Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Efficiency Issues in Supply Chain Management


Affiliations
1 Department of Supply Chain Management, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
2 Department of Business Administration, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper discusses the efficiency issues in purchasing, manufacturing, and transporting over various stages of a supply chain such as supplier selection, production, and distribution. To address the efficiency questions, we group the supply chain into six independent areas. Four of these, vendor management, scheduling, inventory management, and transportation, are related to the product flow, whereas network design and information sharing are non-flow related.

Keywords

Efficiency, Supply Chain Management.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aharon, B. T., Boaz, G., & Smirit, S. (2009). Robust multi-echelon multiperiod inventory control. European Journal of Operations Research, 199, 922-935.
  • Appadoo, S. S., Bhatt, S. K., & Bector, C. R. (2007). Possibility Supported TOPSIS model with Application to Vendor Selection Problem in Supply Chain management'. Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Appadoo, S. S., Bhatt, S. K., Bector, C. R., & Sharma, V. N. (2009). "(φ,λ) Mixed Strategy for Group Multi- Attribute TOPSIS model with Application to Supplier Selection Problem. Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference Niagara Falls, Canada.
  • Arunapuram, S., Mathur, K., & Solow, D. (2003). Vehicle Routing and Scheduling with Full Truckloads. Transportation Science, 37( 2), 170-182.
  • Bhatt, S. K. (1989). Equivalence of Various Linearization Algorithms fjor Linear Fractional programming, ZOR-Methods and Models of Operations Research. Physica-Verlag, Germany, 33, 39-43.
  • Bhatt, S. K., Bhatnagar, N., & Appadoo, S. S. (2009). 'Consumer Choice Model Via TOPSIS. Presented at the annual conference of the SJDM (the society for judgment and decision Making), Boston, USA, 21-23, 2009.
  • Bhatt, S. K., & Borgesa, R. (2005). Operations Research Models in Supply Chain Management. Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference, Toronto, Canada.
  • Bhatt, S. K., Duggan, B., & Rheault, M. (2004). Measuring Best Practices in Canadian Orchestras using Data Envelopment Analysis. Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.
  • Bhatt, S. K., P. Earl, E., Foropan, C., Larson, P., McLachlin, R., Morris, M., Prentice, B., Rosenbloom, E., & Tyrchniewicz, E. (2006). At the center of it all: SCM in a New Academic Department. Proceeding of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  • Bhatt, S. K., Orellana, C., & Jayaraman, S. (2009). ERP Implementation in a Window Manufacturing Company in Winnipeg, Canada, MBA Project, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
  • Breedam, A. V. (2001). Comparing descent heuristics and met heuristic for the Vehicle Routing Problem. Computers and Operations Research, 28, 289-315.
  • Brinkerhoff, R. O., & Dressler, D. E. (1990). Productivity measurement, a guide for manager and evaluators. Sage Publication, New Delhi.
  • Charnes, A, Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operation Research, 2, 429-444.
  • Cormican, K., & O'Sullivan, D. (2004). Auditing Best Practices for Effective product Innovation Management Technovation, 24, 819-829.
  • Davis, G., & Song, J. H. (2006). Biodegradable Packaging Based on Raw Materials from Crops and their Impact on Waste Management. Industrial Crops and Products, 23, 147-161.
  • Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of Crisis, MIT press.
  • Eilon, S. (1987). Definition and effect of productivity on corporate performance, Omega, 15, 389-393.
  • Farrell, M. J.(1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Science series A, 120, 253-281.
  • Fishman, C. (2006). The wal-mart effect. Penguin Press.
  • Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M., & Pagh, J. (1998). Supply Chain management: Implementation issues and Research opportunities. International Journal of logistic management, 9(2), 1-19.
  • Leender, R. M., & Blenkhorn, D. L. (1988). Reverse Marketing. Collier Macmillan Pub., London.
  • Leung, C. H., & Chan, S. W. (2009). A goal programming model for aggregate production planning with resource utilization constraint. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 56, 1053-1064.
  • Maarten, W. (2008). Efficiency and Effectiveness = Productivity. Retrieved from authorsden.com
  • Nickel, S., Puerto, J., & Rodriguez-Chia, A. M. (2003). An approach to location models involving sets as existing facilities. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28(4), 693-715.
  • Nydick, R. L., & Hill, R. P. (1992). Using AHP to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 31-6.
  • Proctor, S. J., Rowlingson, M., McArdle, L., Hassard, J., & Forrestor, P. (1994). Flexibility, Politics and Strategy: In defense of the model of flexible firms. Work Employment and Society, 8, 221-242.
  • Rastogi, P. N. (1988). Productivity, innovation, management and development. Sage Publications, New Delhi.
  • Sherman H. D.(1988). Service organization productivity management, Society of management accountants of Canada, Hamilton, Ont, Canada.
  • Silva, C.A., Sousa, J. M. C., Runkler, T. A., & Sa da Costa, J. M. G. (2009). Distributed supply chain management using ant colony optimization. European Journal of Operations Research, 199, 349-358.
  • Smimou, K., Bhatt, S.K., & Dahl, D.W. (2005). New product ideas screening decisions with approximate evaluation: an optimization approach. Fuzzy Economic Review, 10 (20), 45-57.
  • Sumanth, D.J.(1998). Total productivity management: A systematic and qualitative approach to compete in quality, price and time, St-Lucie Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
  • Thanassoulis, E. A., Boussofiane, R., & Dyson, G. (1996). A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as a tool for performance assessment, Omega, 24, 229-244.
  • Wang, E. T. G., Shih, S. P., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2008). The consistency among facilitating factors and erp implementation success: A holistic view of fit. The Journal of Systems and Software, 81, 1609-1621.
  • Weber, C. A., (1996). A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance. Supply Chain Management, 1(1), 28-30
  • Weber, C. A., & Current J. R. (1993). A multi-objective approach to vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 68, 173-84.
  • Weber, C. A., Current, J., & Desai, A. (2000). An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 90-98.
  • Yu, M. M., Ting, S. C., & Chen, M. C. (2009). Evaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications. In Press.
  • Zhou, H., & Benton Jr., W. C. (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1348-1365.

Abstract Views: 195

PDF Views: 3




  • Efficiency Issues in Supply Chain Management

Abstract Views: 195  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

S. K. Bhatt
Department of Supply Chain Management, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
C. R. Bector
Department of Business Administration, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
S. S. Appadoo
Department of Supply Chain Management, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Abstract


This paper discusses the efficiency issues in purchasing, manufacturing, and transporting over various stages of a supply chain such as supplier selection, production, and distribution. To address the efficiency questions, we group the supply chain into six independent areas. Four of these, vendor management, scheduling, inventory management, and transportation, are related to the product flow, whereas network design and information sharing are non-flow related.

Keywords


Efficiency, Supply Chain Management.

References