Journal of Management Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Measuring Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness


Affiliations
1 Fogelman College of Business Administration and Economics The University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee 38152
2 The Department of Management W. Frank Barton School of Business Wichita State University Wichita, KS 67206
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this research is two-fold. We first want to demonstrate the use of measures of efficiency and effectiveness to create a typology that is useful for classification of organizational performance. The research further reveals the relationships between the proposed performance typology and various business-level strategies. The findings of this research indicate that strategy selection impacts the proposed performance typology of efficiency and effectiveness. The study concludes with a discussion of our findings and addresses directions for future research.

Keywords

Strategy-performance Relationship, Performance Typology, Business Strategy
User
Notifications

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Phillips, L. W. (1982), Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construct, Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 459-489.

  • Barnard, C. (1939), The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Cameron, K. (1986), A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and its Predictors, Management Science 32: 87-112.

  • Chakravarthy, B. S. (1986), Measuring Strategic Performance, Strategic Management Journal 7: 437-458.

  • Chamberlain, E.H. (1968), The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

  • Churchill, G.A. (1979), A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs, Journal of Marketing Research 16: 64-73.

  • Cool, K., and Schendel, D. (1987), Strategic Group Formation and Performance, Management Science 33: 1102-1124.

  • Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., and Varadarajan, P. R. (1990), Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competencies and Organizational Performance: A Multiple Measures-based Study, Strategic Management Journal 11: 365-383.

  • Cronbach, L.J. (1951), Coefficient Alpha and Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika 16(3): 297-334.

  • Cyert, R.M. and March, J. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

  • Dess, G. G., Newport, S., and Rasheed A. M. (1993), Configuration Research in Strategic Management: Key Issues and Suggestions, Journal of Management 19(4): 775-795.

  • Dess, G. G. and Davis, P. S. (1984), Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance, Academy of Management Journal 27: 467-488.

  • Fiegenbaum, A., Hart, S., and Schendel, D. (1996), Strategic Reference Point Theory, Strategic Management Journal 17(3): 219-236.

  • Ford, J. D. and Schellenberg, D. A. (1982), Conceptual Issues of Linkage in the Assessment of Organizational Performance, Academy of Management Review 7: 49-58.

  • Hambrick, D. C. (1984), Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues, Journal of Management 10 (1): 27-43.

  • Hill, C. W. L. (1988), Differentiation versus Low Cost or Differentiation and Low Cost: A Contingency Framework, Academy of Management Journal 13: 401-412.

  • Jones, G. R., and Butler, J. E. (1988), Costs, Revenue, and Business-level Strategy, Academy of Management Review 13: 202-213.

  • Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L. (1978), The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, New York.

  • Kirchoff, B. A. (1977), Organizational Effectiveness Measures and Policy Research, Academy of Management Review 2 (3): 347-355.

  • Keats, B. N. (1983), On the Measurement of Strategic Performance, paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Strategic Management Society, Paris.

  • Kerlinger, F.N. (1973), Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd edition), Holt Rinehard and Winston, New York.

  • Kotabe, M. (1998), Efficiency vs. Effectiveness Orientation of Global Sourcing: A Comparison of US and Japanese Multinational Companies, Academy of Management Executive 12: 107-119.

  • Lenz, R.T. (1978), Strategic Interdependence and Organizational Performance: Patterns in One Industry, an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.

  • Mahoney, T. A. (1988), Productivity Defined: The Relativity of Efficiency, Effectiveness and Change, in J. P. Campbell, R. J.

  • Campbell, and Assoc., Productivity in Organizations: New Perspectives from Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 230-261, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

  • Mechanic, D. (1963), Some Considerations in the Methodology of Organizational Studies, in H. J. Leavitt (ed.), The Social Science of Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

  • Miles, R. E. and Snow, C. C. (1978), Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Miller, D. (1988), Relating Porter’s Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications, Academy of Management Journal 1: 280-308.

  • Miller, D. (1981), Toward a New Contingency Approach: The Search for Organizational Gestalts, Journal of Management Studies 18(1): 1-26.

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Ostroff, C. and Schmitt, N. (1993), Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency, Academy of Management Journal 36 (6): 1345-1361.

  • Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.

  • Snow, C.C. and Hambrick, D.C. (1980), Measuring Organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems, Academy of Management Review 5: 527-538.

  • Smith, K. G., Gutherie, J. P. and Chen, M. (1989), Strategy, Size, and Performance, Organization Studies 10 (1): 63-81.

  • Steers, R. M. (1975), Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 546-558.

  • Venkatraman, N. and Grant, J.H. (1986), Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal, Academy of Management Review 11: 71-87.

  • Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1985), Construct Validation of Business Economic Performance Measures: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach, paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego.


Abstract Views: 521

PDF Views: 1




  • Measuring Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness

Abstract Views: 521  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Peter S. Davis
Fogelman College of Business Administration and Economics The University of Memphis Memphis, Tennessee 38152
Timothy L. Pett
The Department of Management W. Frank Barton School of Business Wichita State University Wichita, KS 67206

Abstract


The purpose of this research is two-fold. We first want to demonstrate the use of measures of efficiency and effectiveness to create a typology that is useful for classification of organizational performance. The research further reveals the relationships between the proposed performance typology and various business-level strategies. The findings of this research indicate that strategy selection impacts the proposed performance typology of efficiency and effectiveness. The study concludes with a discussion of our findings and addresses directions for future research.

Keywords


Strategy-performance Relationship, Performance Typology, Business Strategy

References