Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Practice-Based Evidence: An "Experimental" Approach to the Theory-Practice Gap in Management
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Management scientists and practitioners ultimately have the same goal: The understanding, control, and prediction of behavior. To this end, we advocate the adoption of experimental methodology on the part of managers as a way to bridge the science-practice gap. We build our argument largely on the distinction between intuitive and systematic approaches to judgment and decision-making. The intuitive approach is more common in management practice, while the systematic approach is embodied by the scientific method. Although recent research suggests that intuitive judgment can be quite effective, we highlight a number of shortcomings of the intuitive approach. Specifically, we show that the intuitive approach is particularly limited when it comes to causal reasoning, and that the experimental approach is designed to overcome this shortcoming.
Keywords
Theory-Practice Gap, Laboratory Research, Experimental Method.
User
Information
- Ahlstrom, D. (2010), Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society, Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3): 11-24.
- Allen, D. G., Bryant, P. C. and Vardaman, J. M. (2010), Retaining Talent: Replacing Misconceptions with Evidence-based Strategies, Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2): 48-64.
- Augier M. and March, J. G. (2011), The Roots, Rituals, and Rhetorics of Change: North American Business Schools after the Second World War, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
- Baron, R. A. (2009), Effectual versus Predictive Logics in Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Differences between Experts and Novices, Does Experience in Starting New Ventures Change the Way Entrepreneurs Think? Perhaps, But for Now, Caution is Essential, Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 310-315.
- Bernard, J. (1995), Scientific Responsibility: Its Role in Pharmacology, in Munson, P. L. (Ed.), Principles of Pharmacology: Basic Concepts, & Clinical Applications, pp. 1761-1768, Chapman & Hall, New York.
- Briner, R. B., Denyer, D. and Rousseau, D. M. (2009), Evidence-based Management: Concept Cleanup Time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4): 19-32.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991), The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34: 39-48.
- Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. (1999), Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
- Corley, K. G. and Gioia, D. A. (2011), Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution, Academy of Management Review, 36: 12-32.
- Dane, E. and Pratt, M. G. (2007), Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making, Academy Of Management Review, 32: 33-54.
- Dijksterhuis, A. (2004), Think Different: The Merits of Unconscious Thought in Preference Development and Decision Making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 586-598.
- Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F. and Van Baaren, R. B. (2006), On Making the Right Choice: The DeliberationwithoutAttention Effect, Science, 311: 1005-1007.
- Gigerenzer, G. (2008), Why Heuristics Work, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3: 20-29.
- Gladwell, M. (2005), Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking, Little, Brown, New York.
- Greenwald, A. G. (2004), The Resting Parrot, The Dessert Stomach, and Other Perfectly Defensible Theories, in Jost, J., Banaji, M. R. and Prentice, D. A. (Eds.), The Yin and Yang of Social Cognition: Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Thought Systems, pp. 275-285, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
- Kahneman, D. (2003), A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality, American Psychologist, 58: 697-720.
- Kahneman, D. and Lovallo, D. (2003), Delusions of Success, Harvard Business Review, 81: 56-63.
- Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D. and Sibony, O. (2011), Before You Make That Big Decision, Harvard Business Review, 89: 50-60.
- Kieser A. and Leiner, L. (2009), Why the Rigour-relevance Gap in Management Research is Unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, 46: 516-533.
- Leavitt, K., Mitchell, T. R. and Peterson, J. (2010), Theory Pruning: Strategies to Reduce Our Dense Theoretical Landscape, Organizational Research Methods, 13: 644-667.
- Lewin, K. (1946), Action Research and Minority Problems, Journal of Social Issues, 2: 34-46.
- Mackenzie K. D. and House, R. (1978), Paradigm Development in the Social Sciences: A Proposed Research Strategy, Academy of Management Review, 3: 7-23.
- Martin, L. L. and Erber R. (2005), The Wisdom of Social Psychology: Five Commonalities and One Concern, Psychological Inquiry, 16: 194-202.
- Mlodinow, L. (2008), The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives, Pantheon, New York.
- Reay, T., Berta, W. and Kohn, M. K. (2009), What’s the Evidence on Evidence-based Management? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4): 5-18.
- Roese, N. J. and Vohs, K. D. (2012), Hindsight Bias, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5): 411-426.
- Ross L. and Nisbett, R. E. (1991), The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Ross, M. (1989), Relation of Implicit Theories to the Construction of Personal Histories, Psychological Review, 96: 341-357.
- Starkey, K. Hatchuel, A. and Tempest, S. (2009), Management Research and the New Logics of Discovery and Engagement, Journal of Management Studies, 46: 547-558.
- Weick, K. E. (1977), Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations: A Reappraisal, Academy of Management Review, 2: 123-128.
- Wilson, T. D. (2005), The Message is the Method: Celebrating and Exporting the Experimental Approach, Psychological Inquiry, 16: 185-193.
- Wilson, T. D. and Schooler, J. (1991), Thinking Too Much: Introspection can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 181-192.
Abstract Views: 355
PDF Views: 9