Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Human Resource Development, Agricultural Productivity and Household Income in Rural Jammu and Kashmir.


Affiliations
1 Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir Shalimar Campus, Srinagar, J&K, India
2 Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India
3 Department of School Education, Govt. J&K, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study investigated the quality and quantity of human resource development (HRD) and analyzed its impact on agricultural productivity and household income in rural areas of J and K. It was observed that there has been a differential endowment of land and water resources across different agro-climatic locations in the state. Chi-square estimates indicated significant difference across agro-climatic zones of the state with respect to the accumulation of quality and quantity of HRD. Moreover, the household income was higher in the zone which has maximum value for composite HRD index. The OLS estimates indicated an important role of human resources in determining agricultural productivity and farm household income. As evident from influence on R2 values in each model for all zones, HRD variables have more contribution in enhancement of agricultural productivity and rural income than capital and land though the role of quality of HRD was more significant. Based upon findings, the study put forth few policy suggestions for the sustained accumulation of human capital. Study suggests that inter-regional differences in socio-economic indicators need to be considered while framing HRD strategies so it could be location specific.

Keywords

HRD, Agricultural Productivity, Rural Income, Mountains.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adil, S.A., Ghafoor, A.M., & Nadeem {2005). Investigations into the human resource development status and its impact on farm output in rural areas of district Jhang Pakistan. Journal of'Agriculture andSocialSciences, 7(1), 10-13.
  • Alexandratos, N. (1995). World agriculture towards 2010: An FAO study. FAO of UN and John Wiley and Son Chichester
  • Baba S.H., Saini, A.S., Sharma, K.D., & Thakur, D.R. (2010). Impact of investment on agricultural growth andrural development in Himachal Pradesh: Dynamics of public and private investment. Indian JournalofAgriculturalEconomics, (55(1), 135-158.
  • Baba, S.H., Wani, M.H., &Zargar, B.A. (2012). Study of rural credit and its impact on agricultural growth and sustainable livelihood in J&K. Final Technical Report of UGC sponsored major research project. Division of Agricultural Economics and Marketing, SKUAST-K, Shalimar Campus, Srinagar.
  • Behrman, J.R. (1990). The action of human resources and poverty on one another. World Bank Washington DC.
  • Bhutto, A.W., & Bazmi, A. A. (2007). Sustainable agriculture and eradication of rural poverty in Pakistan. Natural Resources Forum, 37(4), 253-262.
  • Birkhaeuser, D., Evenson, RE., & Feder, G. (1991). The economic impact of agricultural extension: A review. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 39(3), 607-650.
  • Chinn, D.L. (1979). Rural poverty and the structure of farm household income in developing countries: Evidence from Taiwan. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 27(2),2%3-30.
  • Directorate of Economics & Statistics (DE&S) (2010). Economic survey of J&K 201011. Directorate of Economics and Statistics Government of Jammu and Kashmir.
  • El Osta, H.S., & Morehart, MJ. (1999). Technology adoption decisions in dairy production and the role of herd expansion. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 25(1), 84-95.
  • Faisal, A., Sarwar, M.N., Saboor, A., Udin, W, & Mehmood, S. (2005). Prospects of human resource development for mitigating rural poverty: An investigation in Jhang District of Punjab. Indus Journal of Biological Sciences, 2(3), 340-346.
  • FAO, UNESCO, &lLO( 1984). Agricultural Extension: A reference manual. FAO.
  • Griffin, R.K. (1976). On the emigration of the peasantry. World Development, 4(5), 353361.
  • Goswami, S.B., & Sounda, G. (2009). Challenges in technology transfer in put supply and management in agriculture with reference to West Bengal. Indian Agriculturist, 53(3-4), 199-203.
  • Hossain, M., & Sen, B. (1992). Rural poverty in Bangladesh: Trends and determinants. Asian Development Review, 10, 135.
  • Hsieh, S.C. (2006). Agricultural human resource and institutional capacity building through international education with special regards to Taiwan experience. Crop EnvironmentandBioinformatics, 3(2), 97-114.
  • Islam, M.N., Rashid, M.H., & Barakatullah, M. (1998). Correlates of adoption of green revolution technologies with selected characteristics of the farmers. Bangladesh Journal of Training and Development, 77(1-2), 109-114.
  • Kalavathy, S., & Anithakumari, P. (1998). Extent of technology adoption in cowpea cultivation. Journal of 'Tropical Agriculture, 36(1-2), 97-99.
  • Kalwe, S.P, Das, S., & Biswas, B. C. (2000). Strategies to improve agricultural productivity in subsidy free environment. Fertilizer News, 45(12), 97-108.
  • Lipton, M., & Ravallion, M. (1995). Poverty and policy. In J.R. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. Ill, pp. 2551-2657). A North-HollandAmsterdam.
  • Low, L. (1998). Human resource development in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Pacific Economic Literature, 72(1), 27-40.
  • Mukhopadhyay, S. (1990). Rural poverty and inequality in post-reform China. ARTEP Working Papers International Labour Organisation, New Delhi: 1974.
  • Mittal, S., & Kumar, P. (2000). Literacy technology adoption factor demand and productivity: An econometric analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 490-499.
  • Nee, V. (1989). A theory of market transition: From redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review, 54(5), 663-681.
  • Obia, G.C. (1998). Some misconceptions of agricultural production, population and land resources in Africa. Addressing misconceptions about Africa's development: Seeing beyond the veil. Department of Geology and Geography Eastern Illinois University of Charleston, Illinois USA. pp. 112-128.
  • Ozcatalbas, O., & Akcaoz, H. (2010). Rural women and agricultural extension in Turkey. Journal of Food Agriculture andEnvironment, 8(1), 261-267.
  • Radhakrishna, R (2002). Agricultural growth employment and poverty: A policy perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(3), 243-250.
  • Schultz, T.W. (1971). Investment in Human Capital. New York: The Free Press.
  • Schultz, T.W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 57(1). 1-17.
  • Stark, O. (1978). Economic demographic interactions in agricultural development: The case of rural to urban migration. Technical Paper No. 6, FAO, Rome.
  • Singh, K. (2000). Education technology adoption and agricultural productivity. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 473-489.
  • Tajima, S. (1999). The state of agricultural education in selected Asian countries. Trends and perspectives in agricultural education in Asia Pacific, Report of the APO symposium on agricultural education system held in Tokyo Japan from 29 July to 5 August 1997, pp. 29-101.
  • Ureta, B. (2002). Research extension and information: Key inputs in agricultural productivity growth. Pakistan Development Review, 47(4-1), 443-466.
  • UNESCAP (1993). The Fourth Asian and Pacific Population Conference.United Nations, New York.
  • United Nations Development Programme (1996). Human Development Report 1996. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Unni, J. (1998). Non-agricultural employment and poverty in rural India: A review of evidence. Economic andPolitical Weekly, 33(3),A36-A44.
  • Vaswani, L.K. (2010). Role of human resource development in improving agriculture productivity. Indian Journal of 'Fertilizers, 6(A), 88-92.
  • World Bank (1993). World Development Report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank (1980). World Development Report 1980. The World Bank, Washington DC.
  • Zhang, Y (1991). Characteristics causes and policies of rural poverty: A case study of baise prefecture in guanxi province. The Tribute of Economic Development, 5, 134 - 161.

