Journal of Network and Information Security

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Inflammation Detection in Cervical Cytology Images


Affiliations
1 Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology Kalady, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
2 Model Engineering College, Thrikkakara, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. If detected at a precancerous condition it is completely curable. Several screening methods are available and Pap smear test is a preliminary screening method. Hence an automatic detection method for cervical cancer will be preferred. Cervical Screening System is a computer assisted screening solution, where the digitized images of the PAP-Smear are analyzed and classified through advanced image processing and classification algorithms. The LBC slides are analyzed for the detection of normal and abnormal cells. But some slides will be inflammatory, that are neither normal nor abnormal, but existing systems categorize them as abnormal and will go for further review. The inflammatory slides should be identified and categorized as Inflammatory so that they will not go for further review, instead they will go for a repap (preliminary) test after 6-9 months. The identification of Inflammatory slides inturn increases the system accuracy which increases specificity and sensitivity.

Keywords

Cervical Screening System, Feature Extraction, Inflammation, Neutrophils, Segmentation, SVM.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • E. Bengtsson, “Fifty years of attempts to automate screening for cervical cancer,” Medical Imaging Technology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 203-210, May 1999.

  • K. Sujathan, B. Chandralekha, and S. Amma N S, “Handbook on quality assurance in PAP-smear,” Division of Cytopathology, RCC-T, Sep. 2001.

  • K. S. Jaganathan, K. Duraisamy, and J. C. Bose, “Methods of detecting cervical cancer,” Advances in Biological Research ISSN 1992-0067, IDOSI Publications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 226-232, May 2011.

  • R. Kumar, A. Kumar V, P. N. Sharath Kumar, S. Sudhamony, and R. Ravindrakumar “Detection and removal of artifacts in cervical cytology images using support vector machine,” In IT in Medicine and Education (ITME), International Symposium, pp. 717-721, December 2011.

  • P. C. Chandran, N. B. Byju, R. U. Deepak, R. Kumar, and S. Sudhamony, “Cluster detection in cytology images using the cellgraph method,” In International Symposium on Information Technology in Medicine and Education, pp. 923-927, August 2012.

  • M. Pandjaitan, W. Steinberg, J. Suryatenggara, and B. K. Ane, “Pattern recognition on 2d cervical cytological digital images for early detection of cervix cancer,” In World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing, pp. 257-262, Dec. 2009.

  • J. Pamell, J. T. Lewis, D. Ganguly, A. K. Dattamajumdar, D. Wells, and T. C. Wright Jr, “Preliminary experimental results from multi-center clinical trials for detection of cervical precancerous lesions using the Cervical Screening Systemthg system: A novel full-field evoked tissue fluorescence based imaging instrument,” In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual EMBS International Conference, pp. 3150-3152, October 2001.

  • M. Xu, S. Luo, J. S. Jin, Y. Cui, W. S. Felix Wong, Y. Peng, and M. Park, “Detection of nuclei clusters from cervical cancer microscopic imagery using c4.5,” In 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), pp. 593-597, April 2010.

  • Y. Srinivasan, F. Gao, B. Tulpule, S. Yang, S. Mitra, and B. Nutter, “Segmentation and classification of cervix lesions by pattern and texture analysis,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 234-246, 2006.

  • S. Y. Park, D. Sargent, R. Lieberman, and U. Gustafsson, “Domain-specific image analysis for cervical neoplasia detection based on conditional random fields,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 867-878, 2011.

  • A. Kale, and S. Aksoi, “Segmentation of cervical cell images,” In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 2399-2402, May 2010.

  • V. Cui, J. S. Jin, M. Park, S. Luo, M. Xu, Y. Peng, W. S. Felix Wong, and L. D. Santos, “Computer aided abnormality detection for microscopy images of cervical tissue,” pp. 63-68, July 2010.


Abstract Views: 196

PDF Views: 1




  • Inflammation Detection in Cervical Cytology Images

Abstract Views: 196  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

K. V. Sheena
Adi Shankara Institute of Engineering and Technology Kalady, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
K. V. Sikha
Model Engineering College, Thrikkakara, Ernakulam, Kerala, India

Abstract


Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. If detected at a precancerous condition it is completely curable. Several screening methods are available and Pap smear test is a preliminary screening method. Hence an automatic detection method for cervical cancer will be preferred. Cervical Screening System is a computer assisted screening solution, where the digitized images of the PAP-Smear are analyzed and classified through advanced image processing and classification algorithms. The LBC slides are analyzed for the detection of normal and abnormal cells. But some slides will be inflammatory, that are neither normal nor abnormal, but existing systems categorize them as abnormal and will go for further review. The inflammatory slides should be identified and categorized as Inflammatory so that they will not go for further review, instead they will go for a repap (preliminary) test after 6-9 months. The identification of Inflammatory slides inturn increases the system accuracy which increases specificity and sensitivity.

Keywords


Cervical Screening System, Feature Extraction, Inflammation, Neutrophils, Segmentation, SVM.

References