Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Cleft Lip and Palate Indices:A Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Cleft lip and palate are the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly which require orthodontist as a member of collaborative multidisciplinary team. Successful treatment of these children require thorough description of the disease process, classification system and planning of the treatment protocol. The aim of this study is to review the available literature of the indices used to assess the severity of malocclusion in cleft lip and palate patients. This overview can create better understanding regarding the uses, advantages, and disadvantages of different index systems. The literatures were searched by using electronic databases.

Keywords

Cleft Lip and Palate, Cross-bite, Index, Malocclusion, Yardstick.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: A review. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24:216–225.

  • Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009; 374:1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4

  • Vargervik K. Orthodontic management of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1981; 18:256–270.

  • Rani MS, Chikmagalur NS. Classification of cleft lip and palate- A review. Ann Essence Dent. 2011; 3(2):82–94. https://doi.org/10.5368/aedj.2011.3.2.4.1

  • Pruzansky S, Aduss H. Arch form and the deciduous occlusion in complete unilateral clefts. Cleft Palate J. 1964; 30:411–418.

  • Mattews D, Chir M, Broomhead I, Grossmann W, Goldin H. Early and late bone grafting in cases of cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1970; 23:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(70)80028-5

  • Huddart A, Bodenham RS. The evaluation of arch form and occlusion in unilateral cleft palate subjects. Cleft Palate J.1972; 9:194–209.

  • Mossey PA, Clark JD, Gray D. Preliminary investigation of a modified Huddart/Bodenham scoring system for assessment of maxillary arch constriction in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.3.251. PMid:12831214

  • Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJ, Bergland O, Semb G. The Goslon Yardstick: A new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24:314–322.

  • Friede H, Enemark H, Gunvor S, Gunnar P, Abyholm F, Bolund S, et al. Craniofacial and occlusal characteristics in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients from four scandinavian centres. J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991; 25:269–276. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319109020631

  • Atack NE, Hathorn IS, Semb G, Dowell T, Sandy JR. A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: Reproducibility and Validity. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 1997; 34(3):242–246. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0242_anifas_2.3.co_2. PMid:9167076

  • Ozawa TO, Shaw WC, Katsaros C, Kujipers-Jagatman AM, Hagberg C, Ronning E, et al. A new yardstick for rating dental arch relationship in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate - Craniofac J. 2011; 48(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-122. PMid:2050 0054

  • Bartzela T, Leenarts C, Bronkhorst E, Borstlap W, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-jagtman AM. Comparison of two scoring systems for evaluation of treatment outcome in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J. 2011; 48(4):455–461. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-208. PMid:20536374

  • Summers J. The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod. 1971; 59(6):552– 567. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90002-9

  • Agarwal A, Mathur R. An overview of orthodontic indices. World J Dent. 2012; 3(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1132

  • Tang E, Wei S. Recording and measuring malocclusion: A review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993; 103:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93 )70015-G

  • Gupta A, Shrestha RM. A review of orthodontic indices. Orthod J Nepal. 2014; 4(2):44–50. https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v4i2.13898

  • Oskouei SM. The Eurocran Index for grading dental arch relationship and palatal morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. University of Manchester (UK), Master of Science Thesis; 2007.

  • Alam MK, Kajii TS, Koshikawa-matsuno M, Sugawara-kato Y, Sato Y, Iida J. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting dental arch relationships in Japanese unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at Hokkaido University Hospital. Orthod waves. 2008; 67:45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2007.12.001

  • Atack N, Mars M, Sandy J. Study models of 5-year-old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/19.2.165. PMid:9183066

  • 21. Gray D, Mossey PA. Evaluation of a modified Huddart/ Bodenham scoring system for assessment of maxillary arch constriction in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27:507–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji019. PMid:16143699

  • Sanjida H, Mohammad KA, Imran AA. An overview of indices used to measure treatment effectiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate. Malayasian J Med Sci. 2015; 22(1):4–11.

  • Sabelis AJ, Kuijpers MAR, Nada RM, Chiu Y, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-jagtman AM, et al. Rating dental arch relationships and palatal morphology with the EUROCRAN index on three different formats of dental casts in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Clin Oral Invest. 2016; 20:943–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1595-0. PMid:26462656 PMCid:PMC4873539

  • Altalibi M, Saltaji H, Edwards R, Major PW, Flores-mir C. Systematic review indices to assess malocclusions in patients with cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 2013; 35(6):772–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt009. PMid:23504529

  • Bongaarts C, Kuijpers-Jagatman AM, Van’t Hof MA, Prahl-Andersen B. The effect of infant orthopedics on the occlusion of the deciduous dentition in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate - Craniofac J. 2004; 41(6):633–641. https://doi.org/10.1597/03-051.1. PMid:15516167


Abstract Views: 191

PDF Views: 0




  • Cleft Lip and Palate Indices:A Review

Abstract Views: 191  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anju Agrawal
Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal
Rabindra Man Shrestha
Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal
Praveen Mishra
Department of Orthodontics, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal

Abstract


Cleft lip and palate are the most common congenital craniofacial anomaly which require orthodontist as a member of collaborative multidisciplinary team. Successful treatment of these children require thorough description of the disease process, classification system and planning of the treatment protocol. The aim of this study is to review the available literature of the indices used to assess the severity of malocclusion in cleft lip and palate patients. This overview can create better understanding regarding the uses, advantages, and disadvantages of different index systems. The literatures were searched by using electronic databases.

Keywords


Cleft Lip and Palate, Cross-bite, Index, Malocclusion, Yardstick.

References