Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Management Control of Infrastructure Projects in the Public Entities of the Colombian Department of La Guajira


Affiliations
1 Riohacha, Colombia
2 Research Group, IPAITUG, Universidad de La Guajira, Colombia
3 Research Group, BIEMARC, Universidad de La Guajira,, Colombia
 

Objectives: To analyze the control model in the management of infrastructure projects in municipalities and public entities of the department of La Guajira, Colombia. Materials and Methods: The research was descriptive, non-experimental and transactional. The population was composed of supervisors, directors of municipal governments and the government of the department of La Guajira. For the collection of data, we used the technique of observation through the application and questionnaires as research tools. The Cronbach's alpha, and the reliability was 0.87. The treatments were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Findings: It is concluded that almost always supervisors and managers of these public entities (municipalities and governance) do consider the dimensions: state of the control of the management of the project, characteristics of the projects, requirements for the control of project management, and the model for the control project management. This is confirmed by the indicators’ behavior of standards at strategic points. In addition, it is envisioned that the checklist and information on the application are below the average of the dimension, in the same way, priority was given to the management of infrastructure projects as level indicators of financial progress. Application / Improvements: Considering the phases of the model of control in project management executed, generates indicators that describe the rules for the verification of the information on your application.
User

  • Perez-Carballo J. Control de gestión empresarial. 8th Edition. Madrid: Esic Editorial. 2013; p. 1–383.

  • Dellavedova M. Guía metodologica para la evaluación del impacto ambiental. Taller vertical Meda Altamir. La Plata: Universidad de la Plata, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo. 2011; p. 1–38.

  • Gutierrez J, Urrego G, Carmona J. Aproximacion a la gestion del ordenamiento territoral en Colombia frente a megaproyectos de infraestructura. Perspectiva Geográfica. 2016; 21(1):127–50. Crossref.

  • Gomez D. El pacto global de las naciones unidas: sobre la responsabilidad social, la anticorrupcion y la seguridad. ProlegomenosRevistafaculted de derecho. 2011; 14(28): 217–31.

  • Celedon Consuegra P. Ecoeficiencia y desarrollo de infraestructura urbana sostenible en Asia y America Latina. Region Caribe, NacionesUnidas, Santiago de Chile. 2011; p.1–62.

  • Rojas C. El sistema nacional de normalización, certificación y meteorología. Bogota. 2011.

  • Frenk J. La salud de la poblacion. Hacia una nueva salud pública. Fondo de Cultura Economica. 2016; p.1–26.

  • Rebollo W. Despolitización de la funcionpublica: analisis de eficacia del Sistema de Alta Direccion Pública en la Republica de Chile. Teisis para optar el grado Magister en gestion y politicaspúblicas. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Ingeniería industrial. 2014; p.1–118.

  • Cartay-Angulo I. Gestion de Proyectos un enfoque PDVSA. Merida, Venezuela: Editorial Torococo. 2010.

  • Chacin L. Gerencia estratégica financiera y control de gestión en organizaciones del sector electrico de Venezuela. Revistas Cientificasy Humanisticas. 2010; 9(2):297–324.

  • Gido J, Clements J. Administracion Exitosa de Proyectos. 5th Edition. Cengage. Learning. 2012.

  • Cordoba M. Formulacion y evaluacion de proyectos. Segunda Edition. Bogota: ECOE-Ediciones. 2011.

  • Campero M. Rol de los principios de administración de proyectos en el manejo de obras civiles. Revista de ingenieria de contruccion. 2013; 28(1): 81–94.

  • Arias FG. El Proyecto de Investigación. Introducción a la Metodología Científica. Editorial Episteme. 2012.

  • Ruiz J. Metodología de la investigacion cualitativa. 5thEdition. Universidad de Deusto Bilbao. 2012.

  • Domínguez - Lara A, Merino - Soto C. Por que es importante reportar los intervalos de confianza del coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Ni-ez y Juventud. 2015; 13(2):1326–28.

  • Santesmases M, Valderrey F, Sanchez A. Fundamentos de mercadotecnia. Primera Ebook ed. México: Grupo Editorial Patria. 2014.

  • Monta-ez G. Formulación y evaluación de proyectos agropecuarios. Gloria Acened Puentes Montanez. Bogota: ECOE. Ediciones. 2011; p.1–181.

  • Guía del PMBOK. Guía de los Fundamentos para la Direccion de Proyecto. Quinta Edition. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc. 2013; p.1–596.

  • Chamoun Y. Administración Exitosa de Proyectos, La Guía. Mexico: McGraw Hill. 2002.

  • Olivos PC, Carrasco FO, Flores JL, Moreno YM, Nava GL. Modelo de gestión logistica para peque-as y medianas empresas en Mexico. Contaduría y administración. 2015; 60 (1):181–203.


Abstract Views: 208

PDF Views: 0




  • Management Control of Infrastructure Projects in the Public Entities of the Colombian Department of La Guajira

Abstract Views: 208  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jean Carlos Lopez Solano
Riohacha, Colombia
Danny Daniel Lopez Juvinao
Research Group, IPAITUG, Universidad de La Guajira, Colombia
Iris Jimenez-Pitre
Research Group, BIEMARC, Universidad de La Guajira,, Colombia

Abstract


Objectives: To analyze the control model in the management of infrastructure projects in municipalities and public entities of the department of La Guajira, Colombia. Materials and Methods: The research was descriptive, non-experimental and transactional. The population was composed of supervisors, directors of municipal governments and the government of the department of La Guajira. For the collection of data, we used the technique of observation through the application and questionnaires as research tools. The Cronbach's alpha, and the reliability was 0.87. The treatments were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Findings: It is concluded that almost always supervisors and managers of these public entities (municipalities and governance) do consider the dimensions: state of the control of the management of the project, characteristics of the projects, requirements for the control of project management, and the model for the control project management. This is confirmed by the indicators’ behavior of standards at strategic points. In addition, it is envisioned that the checklist and information on the application are below the average of the dimension, in the same way, priority was given to the management of infrastructure projects as level indicators of financial progress. Application / Improvements: Considering the phases of the model of control in project management executed, generates indicators that describe the rules for the verification of the information on your application.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst%2F2018%2Fv11i26%2F123167