Abstract Views: 158

PDF Views: 0




  • Human Resource Development, Agricultural Productivity and Household Income in Rural Jammu and Kashmir.

Abstract Views: 158  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. H. Baba
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir Shalimar Campus, Srinagar, J&K, India
Omar F. Khan
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India
T. Kawoosa
Department of School Education, Govt. J&K, India

Abstract


This study investigated the quality and quantity of human resource development (HRD) and analyzed its impact on agricultural productivity and household income in rural areas of J and K. It was observed that there has been a differential endowment of land and water resources across different agro-climatic locations in the state. Chi-square estimates indicated significant difference across agro-climatic zones of the state with respect to the accumulation of quality and quantity of HRD. Moreover, the household income was higher in the zone which has maximum value for composite HRD index. The OLS estimates indicated an important role of human resources in determining agricultural productivity and farm household income. As evident from influence on R2 values in each model for all zones, HRD variables have more contribution in enhancement of agricultural productivity and rural income than capital and land though the role of quality of HRD was more significant. Based upon findings, the study put forth few policy suggestions for the sustained accumulation of human capital. Study suggests that inter-regional differences in socio-economic indicators need to be considered while framing HRD strategies so it could be location specific.

Keywords


HRD, Agricultural Productivity, Rural Income, Mountains.

References