Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
CSR as Nash Equilibrium
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The concept of "strategy as choice" has been extended to the concept of "strategy as inferior choice" using the Nash Equilibrium framework. This entails the existence of an inter-temporal trade-off between investments today and returns tomorrow. It is with this approach that the activity of Corporate Social Responsibility is viewed. After first distinguishing between CS Accountability and CS Responsibility, it is argued that CSR is like any other investment decision, involving a trade-off between present cost and future benefits. This approach is expanded further to look at a model for evaluating and prioritizing the CSR activity at a corporate level, looking at the components of centrality, specificity, proactivity, voluntarism and visibility. This model has been applied for the Indian oil industry and specific recommendations have been made for firm level focus on CSR.
Keywords
Strategy, CSR, Nash Equilibrium, Trade-offs, Indian Oil Industry
User
Information
- Andrew, Kenneth (1980), The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Irwin.
- Ansoff, HI (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Bowie, Norman (1991), New Directions in Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Horizons (July-Aug).
- Burke, L. and Logsdon, J. M., (1996), How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off, Long Range Planning 29(4).
- Brandenburger, A.M. and Nalebuff, B. (1995), The Right Game: Using Game Theory to Shape Strategy, Harvard Business Review (July-Aug).
- Brian Arthur,W., (1996), Increasing Returns and the New World of Business, Harvard Business Review (July-Aug).
- DeGues, Arie (1997), The Living Company, Harvard Business Review (Mar-Apr).
- Dobb, Maurice (1955), On Economic Theory and Socialism, Chapter IIIc, Rutledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London.
- Drucker, P. (1994), The Theory of Business, Harvard Business Review (Sept-Oct).
- Durkhiem, E. (1893), The Division of Labour in Society, Palgrave Macmillian 1984 (Translated by W D Hall).
- Freeman, R E, and Liedtka, J. (1991), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Approach, Business Horizons (July-Aug).
- Friedman, M. (1970), The Social Responsibility Of Business Is To Increase Profits, New York Times (12 Sept).
- Gandhi, M K (1939), Trusteeship, Navajeevan Trust, Ahmedabad, 1960.
- Kant, Immanuel (1781), A Critique of Pure Reason, reprint Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- L'Erang, J. (1994), Public Relations and Corporate Social Advertising, Journal of Business Ethics (13 Feb).
- L'Etang, J. (1995), Ethical Corporate Social Responsibility: A Framework for Managers, Journal of Business Ethics 14.
- Lynn, J. and Jay, A. (1986), The Complete Yes Prime Minister, BBC Books, London
- Marshall, Alfred (1876); Principles of Economics, reprint Prometheus Books, 1997.
- Mintzberg, H. and Quinn, J. B. (1996), The Strategy Process Concepts Context and Cases (3rd Edition), Prentice Hall.
- Nash, John (1950), Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games, Proceedings of NAS.
- Porter, M E ( 1996). What is Strategy?, Harvard Business Review (Nov-Dec).
- Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review (Mar-Apr).
- Prasad, A. (1998), CSR and the Indian Petroleum Industry, in Hazirika, Anjali (ed), CSR and the Oil Industry : Global Experiences, pp 126-148, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
- Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press.
- Robbins, Lionel (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan, London.
- Russel, Bertrand (1930), Power, reprint Routledge, 1995.
- Smith, Adam (1776), The Wealth of Nations, reprint Penguin, 1982.
- Smith, Craig, (1994), The New Corporate Philanthropy, Harvard Business Review (May-June).
- Walras, Leon (1874), Elements of Pure Economics, reprinted George Allen and Unwin, London, 1954, (Translated by W Jaffe).
Abstract Views: 275
PDF Views: 1