Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Prediction Use of English Language Learning Strategies Based on Personality Traits among the Female University Level Learners


Affiliations
1 Department of English Language Teaching, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
 

The current study aims to explore the prediction use of English language learning strategies based on personality traits among female university level learners of English language as a university major subject at Islamic Azad University in Iran. Four instruments were used, which were the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) of Rebecca L. Oxfords, A Background Questionnaire, the NEO-Five Factors Inventory (NEO-FFI), and the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). Two hundred and thirteen Iranian female students volunteered to participate in this research study. The intact classes were chosen. The obtained results in this study show that the Conscientiousness trait and the Extraversion trait best predicted the overall use of Memory strategies of the students, and the Openness to Experiences trait and the Conscientiousness trait best predicted the overall use of Cognitive strategies, Compensation strategies, Metacognitive strategies, Affective strategies, and Social strategies of the learners.

Keywords

English Language, Learning Strategies, Personality Trait, Female Students, Islamic Azad University, Iran
User

  • Abu Shmais W (2004) The English language learning strategies of Al-Najah national university EFL majors. J. Islamic Univ. Gaza. Retrieved July 8, 2010. 12(1), 51-75.
  • Chamot AU, Barnhardt S, El-Dinnary PB and Rubbins J (1999) The learning strategies handbook. NY: Longman.
  • Costa PT and McCare RR (1992) Professional manual for the NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Odessa, FL: Psychol. Assessment Resources.
  • Digman JM and Inouye J (1986) Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 50,116-123.
  • Ellis R (1985) Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Ely CM (1986) An analysis of discomfort, risk taking, sociability, and motivation in the L2 classroom. Lang. Learning. 36(1), 1-25.
  • Fakeye DO and Ogunsiji Y (2009) English language proficiency as a predictor of academic achievement among EFL students in Nigeria. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 3, 490- 495.
  • Ghiasvand A (2008) Application of statistics and SPSS in data analysis. Tehran: Lovieh Publ.
  • Goldberg LR (1981) Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In: Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Wheeler L (Ed.). Beverrly Hills, CA: Sage. 2, 141-165.
  • Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative description of personality: The big five factor structure. J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216-1229.
  • John OP (1990) The big five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the nature language and in the questionnaire. In: Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Pervin LA (Ed.). NY: Guilford Press. pp: 66-100.
  • Kalantari K (2008) Data processing and analysis in socioeconomic research. Tehran: Farhang Saba Publ.
  • McCare RR and Costa PT Jr (1985) Updating Norman’s adequate taxonomy: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. J. Pers. & Psychol. 49, 710-721.
  • Moemeni M (2007) Statistical analysis with SPSS. Tehran: Ketab neo Publ.
  • O'Malley JM, Chamot AU, Stewner- Manzanares G, Russo RP and Kupper L (1985) Language strategy application with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly. 19(13), 557-584.
  • Oxford RL (1990) What every teacher should know. In: Language learning strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Oxford RL (1996) Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Appl. Lang. Learn. 7(1& 2), 25-45.
  • Pallant J (2007) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rded.). New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unmin.
  • Reiss MA (1983). Helping the unsuccessful language learner. Canadian Modern Lang. Rev.39(2), 257-266.
  • Saucier G and Goldberg LR (1996) Evidence for the big five in analyses of familiar English personality adjectives. Europ. J. Pers.7, 1-17.
  • Seyed Hossein Fazeli (2012a) The influence of personality traits on the use of memory English language learning strategies Indian J.Sci.Technol. 5 (7) 3041- 3046.
  • Seyed Hossein Fazeli (2012b) The overall relationships between the use of English language learning strategies and personality traits among the female university level learners of English language as a University Major. Indian J. Innovations. Dev . 1 (7), 523-531.
  • Seyed Hossein Fazeli (2012c) The relationship between the extraversion trait and use of the English language learning strategies. Indian J.Sci.Technol. 5 (4) 2651-2657.
  • Sharp A (2008) Personality and second language learning. Asian Soc. Sci. 4(11), 17-25.
  • Strong M (1983) Social styles and the second language acquisition of Spanish speaking kindergartners. TEOSLQuarterly. 17(2), 241-258.
  • TOEFL samples (2009) Tehran: Rahnama Publ.
  • Wenden A (1985) Learner strategies. TESOL Newsletter. 19(5), 1-7.

Abstract Views: 390

PDF Views: 107




  • The Prediction Use of English Language Learning Strategies Based on Personality Traits among the Female University Level Learners

Abstract Views: 390  |  PDF Views: 107

Authors

Seyed Hossein Fazeli
Department of English Language Teaching, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


The current study aims to explore the prediction use of English language learning strategies based on personality traits among female university level learners of English language as a university major subject at Islamic Azad University in Iran. Four instruments were used, which were the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) of Rebecca L. Oxfords, A Background Questionnaire, the NEO-Five Factors Inventory (NEO-FFI), and the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL). Two hundred and thirteen Iranian female students volunteered to participate in this research study. The intact classes were chosen. The obtained results in this study show that the Conscientiousness trait and the Extraversion trait best predicted the overall use of Memory strategies of the students, and the Openness to Experiences trait and the Conscientiousness trait best predicted the overall use of Cognitive strategies, Compensation strategies, Metacognitive strategies, Affective strategies, and Social strategies of the learners.

Keywords


English Language, Learning Strategies, Personality Trait, Female Students, Islamic Azad University, Iran

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2012%2Fv5i8%2F30543