engagement, social media & gen Y, connecting the dots. Asian Journal of Management Research, 2(1), 637-650.

  • Rajesh, S., & Ekambaram, K. (2014). Generational diversity in the Indian workforce: An Exploratory study. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 2(7), 54-64.

  • Rani, N., & Samuel, A. (2016). A study on generational differences in work values and person-organization fit and its effect on turnover intention of Generation Y in India. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1695-1719. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0249

  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support, a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.

  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization, The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825-836.

  • Rhodes S. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes & behavior, a review & conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 328-367.

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes & Values, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • Roongrerngsuke, S. (2010). Attracting and retaining multigenerational workforce in China, India and Thailand, SHRM Annual Conference, 2010 presentation. Retrieved on 22nd May 2015 from, http://sapphire.shrm.org/annualconferenceondemand/2010-annual-conference/6292010-attracting-retaining-multigenerational-workforce-china-india-thailand.aspx.

  • Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations, Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, & employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.

  • Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363-382.

  • Sommers, M. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover & absenteeism, an examination of direct & interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49-58.

  • Srinivasan, V. (2012). Multi generations in the workforce: Building Collaborations. IIMB Management Review, 24(1), 48-66.

  • Super, D. (1962). The structure of work values in relation to status, achievement, interests, & adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(4), 231-239.

  • Super, D. (1973). The work values inventory in Zytowski, D. G. (ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Interest Measurement. Minneapolis (pp. 189-205), MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Stinglhamber, F., Caesens, G., Clark, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2016). 24. Perceived organizational support. Handbook of Employee Commitment, 333.

  • Taplin, I., & Winterton, J. (2007). The importance of management style in labor retention. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 27(1/2), 5-15.

  • Tett, R. P., & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention and turnover: path analyses based meta - analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-294.

  • Warr, P., Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of social work attitudes and aspects of psychological. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129-148.

  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support & leader-member exchange, A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.

  • Winter, R. P., & Jackson, B. A. (2016). Work values preferences of Generation Y: performance relationship insights in the Australian Public Service. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(17), 1997-2015.

  • Gen Y & Global Workforce Report http://www.haworth-europe.com/en/content/download/8985/545674/file/Oxygenz-Report_2010_EN.pdf

  • CRISIL Skilling India Report, (2010) www.crisil.com/pdf/corporate/skilling-india_nov10.pdf

  • CRISIL Insight Report - Employment (2014) https://www.crisil.com/pdf/research/CRISIL_Research_Insight_Employment_Jan2014.pdf

  • Randstad Workmonitor -Wave I Report (2011) Randstad Workmonitor - Wave 3 Report (2015) https://www.randstad.com/press/research-reports/research-reports/

  • The Gen Y Imperative, IABC and Deloitte Global Survey, April 2008 http://www.emerginghealthleaders.ca/resources/Reynolds-GenY.pdf


Abstract Views: 346

PDF Views: 0




  • Development of a Causal Framework Linking Work Values, Perceived Organisational Support, and Job Attitudes

Abstract Views: 346  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Soumi Rai
National Institute of Construction Management and Research, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


The present study is focused at Indian Generation Y employees who comprise almost half of the Indian working population and are growing at a rapid pace. Preliminary studies and efforts related to deciphering these young employees have classified them as the most demanding population with high expectations from the work environment in terms of better on-site support facilities and norms for work-life balance. The research proposes a conceptual model that seeks to link outlook and approaches of this generation based on their work values (extrinsic, intrinsic, status-related, freedom-related, and social related) to their expectations from organisations (perceived organisational support or POS) in terms of organisational support and its causal relationship with job attitudes like affective commitment, felt obligation, job satisfaction, and turnover intention through outlining relative propositions and giving an understanding about the rationale and significance of the proposed conceptual model.

Keywords


Generation, India, Job Satisfaction, Perceived Organisational Support, Work Values.

References