Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Productivity of Labor Based on Labor Intensive Work for Small Group Contractors in Building Construction Projects in Surabaya, Indonesia


Affiliations
1 Departement of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia
 

Objectives: To determine the productivity coefficient, differentiate the labor productivity coefficient in the morning and afternoon, differentiate the daily labor and pieceworker productivity and differentiate the labor productivity with the Indonesian National Standard coefficient. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The method used in this study is survey and the object of this study is foreman, chief builder, artisan and coolies. Data collection is conducted by volume measurement and observation. Analyses used are difference test. Findings: The result of this study is for foundation excavation work, the excavation of sand under foundation, excavation of filling used soil and ring beam. The foreman productivity in the average of working hours is greater than Indonesian National Standard (α<5%) while the carpenters and the masons productivity for the work of ring beams in the average working hours are greater than Indonesian National Standard. The foreman productivity in the average working hours is smaller than Indonesian National Standard productivity (α>5%) for the foundation excavation, the excavation of sand under foundation, excavation of filling used soil and ring beam while the daily carpenters and masons and pieceworker contract productivity are smaller than Indonesian National Standard productivity at the work of ring beam. Application: Labor productivity in the industry construction is important to be analyzed, since the success of contractor depends on the cost savings associated with the productivity.
User

  • Soeharto I. Manajemen proyek dari konseptual sampai operasional. Jakarta: Erlangga; 1995.

  • El-Gohary KM, Aziz R. Factoring influencing construction labor productivity in Egypt. Journal Management Engineering. 2014; 30(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000168

  • Ervianto WI. Manajemen proyek konstruksi.Yogyakarta. Andi Ofset; 2005.

  • Ervianto WI. Pengukuran produktivitas kelompok pekerja bangunan dalam proyek konstruksi (Studi Kasus Proyek Gedung Bertingkat di Surakarta). Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta. 2009; 9(1):31–42.

  • Basari K, Pradipta RY, Hatmoko JUD, Hidayat A. Analisa koefisien produktivitas tenaga kerja pada pekerjaan pembesian. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil. 2014; 3(4):830–9.

  • Abriyani S. Analisis kerja lembur dan produktivitas tukang batu pada proyek konstruksi. E-Jurnal Wahana Teknik Sipil. 2007; 12(3):1–12.

  • Sukamto AQ. Analisa perbandingan harga satuan pekerjaan beton bertulang Berdasarkan Sni Dan Software Ms Project. Jurnal Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknik sipil. 2014; 1(2):1–8.

  • Solichul T, Sudiajeng L. Ergonomi untuk kesehatan, keselamatan kerja dan produktivitas. Surakarta: Uniba press; 2004.

  • Agus N. Perbandingan produktivitas tenaga kerja konstruksi pada jam kerja reguler dan jam kerja lembur pada pembangunan gedung bertingkat di surabaya. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil. 2015; 1(1):1–6.

  • Prasetia MH, Tjakra J, Pingkan P. Perbandingan antara biaya nyata dengan biaya teliti pada proyek konstruksi (Studi Kasus : Proyek Gedung Indomaret Sam Ratulangi, Manado). Tekno Journal. 2015; 13(64):1–10.

  • Asiyanto. Manajemen Produksi untuk Jasa Konstruksi. Jakarta: Penerbit Pradnya Paramita; 2005.

  • Kaming, PF. Factor influencing craftsmen’s productivity in Indonesia. International Journal of Project Management. 1997; 15(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00019-1

  • Thomas AV. Sudhakumar J. Factors influencing construction labour productivity: An indian case study. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. 2014; 19(1):53–68.

  • Soham M. Rajiv B. Critical factors affecting labour productivity in construction project: case study of south gujarat region of India. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology. 2013; 2(4):1–9.

  • Chigara B. Moyo T. Factors affecting labor productivity on building project in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering and Construction. 2014; 3(1):57015065.

  • Durdyev S. Construction productivity in turkmenistan: survey of the constraining factors. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning. 2013; 3(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.186

  • Abdel I. Designing a model for mearsuring and evaluating crew productivity for the construction of steel structure projects. Global Journal for Research Analysis. 2015; 4.

  • Tanto D. Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas pekerja pada pengerjaan atap baja ringan di perumahan Green Hills Malang. Jurnal Rekayasa. 2012; 6(1):1–14.

  • Shashank K. Analysis of key factors affecting the variation of labour productivity in construction projects. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 2014; 4(5):1–15.

  • Bachtiyar A, Lubis Z. Analisa harga satuan pekerjaan pada gedung perpustakaan universitas islam lamongan dengan metode SNI. Journal of Teknika. 2013; 5(1):1–6.


Abstract Views: 233

PDF Views: 0




  • Productivity of Labor Based on Labor Intensive Work for Small Group Contractors in Building Construction Projects in Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract Views: 233  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Feri Harianto
Departement of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia
Mohamad F. N. Aulady
Departement of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia
Mila K. Wardani
Departement of Civil Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia

Abstract


Objectives: To determine the productivity coefficient, differentiate the labor productivity coefficient in the morning and afternoon, differentiate the daily labor and pieceworker productivity and differentiate the labor productivity with the Indonesian National Standard coefficient. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The method used in this study is survey and the object of this study is foreman, chief builder, artisan and coolies. Data collection is conducted by volume measurement and observation. Analyses used are difference test. Findings: The result of this study is for foundation excavation work, the excavation of sand under foundation, excavation of filling used soil and ring beam. The foreman productivity in the average of working hours is greater than Indonesian National Standard (α<5%) while the carpenters and the masons productivity for the work of ring beams in the average working hours are greater than Indonesian National Standard. The foreman productivity in the average working hours is smaller than Indonesian National Standard productivity (α>5%) for the foundation excavation, the excavation of sand under foundation, excavation of filling used soil and ring beam while the daily carpenters and masons and pieceworker contract productivity are smaller than Indonesian National Standard productivity at the work of ring beam. Application: Labor productivity in the industry construction is important to be analyzed, since the success of contractor depends on the cost savings associated with the productivity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i40%2F131160