Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Receptor Interactions of Transpeptidase Involved in Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis


Affiliations
1 Department of Bioinformatics, Marudu pandiyar College, Thanjavur
2 Department of Botany and Microbiology, A.V.V.M Sri Pushpam College, Thanjavur.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Analyse the various docking modes of peptidoglycan formation and inhibition is by selecting the test sets from PDB. These test sets were docked by Hex and the resulting docking complex submitted to Spdbv. Distance of the residues in three different states viz. interface area, contact surface area and near native area. The results revealed that ARG 642 (1.33 Å) is found to be the best fit for peptidoglycan formation, GLN 422 (1.45 Å) and TYR 423 (2.15Å) are found to be the best fit for peptidoglycan inhibition using penicillin G and penicillin V respectively. Based on our study it is concluded that penicillin G has the best interacting activity as compared to penicillin V.

Keywords

Docking, Peptidoglycan, Penicillin, Interactions
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Atlas, R.M. (1984) Basic and Practical Microbiology. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
  • Betts, M.J., and Sternberg, M.J. (1999) An analysis of Conformational changes on Protein-Protein association: implications for predictive docking. Protein Engineering,Vol.19, pp:271-283.
  • Cherfils, J.,and Janin, J. (1993) Protein docking algorithms: Simulating Molecular recognition. Current Opinion in structural Biology,Vol.3, pp:265-269.
  • Cooper, G.M. (1997) The cell- A Molecular approach. ASM Press, Washington.
  • Dubey, R.C., and Maheswari, D.K. (2000) A textbook of Microbiology, S. Chand & Company Ltd, New Delhi.
  • Halperin, I., Ma, B.V., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. (2002) Principles of Docking: An overview of Search Algorithms and a Guide to Scoring Functions. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics,Vol.47,pp:409-443.
  • Jiang, F., and Kim, S.H. (1991) Matching of Molecular surface Cube. Journal of Molecular biology, vol.219,pp:79-102.
  • Lengauer, T., and Rarey, M. (1996) Computational methods for biomolecular docking. Current Opinion in structural Biology, Vol.6,pp:402-406.
  • Li, C.H., Ma, X.H., Chen, W.Z., and Wang, C.X., (2003) A Protein-Protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of complexes.Protein Engineering, Vol. 16 (4),pp:265-269.
  • Madigan, M.T., and Martinko, D.K. (2006) Brock Biology of Microorganisms. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  • Morelli, X., Dolla, A., Czjzek, M., Palma, P.N., Blasco, F.,Krippahl, L., Moura, J.J.G., and Guerlesquin, F. (2000) Heteronuclear NMR and Soft docking: an experimental approach for a structural model of the cytochrome c553-ferredoxin complex. Biochemistry,Vol.39,pp:2530-7.
  • Palma, P.N., Krippahl, L., Wampler, J.E., and Moura, J.J.G. (2000) BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting Protein interactions. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics,Vol.39,pp:372-384.
  • Ritchie, D.W. (1998) Parametric Protein Shape Recognition PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.
  • Sotriffer, C.A., Flader, W., Winger, R.H., Rode, B.M., Liedl, K.R., and Varga, J.M. (2000) Automated Docking of Ligands to Antibodies: Methods and Applications. Methods, Vol.20,pp:280-291.
  • Talaro, K.P. (2005) Foundations in Microbiology. McGraw Hill, New York. [16] Taufer, M., Crowley, M., Price, D., Chien, A.A., and Brooks, C.L (2004) Study of a Highly Accurate and Fast Protein-Ligand Docking Algorithm Based on Molecular Dynamics. Third IEEE International Workshop on High Performance Computational Biology (HICOMB 2004),pp:1627-1641.
  • Wenfen, H., (2005) Rigid Body Protein Docking by Fast Fourier Transform. Honor Year Project Report, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, Vol.1.

Abstract Views: 433

PDF Views: 0




  • Receptor Interactions of Transpeptidase Involved in Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis

Abstract Views: 433  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

A. Brindha Devi
Department of Bioinformatics, Marudu pandiyar College, Thanjavur
R. Chandrasekaran
Department of Botany and Microbiology, A.V.V.M Sri Pushpam College, Thanjavur.

Abstract


Analyse the various docking modes of peptidoglycan formation and inhibition is by selecting the test sets from PDB. These test sets were docked by Hex and the resulting docking complex submitted to Spdbv. Distance of the residues in three different states viz. interface area, contact surface area and near native area. The results revealed that ARG 642 (1.33 Å) is found to be the best fit for peptidoglycan formation, GLN 422 (1.45 Å) and TYR 423 (2.15Å) are found to be the best fit for peptidoglycan inhibition using penicillin G and penicillin V respectively. Based on our study it is concluded that penicillin G has the best interacting activity as compared to penicillin V.

Keywords


Docking, Peptidoglycan, Penicillin, Interactions

References