Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Quality in Wireless Transmissions of 3D Video with The HEVC Standard


Affiliations
1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Surcolombiana University, Colombia
 

Objectives: In this work, the assessment of 3D video quality is performed with the HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding) standard over a wireless transmission considering the diversity MIMO schemes. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The video sequences in both Multiview Extension and 3D-Extension with its depth map using the HEVC standard were encoded. In addition, three different diversity MIMO schemes and a turbo codec in the system were considered. The BER results obtained using the Montecarlo simulation for packet loss were implemented to evaluate the 3D video sequence at the output of the system, it based in the objective and subjective assessment. Findings: In 3D video encoding with multiple views using HEVC standard with GOP All-Intra coding structure, packets of different texture views can be lost, but in 3D video encoding with DIBR and depth data, you cannot miss any package of the texture views, because the video cannot be decoded. The coding structures of GOP type IPBB and IPPP is more susceptible to the package loss, so the transmission protocol TCP is the suitable. Therefore, this scheme in real- time transmission is not recommended. The increase of diversity in the MIMO schemes decreases the package loss, in this way, the increasing of the video quality that is verified using the objective assessment, but it with a cost of velocity transmission due that is required more intervals of transmission in the MIMO scheme i.e. (with redundant information). The packet loss in wireless transmissions with MIMO 3D video schemes encoded with HEVC standard it has greater impact on the degradation of the video sequences of high mobility than the low mobility. Application/Improvements: The assessment of 3D Video quality using the HEVC standard and its transmission through a wireless channel is using the diversity MIMO schemes which takes advantage of spatial dimension.
User

  • TCP Options and Maximum Segment Size (MSS). [Internet]. [cited 2012 Jul 23]. Available from:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6691.
  • Bross B, Han W-J, Sullivan GJ, Ohm J-R, Wiegand T. High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). Text specification draft 9, document JCTVC-K1003, ITU-T/ISO/IEC Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC); 2012
  • Culturacion. Diferencias entre HD, Ultra HD y 4K.[Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar 12]. Available from:http://culturacion.com/diferencias-entre-hd-ultra-hd-y-4k/.
  • Dorado S, Santacruz J, Pino F. Propuesta de Estructuras con Tensores para la Implementación de Esquemas MIMO. Revista S&T. 2014; 12(29):85–102.
  • Haykin S, Moher M. Modern wireless communications. International Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall; 2005. p. 357–63.
  • ITU-R. Recommendation BT 500-11: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union Recommendation Assembly; 2002.
  • ITU-T H.264. Series H: Audiovisual and multimedia systems, infrastructure of audiovisual services-coding of moving video, advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services. The International Telecommunication Union; 2011. p. 1–674.
  • Lopez S. Transmisión de Video 3D sobre Redes P2P. Proyecto Fin de Carrera Ingeniería Técnica de Telecomunicaciones, Especialidad en Telematica. Universitat Politécnica De Catalunya; 2012. p. 1–58.
  • Ndjiki-Nya P, Köppel M, Doshkov D, Lakshman H, Merkle P, Müller K, Wiegand T. Depth image-based rendering with advanced texture synthesis for 3-D video. IEEE Transactions On Multimedia. 2011; 13(3):453–65. https:// doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2011.2128862
  • Neto AV, Da Silva HW, Cerqueira EC, De Souza JN, Pirmez L, Gomes DG, Aguiar RL. Enhancing smart grid with sessionoriented communication system to truly support reliability and robustness. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy. 2012; 3(4):260–5. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2012.34036
  • Obando M, Freitas W, Cavalcanti F. Switching between hybrid MIMO structures for video transmission based on distortion model. IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference; 2010. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ VETECF.2010.5594528
  • Souceforge. IT++ Documentation [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 06]. Available from: http://itpp.sourceforge.net/4.3.1.
  • Suarez J, Valencia O. Dise-o de un modelo objetivo para evaluar la calidad de video 3D anaglifo. Proyecto Fin de Carrera Ingeniería Electrónica. Universidad Surcolombiana; 2016. p. 25–9.
  • Sullivan G, Ohm J-R, Han W-J, Wiegand T. Overview of the high Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard.IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 2012; 22(12):1649–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TCSVT.2012.2221191
  • Gerhard T, Ying C, Karsten Müller; Jens-Rainer Ohm; Anthony Vetro; Ye-Kui Wang overview of the multiview and 3D extensions of high efficiency video coding. Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 2016; 26(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2015.2477935

Abstract Views: 181

PDF Views: 0




  • Quality in Wireless Transmissions of 3D Video with The HEVC Standard

Abstract Views: 181  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jesus D. Quintero Polanco
Department of Electronic Engineering, Surcolombiana University, Colombia
Martin D. Bravo Obando
Department of Electronic Engineering, Surcolombiana University, Colombia
Diego F. Sendoya
Department of Electronic Engineering, Surcolombiana University, Colombia

Abstract


Objectives: In this work, the assessment of 3D video quality is performed with the HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding) standard over a wireless transmission considering the diversity MIMO schemes. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The video sequences in both Multiview Extension and 3D-Extension with its depth map using the HEVC standard were encoded. In addition, three different diversity MIMO schemes and a turbo codec in the system were considered. The BER results obtained using the Montecarlo simulation for packet loss were implemented to evaluate the 3D video sequence at the output of the system, it based in the objective and subjective assessment. Findings: In 3D video encoding with multiple views using HEVC standard with GOP All-Intra coding structure, packets of different texture views can be lost, but in 3D video encoding with DIBR and depth data, you cannot miss any package of the texture views, because the video cannot be decoded. The coding structures of GOP type IPBB and IPPP is more susceptible to the package loss, so the transmission protocol TCP is the suitable. Therefore, this scheme in real- time transmission is not recommended. The increase of diversity in the MIMO schemes decreases the package loss, in this way, the increasing of the video quality that is verified using the objective assessment, but it with a cost of velocity transmission due that is required more intervals of transmission in the MIMO scheme i.e. (with redundant information). The packet loss in wireless transmissions with MIMO 3D video schemes encoded with HEVC standard it has greater impact on the degradation of the video sequences of high mobility than the low mobility. Application/Improvements: The assessment of 3D Video quality using the HEVC standard and its transmission through a wireless channel is using the diversity MIMO schemes which takes advantage of spatial dimension.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i29%2F130048