Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Low Cost Solar Cooker: Promising Solution towards Reducing Indoor Air Pollution from Solid Fuel Use


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Physics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
 

This paper presents the design, development and on-field studies of a low cost solar cooker which can act as a promising solution towards reducing the adverse impacts of indoor air pollution on the health of women and children of developing countries. The developed low cost solar cooker has been fabricated mainly through packaging cardboard, used oil tins, packaging insulation material, light weight polymeric glaze and reflector. The study reveals that the temperature profiles of the developed solar cooker are slightly better than the commercially available fibre body solar cooker. The figures of merit (F1&F2) for the low cost solar cooker are 0.122 and 0.55 which are higher as compared to the commercial solar cooker values of 0.115 and 0.43. The payback periods for the developed solar cooker with respect to various fuels such as firewood, kerosene, LPG, coal and electricity are in the range of three months to less than 2 years.

Keywords

Solar Cooker, On-Field Study, Payback Periods, Figures of Merit, Indoor Air Pollution
User

  • Bahaj AS (2002) Means of enhancing and promoting the use of solar energy. Renew. Energy. 27, 97-105.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) IS 13429:1992.

  • Dashora P and Sengar N (2002) A novel design for low cost, lightweight domestic solar cooker with variable inclination glaze option. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on recent advances in solar energy conversion systems. Nema RK & Bhagoria JL (eds.), MANIT, Bhopal. pp: 161-166.

  • Dashora P, Sengar N and Gupta M (2005) A novel versatile building material housing solar cooker: Boon for developing nations. In: Proc. of solar world congress. Goswami DY, Vijayraghavan S & Campbell-Howe R (eds.), paper no. 1327. ISES, Orlando.

  • Dashora P, Sengar N and Pareek S K (2005) Development and study of a novel lightweight lowcost solar cooker. In: Proc. of solar world congress. Goswami DY, Vijayraghavan S & Campbell-Howe, R (eds.), paper no. 1197. ISES, Orlando.

  • Desai M, Mehta S and Smith K (2004) Indoor smoke from solid fuels: Assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels. In: Environ. Pruss-Ustun A, Campbell-Lendrum D, Corvalan C & Woodward A (eds.) Burden of Disease Series no. 4 . World Health Organisation, Geneva.

  • Jefferson M (2006) Sustainable energy development: Performance and prospects. Renew. Energy. 31, 571-582.

  • Joshi SK (2006) Solid biomass fuel: Indoor air pollution and health effects. Kathmandu Univ. Med. J. 4(2), 141-142.

  • Mishra V (2003) Indoor air pollution from biomass combustion and acute respiratory illness in preschool age children in Zimbabwe. Int. J. Epidemiol. 32, 847- 853.

  • Mullick SC (2002) Evaluation of solar cooker performance – An overview. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on recent advances in solar energy conversion systems (eds. Nema RK & Bhagoria JL), MANIT, Bhopal. pp: 45-47.

  • Mullick SC, Kandpal TC and Saxena AK (1987) Thermal test procedure for box type solar cookers. Solar Energy. 39(4), 353-360.

  • Nahar NM (2001) Design development and testing of a double reflector hot box solar cooker with transparent insulation material. Renew. Energy 23, 167-179.

  • Pachauri S (2007) An energy analysis of household consumption: Changing patterns of direct and indirect use in India. Springer, Netherlands.

  • Painuly JP (2001) Barriers to renewable energy penetration: A framework for analysis. Renew. Energy. 24, 73-89.

  • Pandey PK, Bhattacharya D and Pateria RN (2003) Planning of energy resources for sustainable development of rural India: A case study of rural energy resources in Jakhi village. In: Energy Technol. for Sustainable development. Pandel U & Poonia MP (eds.), Prime publishing, Ghaziabad. pp: 46-52.

  • Parikh J, Balakrishna K, Laxmi V and Biswas H (2001) Exposure from cooking with biofuels: Pollution monitoring and analysis for rural Tamil Nadu, India. Energy. 26, 949-962.

  • Peter SMJ and Vennila K (2007) Indoor air pollution- Effects and our responsibilities. In: Energy & Environ. Interaction: Future challenges. Solomon RD (ed.), Deep and deep publications. pp: 233-239. New Delhi.

  • United Nations development programme (UNDP) (2009) Legros G, Havet I, Bruce N and Bonjour S. The energy access situation in developing countries: A review focusing on the least developed countries and Sub-Saharan Africa.

  • World Health Organisation (WHO) (2008) Evaluating household energy and health interventions- A catalogue of methods. pp: 4-5.


Abstract Views: 452

PDF Views: 132




  • Low Cost Solar Cooker: Promising Solution towards Reducing Indoor Air Pollution from Solid Fuel Use

Abstract Views: 452  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

Namrata Sengar
Dept. of Physics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Prabha Dashora
Dept. of Physics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Sunita Mahavar
Dept. of Physics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


This paper presents the design, development and on-field studies of a low cost solar cooker which can act as a promising solution towards reducing the adverse impacts of indoor air pollution on the health of women and children of developing countries. The developed low cost solar cooker has been fabricated mainly through packaging cardboard, used oil tins, packaging insulation material, light weight polymeric glaze and reflector. The study reveals that the temperature profiles of the developed solar cooker are slightly better than the commercially available fibre body solar cooker. The figures of merit (F1&F2) for the low cost solar cooker are 0.122 and 0.55 which are higher as compared to the commercial solar cooker values of 0.115 and 0.43. The payback periods for the developed solar cooker with respect to various fuels such as firewood, kerosene, LPG, coal and electricity are in the range of three months to less than 2 years.

Keywords


Solar Cooker, On-Field Study, Payback Periods, Figures of Merit, Indoor Air Pollution

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2010%2Fv3i9%2F29884