Indian Journal of Science and Technology

The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


Deep drawing and hydroforming deep drawing (HDD) are the two conventional methods for production of cylindrical cups. In this paper, two cylindrical workpieces have been produced with separated dies and the deformation force and sheet thickness distributions have been compared. For increasing drawing ratio in the hydroforming deep drawing, pressure chamber must be calculated and exerted properly. Limited tearing pressure curve have been obtained with finite element simulation. By considering of this approach and conducting a series of hydroforming experiments, proper pressure will be selected. Finally, workpiece was drawn with 2.3 drawing ratio by using proper pressure path. Results have shown that although hydroforming deep drawing needs more forces, more drawing ratio can be achieved as a result.

Keywords

Conventional Deep Drawing, Hydroforming Deep Drawing (HDD), Finite Element Simulation
User