Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Archaeogenetics: Advent of Genetics in Field of Archaeology


Affiliations
1 Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, India
2 Department of Archaeology, University of Tehran, Enghelab St., Tehran, India
 

In order to prove the archaeological hypotheses, other fields of science such as Anthropology, Botany, Zoology and Chemistry are required. The applications of molecular genetics in answering questions concerning the primitive populations have been clarified. Therefore, pre-historic archaeologists with co-operating of Human evolutionary geneticists and Molecular Anthropologist are forming a new field of study called Archaeogenetics. As one of the applications of this field of study in pre-historic Archaeology of Europe, specific demographic models are provided for the elaborate chronological patterning of agriculture across Europe at the beginning of Neolithic period. In molecular archaeology, genetic materials are used; Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is used for maternal lineages and Y chromosome DNA is used for paternal lineages of pre-historic populations. Through appearing of the advanced techniques of molecular biology, the study of human genetics has faced new revolution. These techniques are increasingly used for discovery and use of genes in anthropology, medicine and forensic genetics. Every person, in his genomes, carries a genetic record of his ancestors. The investigation of the living populations' diversity provides some pieces of information on the evolutionary process, population dispersion and emigration in the past. Therefore, it's time to apply this technology in zonal studies for considering the questions of a specific section of history.

Keywords

Archaeogenetics, Molecular Archaeology, Ancient DNA, Human Evolution, Genetics
User

  • Ariffin SHZ, Wahab RMA, Zamrod Z, Sahar S, Razak MFA, Ariffin EJ and Senafi S (2007) Molecular archeology of ancient bone from 400 year old shipwreck. Asia Pacific J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 15 (1), 27-31.

  • Barbujani G, Magagni A, Minch E and Cavalli –Sforza LL (1997) An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA; 94, 4516-4519.

  • Cann RL, Stoneking M and Wilson AC (1987) Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature. 325, 31-36.

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Piazza A, Menozzi P and Mountain J (1988) Reconstruction of human evolution: Bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85, 6002-6006.

  • Haak W, Forster P, Bramanti B, Matsumura S, Brandt G, Tänzer M, Villems R, Renfrew C, Gronenborn D, Alt KW and Burger J (2005) Ancient DNA from the first European farmers in 7500-year-old Neolithic sites. Science. 310(5750), 1016-1018.

  • Hugo Oliveira (2008) Molecular biology and human past: A theory of Archaeogenetics. Archaeological Rev.from Cambridge; 23, 1,109-126.

  • Ingmam M, Kaessmann H, Paabo S and Gyllensten U (2000) Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans. Nature. 408, 708-713.

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V and Thein SL (1985) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature. 314, 67-73.

  • Jobling MA and Tyler–Smith C (2003) The human Y chromosome: an evolutionary marker comes of age. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 598-612.

  • Kaestle A and Horsburgh KA (2002) Ancient DNA in anthropology: methods, applications and ethics. Year book of physical anthropology.

  • Lander ES, Linton LM, Birron B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409, 860-921.

  • Mahdieh N, Tafsiri E, Karimpour M and Akbari MT (2005) Heterozygosity and allele frequencies of the two VNTRs (APOB and D1S80) in Iranian population. Indian J. Human Genetics. 11(1), 31-34.

  • Mende BG (2006) Possibilities and limitations in the Archaeogenetic analysis of ancient human remains. Archaometriai Muhely. 1, 29-33.

  • Mitchel P (2010) Genetiv and Southern Africa Prehistory: an archaeological view. J. Anthropo. Sci. 88, 73-92.

  • Paabo S (1989a) Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.86, 1939- 1943.

  • Paabo S (1989b) Preservation of DNA in ancient Egyption mummies. J. Archeol. Sci.12, 411-417.

  • Pedro S, Alessandro A, Ornella S, William D, Vincent M, Hans-jurgen B, Antonio T and Martin B (2010) The Archaeogenetics of Europe. Curr. Biol. R174-R183.

  • Petraglia MD, Haslam M, Fuller DQ, Boivin N and Clarkson C (2010) Out of Africa: new hypotheses and for the dispersal of Homo sapiens along evidence the Indian Ocean rim. Ann. Human Biol. 37(3), 288-311.

  • Renfrew C (2001) From molecular genetics to archaeogenetics. PNAS; 98(9), 4830-4832.

  • Sokal (2001) Archaeolgenetics: DNA and the population pre-history of Europe. Am. J. Human Genet. 69, 243- 244.

  • Theodor G. Schurr (2004) The Peopling of the New World: perspectives from Molecular Anthropology. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 33, 551-583

  • Tibor K, Csanad Z, Bachrati AM and Istvan R (2000) A simple and efficient method for PCR amplifiable DNA extraction from ancient bone. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, E67-E67.

  • Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, et al. (2001) The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291, 1304-1351.

  • Yang DY and Watt K (2005) Contamination controls when preparing archeological remains for ancient DNA analysis. J. Sci. Archeological. 32, 331-336.

  • Yang DY, Eng B and Sauners SR (2003) Hypersensitive PCR, ancient human mtDNA and contamination. Human Biol. 75, 355-364.


Abstract Views: 404

PDF Views: 82




  • Archaeogenetics: Advent of Genetics in Field of Archaeology

Abstract Views: 404  |  PDF Views: 82

Authors

M. Montazer Zohouri
Yasouj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasouj, India
K. Niknami
Department of Archaeology, University of Tehran, Enghelab St., Tehran, India

Abstract


In order to prove the archaeological hypotheses, other fields of science such as Anthropology, Botany, Zoology and Chemistry are required. The applications of molecular genetics in answering questions concerning the primitive populations have been clarified. Therefore, pre-historic archaeologists with co-operating of Human evolutionary geneticists and Molecular Anthropologist are forming a new field of study called Archaeogenetics. As one of the applications of this field of study in pre-historic Archaeology of Europe, specific demographic models are provided for the elaborate chronological patterning of agriculture across Europe at the beginning of Neolithic period. In molecular archaeology, genetic materials are used; Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is used for maternal lineages and Y chromosome DNA is used for paternal lineages of pre-historic populations. Through appearing of the advanced techniques of molecular biology, the study of human genetics has faced new revolution. These techniques are increasingly used for discovery and use of genes in anthropology, medicine and forensic genetics. Every person, in his genomes, carries a genetic record of his ancestors. The investigation of the living populations' diversity provides some pieces of information on the evolutionary process, population dispersion and emigration in the past. Therefore, it's time to apply this technology in zonal studies for considering the questions of a specific section of history.

Keywords


Archaeogenetics, Molecular Archaeology, Ancient DNA, Human Evolution, Genetics

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2011%2Fv4i8%2F30911