Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Green Logistics and Organisational Performance:Exploring Time-Based Competition as a Missing Link


Affiliations
1 Dalian Maritime University, China
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The main objective of this study was to provide insight into how an organisation’s decision to go green influences its performance in the logistics sector. This study advances a complex model by introducing time-based competition as a mediating variable between green logistics and organisational performance. The study considered a sample of 190 managers from logistics companies; thereafter, questionnaires were distributed. Data collected were analysed by employing the partial least square method of structural equation modelling. An analysis of the data indicates there are significant positive relationships between green logistics, organisational performance and time-based competition as well as between time-based competition and organisational performance. In addition, the intermediary role of time-based competition in the relationship is supported; thus, all hypotheses in this study were supported. These findings provide relevant information to managers and academicians in understanding the concept of green in the logistics sector, especially in this ever-changing and growing business environment.

Keywords

Green Logistics, Time-Based Competition, and Organisational Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdinnour-Helm, S. (2000). Time-based competition through better customer service. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 41(1), 24.
  • Aragón-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & García-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(1), 88-103.
  • Azzone, G., Masella, C., & Bertelè, U. (1991). Design of performance measures for time-based companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 11(3), 77-85.
  • Bag, S. (2013). Designing the green supply chain strategy for Indian manufacturing firm. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(1), 8.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  • Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
  • Banyte, J., & Raišyte, V. (2009). Global financial crisis: Reasons, effects and solutions. Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, Izmir.
  • Blackburn, J. D. (1991). The quick response movement in the apparel industry: A case study in time-compressing supply chains, In Blackburn, J. D. (ed.) (pp. 249-250), Time-Based Competition: The Next Battleground in American Manufacturing. McGraw Hill, Homewood.
  • Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Farukt, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174-189.
  • Carter, C. R., & Dresner, M. (2001). Purchasing’s role in environmental management: Cross-functional development of grounded theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 12-27.
  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387.
  • Cetindamar, D. (2001). The role of regulations in the diffusion of environment technologies: Micro and macro issues. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 186-193.
  • Cheng, J. H., Yeh, C. H., & Tu, C. W. (2008). Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 283-295.
  • Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2007). Multiple perspectives of performance measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), 266-282.
  • Droge, C., Jayaram, J., & Vickery, S. K. (2004). The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time-based performance and overall firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(6), 557-573.
  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Papadopoulos, T. (2017). Green supply chain management: Theoretical framework and further research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(1), 184-218.
  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., & Childe, S. J. (2015). Green supply chain management enablers: Mixed methods research. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 4, 72-88.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442-458.
  • Hart, O. (1995). Firms, contracts, and financial structure. Clarendon Press.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing (pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330-353.
  • Holmberg, S. (2000). A systems perspective on supply chain measurements. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(10), 847-868.
  • Hum, S. H., & Sim, H. H. (1996). Time-based competition: literature review and implications for modelling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(1), 75-90.
  • Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131-154.
  • Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016). Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1824-1833.
  • Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241-262.
  • Karpak, B., Kumcu, E., & Kasuganti, R. R. (2001). Purchasing materials in the supply chain: Managing a multi-objective task. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7(3), 209-216.
  • Kirby, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(4).
  • Klimov, R., & Merkuryev, Y. (2008). Simulation model for supply chain reliability evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(3), 300-311.
  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
  • Lebas, M. J. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1-3), 23-35.
  • McKinnon, A. (2010). Green logistics: The carbon agenda. Electronic Scientific Journal of Logistics, 6(1).
  • Menguc, B., & Ozanne, L. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430-438.
  • Miles, M. P., & Covin, J. G. (2000). Environmental marketing: A source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 299-311.
  • Moser, A. K. (2015). Thinking green, buying green? Drivers of pro-environmental purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(3), 167-175.
  • Murphy, P. R., & Poist, R. F. (2000). Green logistics strategies: An analysis of usage patterns. Transportation Journal, 5-16.
  • Narasimhan, R., & Jayaram, J. (1998). Causal linkages in supply chain management: An exploratory study of North American manufacturing firms. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 579-605.
  • Noyé, D. (2002). Manager les performances. Insep Editions.
  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2009). A closer look at ethical corporate marketing: Sustainability ratings as a means to deter greenwashing. Cahier de Recherche du DMSP, 383.
  • Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 467-480.
  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-68.
  • QuariguasiFrotaNeto, J., & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M. (2009). The environmental gains of remanufacturing: Evidence from the computer and mobile industry.
  • Raghuram, C., & Jayaraman, R. (2013). Reducing the carbon footprint in the supply chain. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(1).
  • Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.
  • Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598-605.
  • Robinson, D. R., & Wilcox, S. (2008). The greening of the supply chain. Logistics Management, 47(10).
  • Rodgers, W., & Pavlou, P. (2003). Developing a predictive model: A comparative study of the partial least squares vs maximum likelihood techniques. Riverside: Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside.
  • Roslender, R., & Hart, S. J. (2002). Integrating management accounting and marketing in the pursuit of competitive advantage: The case for strategic management accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(2), 255-277.
  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
  • Sapkauskiene, A., & Leitoniene, S. (2010). The concept of time-based competition in the context of management theory. Engineering Economics, 21(2).
  • Schmenner, R. W. (1988). The merit of making things fast. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 11.
  • Sharma, M. M. (2013). A study on the concept of green supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management Systems, 2(1).
  • Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.
  • Sheu, J. B., Chou, Y. H., & Hu, C. C. (2005). An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(4), 287-313.
  • Stalk, G. (1988). Time-the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review.
  • Stalk Jr, G., & Hout, T. M. (1990). Competing against time. Research-Technology Management, 33(2), 19-24.
  • Teixeira, A. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Latan, H., & De Oliveira, J. H. C. (2016). Green training and green supply chain management: Evidence from Brazilian firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 170-176.
  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Reader in Business and the Environment, 36, 81.
  • Wu, H. J., & Dunn, S. C. (1995). Environmentally responsible logistics systems. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(2), 20-38.
  • Wu, H. J., Dunn, S., & Forman, H. J. (2012). A study on green supply chain management practices among large global corporations. Journal of Supply Chain and Operations Management, 10(1), 182-194.
  • Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mavondo, F. T. (1999). Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Technovation, 19(8), 507-518.
  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355.
  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
  • Zikmund, W. (2000). G. (2000). Business research methods, 6.

Abstract Views: 198

PDF Views: 1




  • Green Logistics and Organisational Performance:Exploring Time-Based Competition as a Missing Link

Abstract Views: 198  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Charles Baah
Dalian Maritime University, China

Abstract


The main objective of this study was to provide insight into how an organisation’s decision to go green influences its performance in the logistics sector. This study advances a complex model by introducing time-based competition as a mediating variable between green logistics and organisational performance. The study considered a sample of 190 managers from logistics companies; thereafter, questionnaires were distributed. Data collected were analysed by employing the partial least square method of structural equation modelling. An analysis of the data indicates there are significant positive relationships between green logistics, organisational performance and time-based competition as well as between time-based competition and organisational performance. In addition, the intermediary role of time-based competition in the relationship is supported; thus, all hypotheses in this study were supported. These findings provide relevant information to managers and academicians in understanding the concept of green in the logistics sector, especially in this ever-changing and growing business environment.

Keywords


Green Logistics, Time-Based Competition, and Organisational Performance.

References