Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Vortex Flow Analysis of a Large Segmented Solid Rocket Motor


Affiliations
1 Mechanical Engg. Deptt., Dr.M.G.R.Educational & Research Institute University, Chennai-600095, India
2 Mechanical Engg. Deptt., PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore-560085, India
3 R&D Division, SF Complex, DRDO, Jagdalpur-494001, India
 

It is not uncommon to find pressure oscillations in large size segmented solid rocket motors. During the static test of segmented solid rocket motor (SRM-3), unanticipated pressure oscillations were seen after some of the propellant has burnt and the oscillations sustained for certain duration of time. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of the analysis carried out on the experimental data using commercial CFD software 'FLUENT' and compare the results with experimental data to find out the cause of the pressure oscillations. Inhibitors are provided for the full web thickness of propellant at the segment joint interfaces to prevent end-burning of propellant at the joints. The char and erosion rate of these inhibitions are lower than the burning rate of the propellant. As burning of the propellant progresses, annular inhibition wall starts projecting above the burning surface of the propellant. These obstacles (inhibition) are acting as wall and sheared gas flow occurs in the rocket motor. CFD analysis was carried out on a quadrilateral mesh for the geometry of SRM-3 at the time of 32 s after ignition when the pressure oscillations peaked. It has been found that the vortex shedding frequency obtained by CFD analysis closely matches with the frequency of pressure oscillations occurring during static testing. Thus, it has been revealed that the obstacle vortex shedding generated by the compartmentalization of the combustion chamber by the protrusion of inhibition at the segment joints was the cause of the pressure oscillations in SRM-3.

Keywords

Vortex Shedding, Segmented Solid Rocket Motor, CFD Analysis, Propellant, Combustion Chamber
User

  • Abdul Raheem S and Babu V (2004) Numerical simulations of unsteady flows in Solid Rocket Motors. AIAA 2004-2878, pp: 1-15.

  • Anonymous (2005) Post Test Inspection Report of SRM-3. SF Complex, DRDO, Jagdalpur (Confidential).

  • Anonymous (2005) Static Test Report of SRM-3. SF Complex, DRDO, Jagdalpur (Confidential).

  • Anonymous (2005) Test plan of SRM-3. ASL, DRDO, Hyderabad (Confidential).

  • Anonymous (2006) Frequency Analysis Report of SRM-3. SF Complex, DRDO, Jagdalpur (confidential).

  • David R Greatrix (2008) Transient burning rate model for solid rocket motor internal ballistic simulations. Int. J. Aerospace Engg. (826070), pp: 1-10.

  • Dotson KW, Koshigoe S and Pace KK (1997) Vortex shedding in large solid rocket motor without inhibitors at the segment interfaces. J. Propulsion & Power. 13(2), pp: 197-206.

  • Fluent (2006) 8.4.2 Viscosity as a function of temperature. Documentation FluentInc.

  • Hijlkema J, Prevost M and Cascalis G (2011) On the importance of reduced scale Ariane 5 P230 sold rocket motor models in the comprehension and prevention of thrust oscillations. CEAS Space J. 10thJuly, pp:99-107.

  • Price EW (1977) Combustion instability in solid rocket motors: Volume I– Executive summary, chemical propulsion information agency. The Johns Hopkins University, CPIA Publ., 290, Nov.1,pp:4-5.

  • Robert S Brown, Roger Dunlap and Sunnyvale (1988) Acoustics oscillatory pressure control for solid propellant rocket. Patent Number: 4,765, 134, Aug.23, pp:2-4.

  • Scippa S, Pascal P and Zainer F (1994) Ariane-5 MPS: Chamber pressure oscillations full scale firing results analysis and further studies. AIAApaper94- 3068 - 1994

  • Stella F and Paglia F (2009) Pressure oscillations in solid rocket motors: Effect of nozzle cavity. J. Aerospace Sci., Technol. & Systems. Aerotechnica. 88 (1/2 January –June) pp:31.

  • Stella F, Paglia F, Giangi M and Telara M (2005) Numerical simulation of pressure oscillations in solid rocket motors. Eur. Conf. Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS)Moscow, 5th July, pp: 1-8.

  • Tom Nesman and Eric Stewart (1996) RSRM Chamber pressure oscillations: Transit Time Models and unsteady CFD. NASA, Marshall space flight center, AL 35812, pp: 1169-1187.

  • Yves Fabignon, Joel Dupays, Gerard Avalon, Francois Vuillot, Nicolas Lupoglazoff, Grégoire Casalis and Michel Prévost (2003) Instabilities and pressure oscillations in solid rocket motors. Aerospace & Technol. 7, pp: 191-200.


Abstract Views: 528

PDF Views: 144




  • Vortex Flow Analysis of a Large Segmented Solid Rocket Motor

Abstract Views: 528  |  PDF Views: 144

Authors

Prahalad N. Tengli
Mechanical Engg. Deptt., Dr.M.G.R.Educational & Research Institute University, Chennai-600095, India
C. S. Ramesh
Mechanical Engg. Deptt., PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore-560085, India
K. Viswanathan
, India
R. Saravanan
R&D Division, SF Complex, DRDO, Jagdalpur-494001, India

Abstract


It is not uncommon to find pressure oscillations in large size segmented solid rocket motors. During the static test of segmented solid rocket motor (SRM-3), unanticipated pressure oscillations were seen after some of the propellant has burnt and the oscillations sustained for certain duration of time. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of the analysis carried out on the experimental data using commercial CFD software 'FLUENT' and compare the results with experimental data to find out the cause of the pressure oscillations. Inhibitors are provided for the full web thickness of propellant at the segment joint interfaces to prevent end-burning of propellant at the joints. The char and erosion rate of these inhibitions are lower than the burning rate of the propellant. As burning of the propellant progresses, annular inhibition wall starts projecting above the burning surface of the propellant. These obstacles (inhibition) are acting as wall and sheared gas flow occurs in the rocket motor. CFD analysis was carried out on a quadrilateral mesh for the geometry of SRM-3 at the time of 32 s after ignition when the pressure oscillations peaked. It has been found that the vortex shedding frequency obtained by CFD analysis closely matches with the frequency of pressure oscillations occurring during static testing. Thus, it has been revealed that the obstacle vortex shedding generated by the compartmentalization of the combustion chamber by the protrusion of inhibition at the segment joints was the cause of the pressure oscillations in SRM-3.

Keywords


Vortex Shedding, Segmented Solid Rocket Motor, CFD Analysis, Propellant, Combustion Chamber

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2012%2Fv5i1%2F30951