Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Investigation of Indian Secondary Level Students' Alternative Conceptions of Water Pollution


Affiliations
1 Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Unit-IX, Bhubaneswar-751022, Orissa, India
2 Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Puskar Road, Ajmer – 305004, Rajasthan, India
 

The prevalence of the ideas of secondary students (class X) about causes, consequences and remedies of water pollution was determined using a closed form of questionnaire. Many of the Indian students in the present study were unaware of the devastating effect of deforestation, chemical fertilizers employed in agricultural fields, offshore mining, smoke, volcanic eruptions, weathering of soil and rocks on pollution of water and its impact on humans viz. blindness, DNA damage, deformities of bones etc. Prevalent alternative conceptions and misconceptions were: sewage, pesticides, soil erosions do not pollute water; water pollution causes acid rain; radioactive waste dumped in oceans and greenhouse effect could minimize water pollution and BOD of sewage water is very less than that of pure drinking water. It exposes the lacuna in Indian educational system and suggests a strong drive to displace misconceptions at the early stage of learning itself, before they become embedded in an alternative conceptual frame work.

Keywords

India, Secondary School, Science Education, Water Pollution, Environment, Awareness
User

  • Behar M (2003) Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Kuram ve uygulamada Eg. Bil. 3, 55-64.

  • Blum A (1984) What do Israel high school students know and believe about environmental issues? Environ. Edu. Info. 3, 338-48.

  • Blum A (1987) Students’ knowledge and beliefs concerning environmental issues in four countries. J. Environ. Edu. 18(3), 7-13.

  • Bohl WB (1976) A survey of cognitive and affectivecomponents of selected environmentally relatedattitudes of tenth and twelve grade students in six midwestern, four southwestern and twelve plains and mountain states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the Ohio State Univ.

  • Cardak O (2009) Science students’ misconceptions of the water cycle according to their drawings. J. Appl. Sci. 1-9.

  • Carlsson B (2002) Ecological understanding 2: transformation – a key to ecological understanding. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 24, 701-715.

  • Cetin G (2007) English and Turkish pupils’ understanding of decomposition. Asia Pacific for Science Learn Teach. 8, 1-1.

  • Cortes LP (1991) A survey of the environmental knowledge, comprehension, responsibility and interest of the secondary level students and teachers in the Philippines. Garland Publ., NY.

  • Ekborg M (2003) How student teachers use scientific conceptions to discuss a complex environmental issue. J. Biol. Edu. 37, 126-132.

  • Ekborg M (2005) Student teachers learning outcomes during science subject matter courses. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 27, 1671-1694.

  • Eyeers VG (1975) Environmental knowledge and beliefs among tenth grade students in Australia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.

  • Francis C, Boyes E, Qualter A and Stanisstreet M (1993) Ideas of elementary students about reducing the greenhouse effect. Sci. Edu. 77 (4), 375-392.

  • Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ and Ephraums JJ (1990) Climate change: the intergovernmental panel on climate change scientific assessment. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK.

  • Kali Y, Orion N and Eylon B (2003) The effects of knowledge integration activities on students perception of the earths’ crust as a cyclic system. J. Res. Scui. Teach. 40, 545-565.

  • Lau TL (1992) Environmental issues: singapore student awareness. Unpublished academic exercise. Dept. of Geography, Natl. Univ. Singapore.

  • O-Saki KM and Samiroden WD (1990) Students’ conceptions of living and dead. J. Biol. Edu. 24, 199-207.

  • Perkes AC (1973) A survey of environmental knowledge and attitudes of tenth and twelfth grade students from five great lakes and six far western states unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State Univ.

  • Richmond JM (1976) A survey of the environmental knowledge and attitudes of fifth year students in England. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State Univ.

  • Sander EO, Jelemenska P and Kattmann U (2006) Towards a better understanding of ecology. J. Biol. Edu. 40, 119-123.

  • Sewell A (2002) Constructivism and student misconceptions why every teacher needs to know about them. Aus. Sci. Teaching J. 48, 24-28.

  • Tekkaya C (2003) Remediating high schools misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Res. Sci. Teach. Edu. 21, 5-16.

  • Tickell C (1991) The quality of life: what quality? whose life? Address to the British Association, reported in the Independent Newspaper, p:3.

  • Towler J and Swan JE (1972) What do people really know about pollution? In: Interpreting rnvrionmental issues, research and development in conservation communication. Schoenfeld C (ed.), Madison: Dembar Educational Res. Services. Pp: 245-248.

  • Wandersee JH, Mintzes JJ and Novak JD (1994) Research on alternative conceptions in science. In: Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Gabel DL (Ed.), MacMillan, New York. pp:177-210.


Abstract Views: 513

PDF Views: 124




  • An Investigation of Indian Secondary Level Students' Alternative Conceptions of Water Pollution

Abstract Views: 513  |  PDF Views: 124

Authors

Animesh K. Mohapatra
Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Unit-IX, Bhubaneswar-751022, Orissa, India
Mriganky Bhadauria
Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Puskar Road, Ajmer – 305004, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


The prevalence of the ideas of secondary students (class X) about causes, consequences and remedies of water pollution was determined using a closed form of questionnaire. Many of the Indian students in the present study were unaware of the devastating effect of deforestation, chemical fertilizers employed in agricultural fields, offshore mining, smoke, volcanic eruptions, weathering of soil and rocks on pollution of water and its impact on humans viz. blindness, DNA damage, deformities of bones etc. Prevalent alternative conceptions and misconceptions were: sewage, pesticides, soil erosions do not pollute water; water pollution causes acid rain; radioactive waste dumped in oceans and greenhouse effect could minimize water pollution and BOD of sewage water is very less than that of pure drinking water. It exposes the lacuna in Indian educational system and suggests a strong drive to displace misconceptions at the early stage of learning itself, before they become embedded in an alternative conceptual frame work.

Keywords


India, Secondary School, Science Education, Water Pollution, Environment, Awareness

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2009%2Fv2i11%2F29539